Cargando…

Development and Evaluation of an Accelerometer-Based Protocol for Measuring Physical Activity Levels in Cancer Survivors: Development and Usability Study

BACKGROUND: The collection of self-reported physical activity using validated questionnaires has known bias and measurement error. OBJECTIVE: Accelerometry, an objective measure of daily activity, increases the rigor and accuracy of physical activity measurements. Here, we describe the methodology a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crane, Tracy E, Skiba, Meghan B, Miller, Austin, Garcia, David O, Thomson, Cynthia A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32969828
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18491
_version_ 1783592010272210944
author Crane, Tracy E
Skiba, Meghan B
Miller, Austin
Garcia, David O
Thomson, Cynthia A
author_facet Crane, Tracy E
Skiba, Meghan B
Miller, Austin
Garcia, David O
Thomson, Cynthia A
author_sort Crane, Tracy E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The collection of self-reported physical activity using validated questionnaires has known bias and measurement error. OBJECTIVE: Accelerometry, an objective measure of daily activity, increases the rigor and accuracy of physical activity measurements. Here, we describe the methodology and related protocols for accelerometry data collection and quality assurance using the Actigraph GT9X accelerometer data collection in a convenience sample of ovarian cancer survivors enrolled in GOG/NRG 0225, a 24-month randomized controlled trial of diet and physical activity intervention versus attention control. METHODS: From July 2015 to December 2019, accelerometers were mailed on 1337 separate occasions to 580 study participants to wear at 4 time points (baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months) for 7 consecutive days. Study staff contacted participants via telephone to confirm their availability to wear the accelerometers and reviewed instructions and procedures regarding the return of the accelerometers and assisted with any technology concerns. RESULTS: We evaluated factors associated with wear compliance, including activity tracking, use of a mobile app, and demographic characteristics with chi-square tests and logistic regression. Compliant data, defined as ≥4 consecutive days with ≥10 hours daily wear time, exceeded 90% at all study time points. Activity tracking, but no other characteristics, was significantly associated with compliant data at all time points (P<.001). This implementation of data collection through accelerometry provided highly compliant and usable activity data in women who recently completed treatment for ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The high compliance and data quality associated with this protocol suggest that it could be disseminated to support researchers who seek to collect robust objective activity data in cancer survivors residing in a wide geographic area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7545325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75453252020-10-20 Development and Evaluation of an Accelerometer-Based Protocol for Measuring Physical Activity Levels in Cancer Survivors: Development and Usability Study Crane, Tracy E Skiba, Meghan B Miller, Austin Garcia, David O Thomson, Cynthia A JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: The collection of self-reported physical activity using validated questionnaires has known bias and measurement error. OBJECTIVE: Accelerometry, an objective measure of daily activity, increases the rigor and accuracy of physical activity measurements. Here, we describe the methodology and related protocols for accelerometry data collection and quality assurance using the Actigraph GT9X accelerometer data collection in a convenience sample of ovarian cancer survivors enrolled in GOG/NRG 0225, a 24-month randomized controlled trial of diet and physical activity intervention versus attention control. METHODS: From July 2015 to December 2019, accelerometers were mailed on 1337 separate occasions to 580 study participants to wear at 4 time points (baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months) for 7 consecutive days. Study staff contacted participants via telephone to confirm their availability to wear the accelerometers and reviewed instructions and procedures regarding the return of the accelerometers and assisted with any technology concerns. RESULTS: We evaluated factors associated with wear compliance, including activity tracking, use of a mobile app, and demographic characteristics with chi-square tests and logistic regression. Compliant data, defined as ≥4 consecutive days with ≥10 hours daily wear time, exceeded 90% at all study time points. Activity tracking, but no other characteristics, was significantly associated with compliant data at all time points (P<.001). This implementation of data collection through accelerometry provided highly compliant and usable activity data in women who recently completed treatment for ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The high compliance and data quality associated with this protocol suggest that it could be disseminated to support researchers who seek to collect robust objective activity data in cancer survivors residing in a wide geographic area. JMIR Publications 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7545325/ /pubmed/32969828 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18491 Text en ©Tracy E Crane, Meghan B Skiba, Austin Miller, David O Garcia, Cynthia A Thomson. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 24.09.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Crane, Tracy E
Skiba, Meghan B
Miller, Austin
Garcia, David O
Thomson, Cynthia A
Development and Evaluation of an Accelerometer-Based Protocol for Measuring Physical Activity Levels in Cancer Survivors: Development and Usability Study
title Development and Evaluation of an Accelerometer-Based Protocol for Measuring Physical Activity Levels in Cancer Survivors: Development and Usability Study
title_full Development and Evaluation of an Accelerometer-Based Protocol for Measuring Physical Activity Levels in Cancer Survivors: Development and Usability Study
title_fullStr Development and Evaluation of an Accelerometer-Based Protocol for Measuring Physical Activity Levels in Cancer Survivors: Development and Usability Study
title_full_unstemmed Development and Evaluation of an Accelerometer-Based Protocol for Measuring Physical Activity Levels in Cancer Survivors: Development and Usability Study
title_short Development and Evaluation of an Accelerometer-Based Protocol for Measuring Physical Activity Levels in Cancer Survivors: Development and Usability Study
title_sort development and evaluation of an accelerometer-based protocol for measuring physical activity levels in cancer survivors: development and usability study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32969828
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18491
work_keys_str_mv AT cranetracye developmentandevaluationofanaccelerometerbasedprotocolformeasuringphysicalactivitylevelsincancersurvivorsdevelopmentandusabilitystudy
AT skibameghanb developmentandevaluationofanaccelerometerbasedprotocolformeasuringphysicalactivitylevelsincancersurvivorsdevelopmentandusabilitystudy
AT milleraustin developmentandevaluationofanaccelerometerbasedprotocolformeasuringphysicalactivitylevelsincancersurvivorsdevelopmentandusabilitystudy
AT garciadavido developmentandevaluationofanaccelerometerbasedprotocolformeasuringphysicalactivitylevelsincancersurvivorsdevelopmentandusabilitystudy
AT thomsoncynthiaa developmentandevaluationofanaccelerometerbasedprotocolformeasuringphysicalactivitylevelsincancersurvivorsdevelopmentandusabilitystudy