Cargando…

An evaluation of whether propensity score adjustment can remove the self-selection bias inherent to web panel surveys addressing sensitive health behaviours

BACKGROUND: In health research, population estimates are generally obtained from probability-based surveys. In market research surveys are frequently conducted from volunteer web panels. Propensity score adjustment (PSA) is often used at analysis to try to remove bias in the web survey, but empirica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Copas, Andrew, Burkill, Sarah, Conrad, Fred, Couper, Mick P., Erens, Bob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01134-4
_version_ 1783592050195693568
author Copas, Andrew
Burkill, Sarah
Conrad, Fred
Couper, Mick P.
Erens, Bob
author_facet Copas, Andrew
Burkill, Sarah
Conrad, Fred
Couper, Mick P.
Erens, Bob
author_sort Copas, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In health research, population estimates are generally obtained from probability-based surveys. In market research surveys are frequently conducted from volunteer web panels. Propensity score adjustment (PSA) is often used at analysis to try to remove bias in the web survey, but empirical evidence of its effectiveness is mixed. We assess the ability of PSA to remove bias in the context of sensitive sexual health research and the potential of web panel surveys to replace or supplement probability surveys. METHODS: Four web panel surveys asked a subset of questions from the third British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3). Five propensity scores were generated for each web survey. The scores were developed from progressively larger sets of variables, beginning with demographic variables only and ending with demographic, sexual identity, lifestyle, attitudinal and sexual behaviour variables together. The surveys were weighted to match Natsal-3 based on propensity score quintiles. The performance of each survey and weighting was assessed by calculating the average ‘absolute’ odds ratio (inverse of the odds ratio if less than 1) across 22 pre-specified sexual behaviour outcomes of interest comparing the weighted web survey with Natsal-3. The average standard error across odds ratios was examined to assess the impact of weighting upon variance. RESULTS: Propensity weighting reduced bias relative to Natsal-3 as more variables were added for males, but had little effect for females, and variance increased for some surveys. Surveys with more biased estimates before propensity weighting showed greater reduction in bias from adjustment. Inconsistencies in performance were evident across surveys and outcomes. For most surveys and outcomes any reduction in bias was only partial and for some outcomes the bias increased. CONCLUSIONS: Even after propensity weighting using a rich range of information, including some sexual behaviour variables, some bias remained and variance increased for some web surveys. Whilst our findings support the use of PSA for web panel surveys, the reduction in bias is likely to be partial and unpredictable, consistent with the findings from market research. Our results do not support the use of volunteer web panels to generate unbiased population health estimates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7545552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75455522020-10-13 An evaluation of whether propensity score adjustment can remove the self-selection bias inherent to web panel surveys addressing sensitive health behaviours Copas, Andrew Burkill, Sarah Conrad, Fred Couper, Mick P. Erens, Bob BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: In health research, population estimates are generally obtained from probability-based surveys. In market research surveys are frequently conducted from volunteer web panels. Propensity score adjustment (PSA) is often used at analysis to try to remove bias in the web survey, but empirical evidence of its effectiveness is mixed. We assess the ability of PSA to remove bias in the context of sensitive sexual health research and the potential of web panel surveys to replace or supplement probability surveys. METHODS: Four web panel surveys asked a subset of questions from the third British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3). Five propensity scores were generated for each web survey. The scores were developed from progressively larger sets of variables, beginning with demographic variables only and ending with demographic, sexual identity, lifestyle, attitudinal and sexual behaviour variables together. The surveys were weighted to match Natsal-3 based on propensity score quintiles. The performance of each survey and weighting was assessed by calculating the average ‘absolute’ odds ratio (inverse of the odds ratio if less than 1) across 22 pre-specified sexual behaviour outcomes of interest comparing the weighted web survey with Natsal-3. The average standard error across odds ratios was examined to assess the impact of weighting upon variance. RESULTS: Propensity weighting reduced bias relative to Natsal-3 as more variables were added for males, but had little effect for females, and variance increased for some surveys. Surveys with more biased estimates before propensity weighting showed greater reduction in bias from adjustment. Inconsistencies in performance were evident across surveys and outcomes. For most surveys and outcomes any reduction in bias was only partial and for some outcomes the bias increased. CONCLUSIONS: Even after propensity weighting using a rich range of information, including some sexual behaviour variables, some bias remained and variance increased for some web surveys. Whilst our findings support the use of PSA for web panel surveys, the reduction in bias is likely to be partial and unpredictable, consistent with the findings from market research. Our results do not support the use of volunteer web panels to generate unbiased population health estimates. BioMed Central 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7545552/ /pubmed/33032535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01134-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Copas, Andrew
Burkill, Sarah
Conrad, Fred
Couper, Mick P.
Erens, Bob
An evaluation of whether propensity score adjustment can remove the self-selection bias inherent to web panel surveys addressing sensitive health behaviours
title An evaluation of whether propensity score adjustment can remove the self-selection bias inherent to web panel surveys addressing sensitive health behaviours
title_full An evaluation of whether propensity score adjustment can remove the self-selection bias inherent to web panel surveys addressing sensitive health behaviours
title_fullStr An evaluation of whether propensity score adjustment can remove the self-selection bias inherent to web panel surveys addressing sensitive health behaviours
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of whether propensity score adjustment can remove the self-selection bias inherent to web panel surveys addressing sensitive health behaviours
title_short An evaluation of whether propensity score adjustment can remove the self-selection bias inherent to web panel surveys addressing sensitive health behaviours
title_sort evaluation of whether propensity score adjustment can remove the self-selection bias inherent to web panel surveys addressing sensitive health behaviours
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01134-4
work_keys_str_mv AT copasandrew anevaluationofwhetherpropensityscoreadjustmentcanremovetheselfselectionbiasinherenttowebpanelsurveysaddressingsensitivehealthbehaviours
AT burkillsarah anevaluationofwhetherpropensityscoreadjustmentcanremovetheselfselectionbiasinherenttowebpanelsurveysaddressingsensitivehealthbehaviours
AT conradfred anevaluationofwhetherpropensityscoreadjustmentcanremovetheselfselectionbiasinherenttowebpanelsurveysaddressingsensitivehealthbehaviours
AT coupermickp anevaluationofwhetherpropensityscoreadjustmentcanremovetheselfselectionbiasinherenttowebpanelsurveysaddressingsensitivehealthbehaviours
AT erensbob anevaluationofwhetherpropensityscoreadjustmentcanremovetheselfselectionbiasinherenttowebpanelsurveysaddressingsensitivehealthbehaviours
AT copasandrew evaluationofwhetherpropensityscoreadjustmentcanremovetheselfselectionbiasinherenttowebpanelsurveysaddressingsensitivehealthbehaviours
AT burkillsarah evaluationofwhetherpropensityscoreadjustmentcanremovetheselfselectionbiasinherenttowebpanelsurveysaddressingsensitivehealthbehaviours
AT conradfred evaluationofwhetherpropensityscoreadjustmentcanremovetheselfselectionbiasinherenttowebpanelsurveysaddressingsensitivehealthbehaviours
AT coupermickp evaluationofwhetherpropensityscoreadjustmentcanremovetheselfselectionbiasinherenttowebpanelsurveysaddressingsensitivehealthbehaviours
AT erensbob evaluationofwhetherpropensityscoreadjustmentcanremovetheselfselectionbiasinherenttowebpanelsurveysaddressingsensitivehealthbehaviours