Cargando…
LDL-C: lower is better for longer—even at low risk
BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) causes atherosclerotic disease, as demonstrated in experimental and epidemiological cohorts, randomised controlled trials, and Mendelian randomisation studies. MAIN TEXT: There is considerable inconsistency between existing guidelines as to how...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01792-7 |
_version_ | 1783592055618928640 |
---|---|
author | Penson, Peter E. Pirro, Matteo Banach, Maciej |
author_facet | Penson, Peter E. Pirro, Matteo Banach, Maciej |
author_sort | Penson, Peter E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) causes atherosclerotic disease, as demonstrated in experimental and epidemiological cohorts, randomised controlled trials, and Mendelian randomisation studies. MAIN TEXT: There is considerable inconsistency between existing guidelines as to how to effectively manage patients at low overall risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) who have persistently elevated levels of LDL-C. We propose a step-by-step practical approach for the management of cardiovascular risks in individuals with low (< 1%) 10-year risk of CVD, and elevated (> 140 mg/dL, 3.6 mmol/L) LDL-C. The strategy proposed is based on the level of adherence to lifestyle interventions (LSI), and in case of non-adherence, stepwise practical management, including lipid-lowering therapy, is recommended to achieve a target LDL-C levels (< 115 mg/dL, 3.0 mmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are necessary to answer the questions on the long-term efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of the suggested approach. This is critical, considering the ever-increasing numbers of such low-risk patients seen in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7545575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75455752020-10-13 LDL-C: lower is better for longer—even at low risk Penson, Peter E. Pirro, Matteo Banach, Maciej BMC Med Opinion BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) causes atherosclerotic disease, as demonstrated in experimental and epidemiological cohorts, randomised controlled trials, and Mendelian randomisation studies. MAIN TEXT: There is considerable inconsistency between existing guidelines as to how to effectively manage patients at low overall risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) who have persistently elevated levels of LDL-C. We propose a step-by-step practical approach for the management of cardiovascular risks in individuals with low (< 1%) 10-year risk of CVD, and elevated (> 140 mg/dL, 3.6 mmol/L) LDL-C. The strategy proposed is based on the level of adherence to lifestyle interventions (LSI), and in case of non-adherence, stepwise practical management, including lipid-lowering therapy, is recommended to achieve a target LDL-C levels (< 115 mg/dL, 3.0 mmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are necessary to answer the questions on the long-term efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of the suggested approach. This is critical, considering the ever-increasing numbers of such low-risk patients seen in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7545575/ /pubmed/33032586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01792-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Opinion Penson, Peter E. Pirro, Matteo Banach, Maciej LDL-C: lower is better for longer—even at low risk |
title | LDL-C: lower is better for longer—even at low risk |
title_full | LDL-C: lower is better for longer—even at low risk |
title_fullStr | LDL-C: lower is better for longer—even at low risk |
title_full_unstemmed | LDL-C: lower is better for longer—even at low risk |
title_short | LDL-C: lower is better for longer—even at low risk |
title_sort | ldl-c: lower is better for longer—even at low risk |
topic | Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01792-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pensonpetere ldlclowerisbetterforlongerevenatlowrisk AT pirromatteo ldlclowerisbetterforlongerevenatlowrisk AT banachmaciej ldlclowerisbetterforlongerevenatlowrisk |