Cargando…

LDL-C: lower is better for longer—even at low risk

BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) causes atherosclerotic disease, as demonstrated in experimental and epidemiological cohorts, randomised controlled trials, and Mendelian randomisation studies. MAIN TEXT: There is considerable inconsistency between existing guidelines as to how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penson, Peter E., Pirro, Matteo, Banach, Maciej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01792-7
_version_ 1783592055618928640
author Penson, Peter E.
Pirro, Matteo
Banach, Maciej
author_facet Penson, Peter E.
Pirro, Matteo
Banach, Maciej
author_sort Penson, Peter E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) causes atherosclerotic disease, as demonstrated in experimental and epidemiological cohorts, randomised controlled trials, and Mendelian randomisation studies. MAIN TEXT: There is considerable inconsistency between existing guidelines as to how to effectively manage patients at low overall risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) who have persistently elevated levels of LDL-C. We propose a step-by-step practical approach for the management of cardiovascular risks in individuals with low (< 1%) 10-year risk of CVD, and elevated (> 140 mg/dL, 3.6 mmol/L) LDL-C. The strategy proposed is based on the level of adherence to lifestyle interventions (LSI), and in case of non-adherence, stepwise practical management, including lipid-lowering therapy, is recommended to achieve a target LDL-C levels (< 115 mg/dL, 3.0 mmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are necessary to answer the questions on the long-term efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of the suggested approach. This is critical, considering the ever-increasing numbers of such low-risk patients seen in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7545575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75455752020-10-13 LDL-C: lower is better for longer—even at low risk Penson, Peter E. Pirro, Matteo Banach, Maciej BMC Med Opinion BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) causes atherosclerotic disease, as demonstrated in experimental and epidemiological cohorts, randomised controlled trials, and Mendelian randomisation studies. MAIN TEXT: There is considerable inconsistency between existing guidelines as to how to effectively manage patients at low overall risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) who have persistently elevated levels of LDL-C. We propose a step-by-step practical approach for the management of cardiovascular risks in individuals with low (< 1%) 10-year risk of CVD, and elevated (> 140 mg/dL, 3.6 mmol/L) LDL-C. The strategy proposed is based on the level of adherence to lifestyle interventions (LSI), and in case of non-adherence, stepwise practical management, including lipid-lowering therapy, is recommended to achieve a target LDL-C levels (< 115 mg/dL, 3.0 mmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are necessary to answer the questions on the long-term efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of the suggested approach. This is critical, considering the ever-increasing numbers of such low-risk patients seen in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7545575/ /pubmed/33032586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01792-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Opinion
Penson, Peter E.
Pirro, Matteo
Banach, Maciej
LDL-C: lower is better for longer—even at low risk
title LDL-C: lower is better for longer—even at low risk
title_full LDL-C: lower is better for longer—even at low risk
title_fullStr LDL-C: lower is better for longer—even at low risk
title_full_unstemmed LDL-C: lower is better for longer—even at low risk
title_short LDL-C: lower is better for longer—even at low risk
title_sort ldl-c: lower is better for longer—even at low risk
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01792-7
work_keys_str_mv AT pensonpetere ldlclowerisbetterforlongerevenatlowrisk
AT pirromatteo ldlclowerisbetterforlongerevenatlowrisk
AT banachmaciej ldlclowerisbetterforlongerevenatlowrisk