Cargando…

Impacts of social support on the treatment outcomes of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of social support on treatment success promotion or lost to follow-up (LTFU) reduction for patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). DESIGN: We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and Medline databases until 18 June 2020 for interventional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wen, Shuqin, Yin, Jia, Sun, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33033087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036985
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of social support on treatment success promotion or lost to follow-up (LTFU) reduction for patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). DESIGN: We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and Medline databases until 18 June 2020 for interventional or mixed-method studies which reported social support and treatment outcomes of DR-TB patients. Two independent reviewers extracted data and disagreements were resolved by consensus with a third reviewer. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate the OR and 95% CI for the effects of social support on the improvement of treatment outcomes and the heterogeneity and risk of bias were assessed. SETTING: Low-income and middle-income countries. PARTICIPANTS: DR-TB patients. OUTCOMES: Treatment success is defined as the combination of the cured and treatment completion, and LTFU is measured as treatment being interrupted for two consecutive months or more. RESULTS: Among 173 articles selected for full-text review, 162 were excluded through independent review (kappa=0.87) and 10 studies enrolling 1621 DR-TB patients in eight countries were included for qualitative analysis. In these studies, the most frequently introduced social support was material support (10 studies), followed by informational (eight studies), emotional (seven studies) and companionship support (four studies). Seven studies that reported treatment outcomes in both intervention arm and control arm are qualified for meta-analysis. An encouraging improvement on treatment success rate (OR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.80 to 3.69) was found when material support was integrated into social support packages and no heterogeneity was observed (I1 of 0%, Q test p=0.72). Reduction on LTFU rate (OR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.55) was also noted when material support was available but substantial heterogeneity was found (I(2) of 80%, Q test p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Material support appeared feasible and effective to improve treatment success for DR-TB patients combined with other social support interventions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019140824.