Cargando…
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education programme for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: study protocol for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is recognised globally as a prevalent, costly and disabling condition. Recurrences are common and contribute to much of the burden of LBP. Current evidence favours exercise and education for prevention of LBP recurrence, but an optimal intervention has not yet been...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33033088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037149 |
_version_ | 1783592069119344640 |
---|---|
author | Pocovi, Natasha Celeste Lin, Chung-Wei C Latimer, Jane Merom, Dafna Tiedemann, Anne Maher, Christopher van Tulder, Maurits W Macaskill, Petra Clavisi, Ornella Tong, Shuk Yin Kate Hancock, Mark J |
author_facet | Pocovi, Natasha Celeste Lin, Chung-Wei C Latimer, Jane Merom, Dafna Tiedemann, Anne Maher, Christopher van Tulder, Maurits W Macaskill, Petra Clavisi, Ornella Tong, Shuk Yin Kate Hancock, Mark J |
author_sort | Pocovi, Natasha Celeste |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is recognised globally as a prevalent, costly and disabling condition. Recurrences are common and contribute to much of the burden of LBP. Current evidence favours exercise and education for prevention of LBP recurrence, but an optimal intervention has not yet been established. Walking is a simple, widely accessible, low-cost intervention that has yet to be evaluated. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to establish the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive and individualised walking and education programme (intervention) for the prevention of LBP recurrences in adults compared with no treatment (control). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A pragmatic, two-armed RCT comparing walking and education (n=349) with a no treatment control group (n=349). Inclusion criteria are adults recovered from an episode of non-specific LBP within the last 6 months. Those allocated to the intervention group will receive six sessions (three face to face and three telephone delivered) with a trained physiotherapist to facilitate a progressive walking programme and education over a 6-month period. The primary outcome will be days to first recurrence of an episode of activity-limiting LBP. The secondary outcomes include days to recurrence of an episode of LBP, days to recurrence of an episode of LBP leading to care seeking, disability and quality of life measured at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months and costs associated with LBP recurrence. All participants will be followed up monthly for a minimum of 12 months. The primary intention-to-treat analysis will assess difference in survival curves (days to recurrence) using the log-rank statistic. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted from the societal perspective. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference: 5201949218164, May 2019). Findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12619001134112. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7545638 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75456382020-10-19 Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education programme for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: study protocol for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial Pocovi, Natasha Celeste Lin, Chung-Wei C Latimer, Jane Merom, Dafna Tiedemann, Anne Maher, Christopher van Tulder, Maurits W Macaskill, Petra Clavisi, Ornella Tong, Shuk Yin Kate Hancock, Mark J BMJ Open Global Health INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is recognised globally as a prevalent, costly and disabling condition. Recurrences are common and contribute to much of the burden of LBP. Current evidence favours exercise and education for prevention of LBP recurrence, but an optimal intervention has not yet been established. Walking is a simple, widely accessible, low-cost intervention that has yet to be evaluated. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to establish the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive and individualised walking and education programme (intervention) for the prevention of LBP recurrences in adults compared with no treatment (control). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A pragmatic, two-armed RCT comparing walking and education (n=349) with a no treatment control group (n=349). Inclusion criteria are adults recovered from an episode of non-specific LBP within the last 6 months. Those allocated to the intervention group will receive six sessions (three face to face and three telephone delivered) with a trained physiotherapist to facilitate a progressive walking programme and education over a 6-month period. The primary outcome will be days to first recurrence of an episode of activity-limiting LBP. The secondary outcomes include days to recurrence of an episode of LBP, days to recurrence of an episode of LBP leading to care seeking, disability and quality of life measured at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months and costs associated with LBP recurrence. All participants will be followed up monthly for a minimum of 12 months. The primary intention-to-treat analysis will assess difference in survival curves (days to recurrence) using the log-rank statistic. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted from the societal perspective. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference: 5201949218164, May 2019). Findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12619001134112. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7545638/ /pubmed/33033088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037149 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Global Health Pocovi, Natasha Celeste Lin, Chung-Wei C Latimer, Jane Merom, Dafna Tiedemann, Anne Maher, Christopher van Tulder, Maurits W Macaskill, Petra Clavisi, Ornella Tong, Shuk Yin Kate Hancock, Mark J Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education programme for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: study protocol for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial |
title | Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education programme for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: study protocol for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education programme for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: study protocol for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education programme for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: study protocol for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education programme for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: study protocol for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education programme for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: study protocol for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education programme for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: study protocol for the walkback randomised controlled trial |
topic | Global Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33033088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037149 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pocovinatashaceleste effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogrammeforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstudyprotocolforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT linchungweic effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogrammeforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstudyprotocolforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT latimerjane effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogrammeforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstudyprotocolforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT meromdafna effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogrammeforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstudyprotocolforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tiedemannanne effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogrammeforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstudyprotocolforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT maherchristopher effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogrammeforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstudyprotocolforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vantuldermauritsw effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogrammeforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstudyprotocolforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT macaskillpetra effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogrammeforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstudyprotocolforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT clavisiornella effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogrammeforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstudyprotocolforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tongshukyinkate effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogrammeforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstudyprotocolforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hancockmarkj effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofaprogressiveindividualisedwalkingandeducationprogrammeforpreventionoflowbackpainrecurrenceinadultsstudyprotocolforthewalkbackrandomisedcontrolledtrial |