Cargando…

The impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal Escherichia coli populations

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of therapy-induced intestinal tract concentrations of antimicrobials allows for interpretation and prediction of antimicrobial resistance selection within the intestinal microbiota. This study describes the impact of three different doses of enrofloxacin (ENR) and two different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Smet, Joren, Boyen, Filip, Croubels, Siska, Rasschaert, Geertrui, Haesebrouck, Freddy, Temmerman, Robin, Rutjens, Sofie, De Backer, Patrick, Devreese, Mathias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02608-9
_version_ 1783592113142759424
author De Smet, Joren
Boyen, Filip
Croubels, Siska
Rasschaert, Geertrui
Haesebrouck, Freddy
Temmerman, Robin
Rutjens, Sofie
De Backer, Patrick
Devreese, Mathias
author_facet De Smet, Joren
Boyen, Filip
Croubels, Siska
Rasschaert, Geertrui
Haesebrouck, Freddy
Temmerman, Robin
Rutjens, Sofie
De Backer, Patrick
Devreese, Mathias
author_sort De Smet, Joren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Knowledge of therapy-induced intestinal tract concentrations of antimicrobials allows for interpretation and prediction of antimicrobial resistance selection within the intestinal microbiota. This study describes the impact of three different doses of enrofloxacin (ENR) and two different administration routes on the intestinal concentration of ENR and on the fecal Escherichia coli populations in pigs. Enrofloxacin was administered on three consecutive days to four different treatment groups. The groups either received an oral bolus administration of ENR (conventional or half dose) or an intramuscular administration (conventional or double dose). RESULTS: Quantitative analysis of fecal samples showed high ENR concentrations in all groups, ranging from 5.114 ± 1.272 μg/g up to 39.54 ± 10.43 μg/g at the end of the treatment period. In addition, analysis of the luminal intestinal content revealed an increase of ENR concentration from the proximal to the distal intestinal tract segments, with no significant effect of administration route. Fecal samples were also screened for resistance in E. coli isolates against ENR. Wild-type (MIC≤0.125 μg/mL) and non-wild-type (0.125 < MIC≤2 μg/mL) E. coli isolates were found at time 0 h. At the end of treatment (3 days) only non-wild-type isolates (MIC≥32 μg/mL) were found. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the observed intestinal ENR concentrations in all groups showed to be both theoretically (based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles) and effectively (in vivo measurement) capable of significantly reducing the intestinal E. coli wild-type population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7545837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75458372020-10-13 The impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal Escherichia coli populations De Smet, Joren Boyen, Filip Croubels, Siska Rasschaert, Geertrui Haesebrouck, Freddy Temmerman, Robin Rutjens, Sofie De Backer, Patrick Devreese, Mathias BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Knowledge of therapy-induced intestinal tract concentrations of antimicrobials allows for interpretation and prediction of antimicrobial resistance selection within the intestinal microbiota. This study describes the impact of three different doses of enrofloxacin (ENR) and two different administration routes on the intestinal concentration of ENR and on the fecal Escherichia coli populations in pigs. Enrofloxacin was administered on three consecutive days to four different treatment groups. The groups either received an oral bolus administration of ENR (conventional or half dose) or an intramuscular administration (conventional or double dose). RESULTS: Quantitative analysis of fecal samples showed high ENR concentrations in all groups, ranging from 5.114 ± 1.272 μg/g up to 39.54 ± 10.43 μg/g at the end of the treatment period. In addition, analysis of the luminal intestinal content revealed an increase of ENR concentration from the proximal to the distal intestinal tract segments, with no significant effect of administration route. Fecal samples were also screened for resistance in E. coli isolates against ENR. Wild-type (MIC≤0.125 μg/mL) and non-wild-type (0.125 < MIC≤2 μg/mL) E. coli isolates were found at time 0 h. At the end of treatment (3 days) only non-wild-type isolates (MIC≥32 μg/mL) were found. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the observed intestinal ENR concentrations in all groups showed to be both theoretically (based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles) and effectively (in vivo measurement) capable of significantly reducing the intestinal E. coli wild-type population. BioMed Central 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7545837/ /pubmed/33032597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02608-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
De Smet, Joren
Boyen, Filip
Croubels, Siska
Rasschaert, Geertrui
Haesebrouck, Freddy
Temmerman, Robin
Rutjens, Sofie
De Backer, Patrick
Devreese, Mathias
The impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal Escherichia coli populations
title The impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal Escherichia coli populations
title_full The impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal Escherichia coli populations
title_fullStr The impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal Escherichia coli populations
title_full_unstemmed The impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal Escherichia coli populations
title_short The impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal Escherichia coli populations
title_sort impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal escherichia coli populations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02608-9
work_keys_str_mv AT desmetjoren theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT boyenfilip theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT croubelssiska theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT rasschaertgeertrui theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT haesebrouckfreddy theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT temmermanrobin theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT rutjenssofie theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT debackerpatrick theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT devreesemathias theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT desmetjoren impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT boyenfilip impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT croubelssiska impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT rasschaertgeertrui impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT haesebrouckfreddy impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT temmermanrobin impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT rutjenssofie impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT debackerpatrick impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations
AT devreesemathias impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations