Cargando…
The impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal Escherichia coli populations
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of therapy-induced intestinal tract concentrations of antimicrobials allows for interpretation and prediction of antimicrobial resistance selection within the intestinal microbiota. This study describes the impact of three different doses of enrofloxacin (ENR) and two different...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02608-9 |
_version_ | 1783592113142759424 |
---|---|
author | De Smet, Joren Boyen, Filip Croubels, Siska Rasschaert, Geertrui Haesebrouck, Freddy Temmerman, Robin Rutjens, Sofie De Backer, Patrick Devreese, Mathias |
author_facet | De Smet, Joren Boyen, Filip Croubels, Siska Rasschaert, Geertrui Haesebrouck, Freddy Temmerman, Robin Rutjens, Sofie De Backer, Patrick Devreese, Mathias |
author_sort | De Smet, Joren |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Knowledge of therapy-induced intestinal tract concentrations of antimicrobials allows for interpretation and prediction of antimicrobial resistance selection within the intestinal microbiota. This study describes the impact of three different doses of enrofloxacin (ENR) and two different administration routes on the intestinal concentration of ENR and on the fecal Escherichia coli populations in pigs. Enrofloxacin was administered on three consecutive days to four different treatment groups. The groups either received an oral bolus administration of ENR (conventional or half dose) or an intramuscular administration (conventional or double dose). RESULTS: Quantitative analysis of fecal samples showed high ENR concentrations in all groups, ranging from 5.114 ± 1.272 μg/g up to 39.54 ± 10.43 μg/g at the end of the treatment period. In addition, analysis of the luminal intestinal content revealed an increase of ENR concentration from the proximal to the distal intestinal tract segments, with no significant effect of administration route. Fecal samples were also screened for resistance in E. coli isolates against ENR. Wild-type (MIC≤0.125 μg/mL) and non-wild-type (0.125 < MIC≤2 μg/mL) E. coli isolates were found at time 0 h. At the end of treatment (3 days) only non-wild-type isolates (MIC≥32 μg/mL) were found. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the observed intestinal ENR concentrations in all groups showed to be both theoretically (based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles) and effectively (in vivo measurement) capable of significantly reducing the intestinal E. coli wild-type population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7545837 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75458372020-10-13 The impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal Escherichia coli populations De Smet, Joren Boyen, Filip Croubels, Siska Rasschaert, Geertrui Haesebrouck, Freddy Temmerman, Robin Rutjens, Sofie De Backer, Patrick Devreese, Mathias BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Knowledge of therapy-induced intestinal tract concentrations of antimicrobials allows for interpretation and prediction of antimicrobial resistance selection within the intestinal microbiota. This study describes the impact of three different doses of enrofloxacin (ENR) and two different administration routes on the intestinal concentration of ENR and on the fecal Escherichia coli populations in pigs. Enrofloxacin was administered on three consecutive days to four different treatment groups. The groups either received an oral bolus administration of ENR (conventional or half dose) or an intramuscular administration (conventional or double dose). RESULTS: Quantitative analysis of fecal samples showed high ENR concentrations in all groups, ranging from 5.114 ± 1.272 μg/g up to 39.54 ± 10.43 μg/g at the end of the treatment period. In addition, analysis of the luminal intestinal content revealed an increase of ENR concentration from the proximal to the distal intestinal tract segments, with no significant effect of administration route. Fecal samples were also screened for resistance in E. coli isolates against ENR. Wild-type (MIC≤0.125 μg/mL) and non-wild-type (0.125 < MIC≤2 μg/mL) E. coli isolates were found at time 0 h. At the end of treatment (3 days) only non-wild-type isolates (MIC≥32 μg/mL) were found. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the observed intestinal ENR concentrations in all groups showed to be both theoretically (based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles) and effectively (in vivo measurement) capable of significantly reducing the intestinal E. coli wild-type population. BioMed Central 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7545837/ /pubmed/33032597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02608-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article De Smet, Joren Boyen, Filip Croubels, Siska Rasschaert, Geertrui Haesebrouck, Freddy Temmerman, Robin Rutjens, Sofie De Backer, Patrick Devreese, Mathias The impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal Escherichia coli populations |
title | The impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal Escherichia coli populations |
title_full | The impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal Escherichia coli populations |
title_fullStr | The impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal Escherichia coli populations |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal Escherichia coli populations |
title_short | The impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal Escherichia coli populations |
title_sort | impact of therapeutic-dose induced intestinal enrofloxacin concentrations in healthy pigs on fecal escherichia coli populations |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02608-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desmetjoren theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT boyenfilip theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT croubelssiska theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT rasschaertgeertrui theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT haesebrouckfreddy theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT temmermanrobin theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT rutjenssofie theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT debackerpatrick theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT devreesemathias theimpactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT desmetjoren impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT boyenfilip impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT croubelssiska impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT rasschaertgeertrui impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT haesebrouckfreddy impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT temmermanrobin impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT rutjenssofie impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT debackerpatrick impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations AT devreesemathias impactoftherapeuticdoseinducedintestinalenrofloxacinconcentrationsinhealthypigsonfecalescherichiacolipopulations |