Cargando…

We have the program, what now? Development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology

BACKGROUND: Exercise has emerged as a promising therapy for people with cancer. Novel programs have been developed to translate research into practice; however, implementation barriers have limited their success in part because successful translation of exercise oncology research into practice requi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kennedy, Mary A., Bayes, Sara, Newton, Robert U., Zissiadis, Yvonne, Spry, Nigel A., Taaffe, Dennis R., Hart, Nicolas H., Davis, Michael, Eiszele, Aileen, Galvão, Daniel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33036627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-01032-4
_version_ 1783592121189531648
author Kennedy, Mary A.
Bayes, Sara
Newton, Robert U.
Zissiadis, Yvonne
Spry, Nigel A.
Taaffe, Dennis R.
Hart, Nicolas H.
Davis, Michael
Eiszele, Aileen
Galvão, Daniel A.
author_facet Kennedy, Mary A.
Bayes, Sara
Newton, Robert U.
Zissiadis, Yvonne
Spry, Nigel A.
Taaffe, Dennis R.
Hart, Nicolas H.
Davis, Michael
Eiszele, Aileen
Galvão, Daniel A.
author_sort Kennedy, Mary A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Exercise has emerged as a promising therapy for people with cancer. Novel programs have been developed to translate research into practice; however, implementation barriers have limited their success in part because successful translation of exercise oncology research into practice requires context-specific implementation plans. The aim of this study was to employ the implementation mapping protocol to develop an implementation plan to support programming of a co-located exercise clinic and cancer treatment center. METHODS: The Implementation Mapping protocol, which consists of five specific iterative tasks, was used. A stakeholder advisory group advised throughout the process. RESULTS: A comprehensive needs assessment was used to identify the organization’s general manager as the program adopter; oncologists, center leaders, and various administrative staff as program implementers; and the operations manager as the program maintainer. Twenty performance objectives were identified. The theoretical domains framework was used to identify likely determinants of change, which informed the selection of eight individual implementation strategies across the individual and organizational levels. Finally, an evaluation plan was developed which will be used to measure the success of the implementation plan in the project’s next phase. CONCLUSION: The Implementation Mapping protocol provided a roadmap to guide development of a comprehensive implementation plan that considered all ecological domains, was informed by theory, and demonstrated an extensive understanding of the implementation context. Strong research-practitioner partnerships and effective stakeholder engagement were critical to development of the plan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7545878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75458782020-10-13 We have the program, what now? Development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology Kennedy, Mary A. Bayes, Sara Newton, Robert U. Zissiadis, Yvonne Spry, Nigel A. Taaffe, Dennis R. Hart, Nicolas H. Davis, Michael Eiszele, Aileen Galvão, Daniel A. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Exercise has emerged as a promising therapy for people with cancer. Novel programs have been developed to translate research into practice; however, implementation barriers have limited their success in part because successful translation of exercise oncology research into practice requires context-specific implementation plans. The aim of this study was to employ the implementation mapping protocol to develop an implementation plan to support programming of a co-located exercise clinic and cancer treatment center. METHODS: The Implementation Mapping protocol, which consists of five specific iterative tasks, was used. A stakeholder advisory group advised throughout the process. RESULTS: A comprehensive needs assessment was used to identify the organization’s general manager as the program adopter; oncologists, center leaders, and various administrative staff as program implementers; and the operations manager as the program maintainer. Twenty performance objectives were identified. The theoretical domains framework was used to identify likely determinants of change, which informed the selection of eight individual implementation strategies across the individual and organizational levels. Finally, an evaluation plan was developed which will be used to measure the success of the implementation plan in the project’s next phase. CONCLUSION: The Implementation Mapping protocol provided a roadmap to guide development of a comprehensive implementation plan that considered all ecological domains, was informed by theory, and demonstrated an extensive understanding of the implementation context. Strong research-practitioner partnerships and effective stakeholder engagement were critical to development of the plan. BioMed Central 2020-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7545878/ /pubmed/33036627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-01032-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kennedy, Mary A.
Bayes, Sara
Newton, Robert U.
Zissiadis, Yvonne
Spry, Nigel A.
Taaffe, Dennis R.
Hart, Nicolas H.
Davis, Michael
Eiszele, Aileen
Galvão, Daniel A.
We have the program, what now? Development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology
title We have the program, what now? Development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology
title_full We have the program, what now? Development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology
title_fullStr We have the program, what now? Development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology
title_full_unstemmed We have the program, what now? Development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology
title_short We have the program, what now? Development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology
title_sort we have the program, what now? development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33036627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-01032-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kennedymarya wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology
AT bayessara wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology
AT newtonrobertu wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology
AT zissiadisyvonne wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology
AT sprynigela wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology
AT taaffedennisr wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology
AT hartnicolash wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology
AT davismichael wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology
AT eiszeleaileen wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology
AT galvaodaniela wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology