Cargando…
We have the program, what now? Development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology
BACKGROUND: Exercise has emerged as a promising therapy for people with cancer. Novel programs have been developed to translate research into practice; however, implementation barriers have limited their success in part because successful translation of exercise oncology research into practice requi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33036627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-01032-4 |
_version_ | 1783592121189531648 |
---|---|
author | Kennedy, Mary A. Bayes, Sara Newton, Robert U. Zissiadis, Yvonne Spry, Nigel A. Taaffe, Dennis R. Hart, Nicolas H. Davis, Michael Eiszele, Aileen Galvão, Daniel A. |
author_facet | Kennedy, Mary A. Bayes, Sara Newton, Robert U. Zissiadis, Yvonne Spry, Nigel A. Taaffe, Dennis R. Hart, Nicolas H. Davis, Michael Eiszele, Aileen Galvão, Daniel A. |
author_sort | Kennedy, Mary A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Exercise has emerged as a promising therapy for people with cancer. Novel programs have been developed to translate research into practice; however, implementation barriers have limited their success in part because successful translation of exercise oncology research into practice requires context-specific implementation plans. The aim of this study was to employ the implementation mapping protocol to develop an implementation plan to support programming of a co-located exercise clinic and cancer treatment center. METHODS: The Implementation Mapping protocol, which consists of five specific iterative tasks, was used. A stakeholder advisory group advised throughout the process. RESULTS: A comprehensive needs assessment was used to identify the organization’s general manager as the program adopter; oncologists, center leaders, and various administrative staff as program implementers; and the operations manager as the program maintainer. Twenty performance objectives were identified. The theoretical domains framework was used to identify likely determinants of change, which informed the selection of eight individual implementation strategies across the individual and organizational levels. Finally, an evaluation plan was developed which will be used to measure the success of the implementation plan in the project’s next phase. CONCLUSION: The Implementation Mapping protocol provided a roadmap to guide development of a comprehensive implementation plan that considered all ecological domains, was informed by theory, and demonstrated an extensive understanding of the implementation context. Strong research-practitioner partnerships and effective stakeholder engagement were critical to development of the plan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7545878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75458782020-10-13 We have the program, what now? Development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology Kennedy, Mary A. Bayes, Sara Newton, Robert U. Zissiadis, Yvonne Spry, Nigel A. Taaffe, Dennis R. Hart, Nicolas H. Davis, Michael Eiszele, Aileen Galvão, Daniel A. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Exercise has emerged as a promising therapy for people with cancer. Novel programs have been developed to translate research into practice; however, implementation barriers have limited their success in part because successful translation of exercise oncology research into practice requires context-specific implementation plans. The aim of this study was to employ the implementation mapping protocol to develop an implementation plan to support programming of a co-located exercise clinic and cancer treatment center. METHODS: The Implementation Mapping protocol, which consists of five specific iterative tasks, was used. A stakeholder advisory group advised throughout the process. RESULTS: A comprehensive needs assessment was used to identify the organization’s general manager as the program adopter; oncologists, center leaders, and various administrative staff as program implementers; and the operations manager as the program maintainer. Twenty performance objectives were identified. The theoretical domains framework was used to identify likely determinants of change, which informed the selection of eight individual implementation strategies across the individual and organizational levels. Finally, an evaluation plan was developed which will be used to measure the success of the implementation plan in the project’s next phase. CONCLUSION: The Implementation Mapping protocol provided a roadmap to guide development of a comprehensive implementation plan that considered all ecological domains, was informed by theory, and demonstrated an extensive understanding of the implementation context. Strong research-practitioner partnerships and effective stakeholder engagement were critical to development of the plan. BioMed Central 2020-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7545878/ /pubmed/33036627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-01032-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kennedy, Mary A. Bayes, Sara Newton, Robert U. Zissiadis, Yvonne Spry, Nigel A. Taaffe, Dennis R. Hart, Nicolas H. Davis, Michael Eiszele, Aileen Galvão, Daniel A. We have the program, what now? Development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology |
title | We have the program, what now? Development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology |
title_full | We have the program, what now? Development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology |
title_fullStr | We have the program, what now? Development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology |
title_full_unstemmed | We have the program, what now? Development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology |
title_short | We have the program, what now? Development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology |
title_sort | we have the program, what now? development of an implementation plan to bridge the research-practice gap prevalent in exercise oncology |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33036627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-01032-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kennedymarya wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology AT bayessara wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology AT newtonrobertu wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology AT zissiadisyvonne wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology AT sprynigela wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology AT taaffedennisr wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology AT hartnicolash wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology AT davismichael wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology AT eiszeleaileen wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology AT galvaodaniela wehavetheprogramwhatnowdevelopmentofanimplementationplantobridgetheresearchpracticegapprevalentinexerciseoncology |