Cargando…

Health technology assessment and reimbursement policy for oncology orphan drugs in Central and Eastern Europe

BACKGROUND: The reimbursement of orphan drugs (OD) is an increasingly important for country policymakers, and still insufficiently understood, especially in Central and Eastern Europe. The aim of this research was to provide a comprehensive description of country-specific health technology assessmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malinowski, Krzysztof Piotr, Kawalec, Paweł, Trąbka, Wojciech, Sowada, Christoph, Petrova, Guenka, Manova, Manoela, Savova, Alexandra, Draganić, Pero, Slabý, Juraj, Männik, Agnes, Márky, Kristóf, Rugaja, Zinta, Gulbinovic, Jolanta, Tesar, Tomas, Paveliu, Marian Sorin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-020-01556-9
_version_ 1783592123354841088
author Malinowski, Krzysztof Piotr
Kawalec, Paweł
Trąbka, Wojciech
Sowada, Christoph
Petrova, Guenka
Manova, Manoela
Savova, Alexandra
Draganić, Pero
Slabý, Juraj
Männik, Agnes
Márky, Kristóf
Rugaja, Zinta
Gulbinovic, Jolanta
Tesar, Tomas
Paveliu, Marian Sorin
author_facet Malinowski, Krzysztof Piotr
Kawalec, Paweł
Trąbka, Wojciech
Sowada, Christoph
Petrova, Guenka
Manova, Manoela
Savova, Alexandra
Draganić, Pero
Slabý, Juraj
Männik, Agnes
Márky, Kristóf
Rugaja, Zinta
Gulbinovic, Jolanta
Tesar, Tomas
Paveliu, Marian Sorin
author_sort Malinowski, Krzysztof Piotr
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The reimbursement of orphan drugs (OD) is an increasingly important for country policymakers, and still insufficiently understood, especially in Central and Eastern Europe. The aim of this research was to provide a comprehensive description of country-specific health technology assessment (HTA) policies as well as evaluate the percentage of HTA recommendations and reimbursement decisions for oncology OD. In addition, the study was designed to elucidate the impact of reimbursement of these drugs on the public budget and the agreement between HTA recommendations and reimbursement decisions in the analysed countries. A questionnaire survey was used to collect data on the reimbursement status, HTA recommendation, marketing authorisation, and public expenses on reimbursement in 2014, 2015, and 2016 for all oncology drugs with an orphan designation by the European Medicine Agency in 2017 in Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia. The agreement between the HTA recommendation and reimbursement status was assessed using the kappa coefficient. The Pearson’s correlation was used to analyse the relationship between gross domestic product (GDP) and GDP per capita and reimbursement expenses. RESULTS: A total of 36 drugs were analysed (25% conditionally approved; 5.56% approved under exceptional circumstances). The share of reimbursed drugs ranged from 11.11% in Latvia to 41.67% in Poland. The highest share of positive recommendations was observed for Bulgaria and Estonia (36.11%), and the lowest, for Latvia (11.11%). The agreement varied from 0.4 for Poland to 1 for Latvia, Hungary, and Slovakia. Expenses were correlated with GDP (0.95 [0.81–0.99]), and not with GDP per capita (0.54 [− 0.136 to 0.873]). Expenses per capita were not correlated with GDP per capita (0.52 [− 0.15 to 0.87]). CONCLUSIONS: In Hungary, Latvia, and Slovakia, a positive recommendation was associated with a reimbursement, and a negative one, with the lack of reimbursement. The reimbursement of oncology OD is associated with a growing burden for public budget, and the expenses are correlated with the total GDP. The highest share of drugs with any recommendation was observed in Poland, and the lowest, in Latvia and Romania. The share of reimbursed drugs was the lowest in Latvia and the highest in Poland.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7545889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75458892020-10-13 Health technology assessment and reimbursement policy for oncology orphan drugs in Central and Eastern Europe Malinowski, Krzysztof Piotr Kawalec, Paweł Trąbka, Wojciech Sowada, Christoph Petrova, Guenka Manova, Manoela Savova, Alexandra Draganić, Pero Slabý, Juraj Männik, Agnes Márky, Kristóf Rugaja, Zinta Gulbinovic, Jolanta Tesar, Tomas Paveliu, Marian Sorin Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: The reimbursement of orphan drugs (OD) is an increasingly important for country policymakers, and still insufficiently understood, especially in Central and Eastern Europe. The aim of this research was to provide a comprehensive description of country-specific health technology assessment (HTA) policies as well as evaluate the percentage of HTA recommendations and reimbursement decisions for oncology OD. In addition, the study was designed to elucidate the impact of reimbursement of these drugs on the public budget and the agreement between HTA recommendations and reimbursement decisions in the analysed countries. A questionnaire survey was used to collect data on the reimbursement status, HTA recommendation, marketing authorisation, and public expenses on reimbursement in 2014, 2015, and 2016 for all oncology drugs with an orphan designation by the European Medicine Agency in 2017 in Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia. The agreement between the HTA recommendation and reimbursement status was assessed using the kappa coefficient. The Pearson’s correlation was used to analyse the relationship between gross domestic product (GDP) and GDP per capita and reimbursement expenses. RESULTS: A total of 36 drugs were analysed (25% conditionally approved; 5.56% approved under exceptional circumstances). The share of reimbursed drugs ranged from 11.11% in Latvia to 41.67% in Poland. The highest share of positive recommendations was observed for Bulgaria and Estonia (36.11%), and the lowest, for Latvia (11.11%). The agreement varied from 0.4 for Poland to 1 for Latvia, Hungary, and Slovakia. Expenses were correlated with GDP (0.95 [0.81–0.99]), and not with GDP per capita (0.54 [− 0.136 to 0.873]). Expenses per capita were not correlated with GDP per capita (0.52 [− 0.15 to 0.87]). CONCLUSIONS: In Hungary, Latvia, and Slovakia, a positive recommendation was associated with a reimbursement, and a negative one, with the lack of reimbursement. The reimbursement of oncology OD is associated with a growing burden for public budget, and the expenses are correlated with the total GDP. The highest share of drugs with any recommendation was observed in Poland, and the lowest, in Latvia and Romania. The share of reimbursed drugs was the lowest in Latvia and the highest in Poland. BioMed Central 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7545889/ /pubmed/33032634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-020-01556-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Malinowski, Krzysztof Piotr
Kawalec, Paweł
Trąbka, Wojciech
Sowada, Christoph
Petrova, Guenka
Manova, Manoela
Savova, Alexandra
Draganić, Pero
Slabý, Juraj
Männik, Agnes
Márky, Kristóf
Rugaja, Zinta
Gulbinovic, Jolanta
Tesar, Tomas
Paveliu, Marian Sorin
Health technology assessment and reimbursement policy for oncology orphan drugs in Central and Eastern Europe
title Health technology assessment and reimbursement policy for oncology orphan drugs in Central and Eastern Europe
title_full Health technology assessment and reimbursement policy for oncology orphan drugs in Central and Eastern Europe
title_fullStr Health technology assessment and reimbursement policy for oncology orphan drugs in Central and Eastern Europe
title_full_unstemmed Health technology assessment and reimbursement policy for oncology orphan drugs in Central and Eastern Europe
title_short Health technology assessment and reimbursement policy for oncology orphan drugs in Central and Eastern Europe
title_sort health technology assessment and reimbursement policy for oncology orphan drugs in central and eastern europe
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-020-01556-9
work_keys_str_mv AT malinowskikrzysztofpiotr healthtechnologyassessmentandreimbursementpolicyforoncologyorphandrugsincentralandeasterneurope
AT kawalecpaweł healthtechnologyassessmentandreimbursementpolicyforoncologyorphandrugsincentralandeasterneurope
AT trabkawojciech healthtechnologyassessmentandreimbursementpolicyforoncologyorphandrugsincentralandeasterneurope
AT sowadachristoph healthtechnologyassessmentandreimbursementpolicyforoncologyorphandrugsincentralandeasterneurope
AT petrovaguenka healthtechnologyassessmentandreimbursementpolicyforoncologyorphandrugsincentralandeasterneurope
AT manovamanoela healthtechnologyassessmentandreimbursementpolicyforoncologyorphandrugsincentralandeasterneurope
AT savovaalexandra healthtechnologyassessmentandreimbursementpolicyforoncologyorphandrugsincentralandeasterneurope
AT draganicpero healthtechnologyassessmentandreimbursementpolicyforoncologyorphandrugsincentralandeasterneurope
AT slabyjuraj healthtechnologyassessmentandreimbursementpolicyforoncologyorphandrugsincentralandeasterneurope
AT mannikagnes healthtechnologyassessmentandreimbursementpolicyforoncologyorphandrugsincentralandeasterneurope
AT markykristof healthtechnologyassessmentandreimbursementpolicyforoncologyorphandrugsincentralandeasterneurope
AT rugajazinta healthtechnologyassessmentandreimbursementpolicyforoncologyorphandrugsincentralandeasterneurope
AT gulbinovicjolanta healthtechnologyassessmentandreimbursementpolicyforoncologyorphandrugsincentralandeasterneurope
AT tesartomas healthtechnologyassessmentandreimbursementpolicyforoncologyorphandrugsincentralandeasterneurope
AT paveliumariansorin healthtechnologyassessmentandreimbursementpolicyforoncologyorphandrugsincentralandeasterneurope