Cargando…
How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability
BACKGROUND: In Danish GP training we had the ambition to enhance and assess global reflection ability, but since we found no appropriate validated method in the literature, we decided to develop a new assessment tool. This tool is based on individual trainee developed mind maps and structured traine...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02256-5 |
_version_ | 1783592124052144128 |
---|---|
author | Lillevang, Gunver Ibsen, Helle Prins, Søren Hast Kjaer, Niels Kristian |
author_facet | Lillevang, Gunver Ibsen, Helle Prins, Søren Hast Kjaer, Niels Kristian |
author_sort | Lillevang, Gunver |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In Danish GP training we had the ambition to enhance and assess global reflection ability, but since we found no appropriate validated method in the literature, we decided to develop a new assessment tool. This tool is based on individual trainee developed mind maps and structured trainer-trainee discussions related to specific complex competencies. We named the tool Global Assessment of Reflection ability (GAR) and conducted a mixed method validation study. Our goal was to investigate whether it is possible to enhance and assess reflection ability using the tool. METHODS: In order to investigate acceptability, feasibility, face validity, and construct validity of the tool we conducted a mixed method validation study that combined 1) qualitative data obtained from 750 GP trainers participating in train-the-trainer courses, 2) a questionnaire survey sent to 349 GP trainers and 214 GP trainees and 3) a thorough analysis of eight trainer-trainee discussions. RESULTS: Our study showed an immediate high acceptance of the GAR tool. Both trainers and trainees found the tool feasible, useful, and relevant with acceptable face validity. Rating of eight audio recordings showed that the tool can demonstrate reflection during assessment of complex competencies. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed an assessment tool (GAR) to enhance and assess reflection. GAR was found to be acceptable, feasible, relevant and with good face- and construct validity. GAR seems to be able to enhance the trainees’ ability to reflect and provide a good basis for assessment in relation to complex competencies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7545892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75458922020-10-13 How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability Lillevang, Gunver Ibsen, Helle Prins, Søren Hast Kjaer, Niels Kristian BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: In Danish GP training we had the ambition to enhance and assess global reflection ability, but since we found no appropriate validated method in the literature, we decided to develop a new assessment tool. This tool is based on individual trainee developed mind maps and structured trainer-trainee discussions related to specific complex competencies. We named the tool Global Assessment of Reflection ability (GAR) and conducted a mixed method validation study. Our goal was to investigate whether it is possible to enhance and assess reflection ability using the tool. METHODS: In order to investigate acceptability, feasibility, face validity, and construct validity of the tool we conducted a mixed method validation study that combined 1) qualitative data obtained from 750 GP trainers participating in train-the-trainer courses, 2) a questionnaire survey sent to 349 GP trainers and 214 GP trainees and 3) a thorough analysis of eight trainer-trainee discussions. RESULTS: Our study showed an immediate high acceptance of the GAR tool. Both trainers and trainees found the tool feasible, useful, and relevant with acceptable face validity. Rating of eight audio recordings showed that the tool can demonstrate reflection during assessment of complex competencies. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed an assessment tool (GAR) to enhance and assess reflection. GAR was found to be acceptable, feasible, relevant and with good face- and construct validity. GAR seems to be able to enhance the trainees’ ability to reflect and provide a good basis for assessment in relation to complex competencies. BioMed Central 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7545892/ /pubmed/33032573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02256-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lillevang, Gunver Ibsen, Helle Prins, Søren Hast Kjaer, Niels Kristian How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability |
title | How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability |
title_full | How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability |
title_fullStr | How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability |
title_full_unstemmed | How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability |
title_short | How to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability |
title_sort | how to enhance and assess reflection in specialist training: a mixed method validation study of a new tool for global assessment of reflection ability |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02256-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lillevanggunver howtoenhanceandassessreflectioninspecialisttrainingamixedmethodvalidationstudyofanewtoolforglobalassessmentofreflectionability AT ibsenhelle howtoenhanceandassessreflectioninspecialisttrainingamixedmethodvalidationstudyofanewtoolforglobalassessmentofreflectionability AT prinssørenhast howtoenhanceandassessreflectioninspecialisttrainingamixedmethodvalidationstudyofanewtoolforglobalassessmentofreflectionability AT kjaernielskristian howtoenhanceandassessreflectioninspecialisttrainingamixedmethodvalidationstudyofanewtoolforglobalassessmentofreflectionability |