Cargando…

Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Wound infection is a common complication following caesarean section. Factors influencing the risk of infection may include the suture material for skin closure, and closure of the subcutaneous fascia. We assessed the effect of skin closure with absorbable versus non-absorbable suture, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poprzeczny, Amanda J., Grivell, Rosalie M., Louise, Jennie, Deussen, Andrea R., Dodd, Jodie M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03305-z
_version_ 1783592124770418688
author Poprzeczny, Amanda J.
Grivell, Rosalie M.
Louise, Jennie
Deussen, Andrea R.
Dodd, Jodie M.
author_facet Poprzeczny, Amanda J.
Grivell, Rosalie M.
Louise, Jennie
Deussen, Andrea R.
Dodd, Jodie M.
author_sort Poprzeczny, Amanda J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Wound infection is a common complication following caesarean section. Factors influencing the risk of infection may include the suture material for skin closure, and closure of the subcutaneous fascia. We assessed the effect of skin closure with absorbable versus non-absorbable suture, and closure versus non-closure of the subcutaneous fascia on risk of wound infection following Caesarean section. METHODS: Women undergoing caesarean birth at an Adelaide maternity hospital were eligible for recruitment to a randomised trial using a 2 × 2 factorial design. Women were randomised to either closure or non-closure of the subcutaneous fascia and to subcuticular skin closure with an absorbable or non-absorbable suture. Participants were randomised to each of the two interventions into one of 4 possible groups: Group 1 - non-absorbable skin suture and non-closure of the subcutaneous fascia; Group 2 - absorbable skin suture and non-closure of the subcutaneous fascia; Group 3 - non-absorbable skin suture and closure of the subcutaneous fascia; and Group 4 - absorbable skin suture and closure of the subcutaneous fascia. The primary outcomes were reported wound infection and wound haematoma or seroma within the first 30 days after birth. RESULTS: A total of 851 women were recruited and randomised, with 849 women included in the analyses (Group 1: 216 women; Group 2: 212 women; Group 3: 212 women; Group 4: 211 women). In women who underwent fascia closure, there was a statistically significant increase in risk of wound infection within 30 days post-operatively for those who had skin closure with an absorbable suture (Group 4), compared with women who had skin closure with a non-absorbable suture (Group 3) (adjusted RR 2.17; 95% CI 1.05, 4.45; p = 0.035). There was no significant difference in risk of wound infection for absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures in women who did not undergo fascia closure. CONCLUSION: The combination of subcutaneous fascia closure and skin closure with an absorbable suture may be associated with an increased risk of reported wound infection after caesarean section. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12608000143325, on the 20th March, 2008.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7545895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75458952020-10-13 Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial Poprzeczny, Amanda J. Grivell, Rosalie M. Louise, Jennie Deussen, Andrea R. Dodd, Jodie M. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Wound infection is a common complication following caesarean section. Factors influencing the risk of infection may include the suture material for skin closure, and closure of the subcutaneous fascia. We assessed the effect of skin closure with absorbable versus non-absorbable suture, and closure versus non-closure of the subcutaneous fascia on risk of wound infection following Caesarean section. METHODS: Women undergoing caesarean birth at an Adelaide maternity hospital were eligible for recruitment to a randomised trial using a 2 × 2 factorial design. Women were randomised to either closure or non-closure of the subcutaneous fascia and to subcuticular skin closure with an absorbable or non-absorbable suture. Participants were randomised to each of the two interventions into one of 4 possible groups: Group 1 - non-absorbable skin suture and non-closure of the subcutaneous fascia; Group 2 - absorbable skin suture and non-closure of the subcutaneous fascia; Group 3 - non-absorbable skin suture and closure of the subcutaneous fascia; and Group 4 - absorbable skin suture and closure of the subcutaneous fascia. The primary outcomes were reported wound infection and wound haematoma or seroma within the first 30 days after birth. RESULTS: A total of 851 women were recruited and randomised, with 849 women included in the analyses (Group 1: 216 women; Group 2: 212 women; Group 3: 212 women; Group 4: 211 women). In women who underwent fascia closure, there was a statistically significant increase in risk of wound infection within 30 days post-operatively for those who had skin closure with an absorbable suture (Group 4), compared with women who had skin closure with a non-absorbable suture (Group 3) (adjusted RR 2.17; 95% CI 1.05, 4.45; p = 0.035). There was no significant difference in risk of wound infection for absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures in women who did not undergo fascia closure. CONCLUSION: The combination of subcutaneous fascia closure and skin closure with an absorbable suture may be associated with an increased risk of reported wound infection after caesarean section. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12608000143325, on the 20th March, 2008. BioMed Central 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7545895/ /pubmed/33032560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03305-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Poprzeczny, Amanda J.
Grivell, Rosalie M.
Louise, Jennie
Deussen, Andrea R.
Dodd, Jodie M.
Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial
title Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial
title_full Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial
title_fullStr Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial
title_short Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial
title_sort skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03305-z
work_keys_str_mv AT poprzecznyamandaj skinandsubcutaneousfasciaclosureatcaesareansectiontoreducewoundcomplicationstheclosurerandomisedtrial
AT grivellrosaliem skinandsubcutaneousfasciaclosureatcaesareansectiontoreducewoundcomplicationstheclosurerandomisedtrial
AT louisejennie skinandsubcutaneousfasciaclosureatcaesareansectiontoreducewoundcomplicationstheclosurerandomisedtrial
AT deussenandrear skinandsubcutaneousfasciaclosureatcaesareansectiontoreducewoundcomplicationstheclosurerandomisedtrial
AT doddjodiem skinandsubcutaneousfasciaclosureatcaesareansectiontoreducewoundcomplicationstheclosurerandomisedtrial