Cargando…
Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases
BACKGROUND: Despite the various treatment protocols available, survival evaluation is a fundamental criterion for the definition of surgical management; there are still many inconsistencies in the literature on this topic, especially in terms of the value of surgery and its morbidity in patients wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7546046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33100771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_72_20 |
_version_ | 1783592154060292096 |
---|---|
author | de Andrade, Erion Junior Formentin, Cleiton Martins, Samilly Conceição Maia Maeda, Fernando Luis Turolo, Otávio de Vasconcelos, Victor Leal Ghizoni, Enrico Tedeschi, Helder Joaquim, Andrei Fernandes |
author_facet | de Andrade, Erion Junior Formentin, Cleiton Martins, Samilly Conceição Maia Maeda, Fernando Luis Turolo, Otávio de Vasconcelos, Victor Leal Ghizoni, Enrico Tedeschi, Helder Joaquim, Andrei Fernandes |
author_sort | de Andrade, Erion Junior |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the various treatment protocols available, survival evaluation is a fundamental criterion for the definition of surgical management; there are still many inconsistencies in the literature on this topic, especially in terms of the value of surgery and its morbidity in patients with very short survival. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to analyze the association of clinical, oncological, and surgical factors in the survival of patients undergoing spinal surgery for spinal metastases (SM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of forty patients who were surgically treated at our institution for SM between 2010 and 2018 were included in the study. We applied the prognostic scales of Tomita and Tokuhashi in each patient and evaluated the systemic status using Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale. Survival rate in months was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier curve, with death considered as primary outcome and, for the evaluation of the association between the variables, the Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, or Fisher–Freeman–Halton test was applied for better survival. The level of statistical significance was considered as 5% (P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: The mean survival was 8.4 months. Patients with KPS <70 had a mean survival of 6.36 months, while those with KPS >70 had a mean survival of 14.48 months (P = 0.04). The mean survival of patients classified as ECOG 2 was 7.05 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4–10.7), and that of patients classified as ECOG 3 and 4 was 1.24 months (95% CI: 0.8–1.59). The mean survival rate among the patients with unresectable metastases in other organs was 6.3 months (95% CI: 3.9–8.9), while the survival rate of those who did not have metastases was 13.8 months (95% CI: 10.0–17.68; P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Survival was associated with the preoperative functional status defined by the KPS and ECOG scales and with the presence of nonresectable visceral metastases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7546046 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75460462020-10-22 Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases de Andrade, Erion Junior Formentin, Cleiton Martins, Samilly Conceição Maia Maeda, Fernando Luis Turolo, Otávio de Vasconcelos, Victor Leal Ghizoni, Enrico Tedeschi, Helder Joaquim, Andrei Fernandes J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite the various treatment protocols available, survival evaluation is a fundamental criterion for the definition of surgical management; there are still many inconsistencies in the literature on this topic, especially in terms of the value of surgery and its morbidity in patients with very short survival. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to analyze the association of clinical, oncological, and surgical factors in the survival of patients undergoing spinal surgery for spinal metastases (SM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of forty patients who were surgically treated at our institution for SM between 2010 and 2018 were included in the study. We applied the prognostic scales of Tomita and Tokuhashi in each patient and evaluated the systemic status using Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale. Survival rate in months was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier curve, with death considered as primary outcome and, for the evaluation of the association between the variables, the Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, or Fisher–Freeman–Halton test was applied for better survival. The level of statistical significance was considered as 5% (P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: The mean survival was 8.4 months. Patients with KPS <70 had a mean survival of 6.36 months, while those with KPS >70 had a mean survival of 14.48 months (P = 0.04). The mean survival of patients classified as ECOG 2 was 7.05 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4–10.7), and that of patients classified as ECOG 3 and 4 was 1.24 months (95% CI: 0.8–1.59). The mean survival rate among the patients with unresectable metastases in other organs was 6.3 months (95% CI: 3.9–8.9), while the survival rate of those who did not have metastases was 13.8 months (95% CI: 10.0–17.68; P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Survival was associated with the preoperative functional status defined by the KPS and ECOG scales and with the presence of nonresectable visceral metastases. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7546046/ /pubmed/33100771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_72_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article de Andrade, Erion Junior Formentin, Cleiton Martins, Samilly Conceição Maia Maeda, Fernando Luis Turolo, Otávio de Vasconcelos, Victor Leal Ghizoni, Enrico Tedeschi, Helder Joaquim, Andrei Fernandes Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases |
title | Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases |
title_full | Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases |
title_fullStr | Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases |
title_short | Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases |
title_sort | survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7546046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33100771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_72_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deandradeerionjunior survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases AT formentincleiton survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases AT martinssamillyconceicaomaia survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases AT maedafernandoluis survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases AT turolootavio survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases AT devasconcelosvictorleal survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases AT ghizonienrico survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases AT tedeschihelder survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases AT joaquimandreifernandes survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases |