Cargando…

Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases

BACKGROUND: Despite the various treatment protocols available, survival evaluation is a fundamental criterion for the definition of surgical management; there are still many inconsistencies in the literature on this topic, especially in terms of the value of surgery and its morbidity in patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Andrade, Erion Junior, Formentin, Cleiton, Martins, Samilly Conceição Maia, Maeda, Fernando Luis, Turolo, Otávio, de Vasconcelos, Victor Leal, Ghizoni, Enrico, Tedeschi, Helder, Joaquim, Andrei Fernandes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7546046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33100771
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_72_20
_version_ 1783592154060292096
author de Andrade, Erion Junior
Formentin, Cleiton
Martins, Samilly Conceição Maia
Maeda, Fernando Luis
Turolo, Otávio
de Vasconcelos, Victor Leal
Ghizoni, Enrico
Tedeschi, Helder
Joaquim, Andrei Fernandes
author_facet de Andrade, Erion Junior
Formentin, Cleiton
Martins, Samilly Conceição Maia
Maeda, Fernando Luis
Turolo, Otávio
de Vasconcelos, Victor Leal
Ghizoni, Enrico
Tedeschi, Helder
Joaquim, Andrei Fernandes
author_sort de Andrade, Erion Junior
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the various treatment protocols available, survival evaluation is a fundamental criterion for the definition of surgical management; there are still many inconsistencies in the literature on this topic, especially in terms of the value of surgery and its morbidity in patients with very short survival. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to analyze the association of clinical, oncological, and surgical factors in the survival of patients undergoing spinal surgery for spinal metastases (SM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of forty patients who were surgically treated at our institution for SM between 2010 and 2018 were included in the study. We applied the prognostic scales of Tomita and Tokuhashi in each patient and evaluated the systemic status using Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale. Survival rate in months was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier curve, with death considered as primary outcome and, for the evaluation of the association between the variables, the Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, or Fisher–Freeman–Halton test was applied for better survival. The level of statistical significance was considered as 5% (P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: The mean survival was 8.4 months. Patients with KPS <70 had a mean survival of 6.36 months, while those with KPS >70 had a mean survival of 14.48 months (P = 0.04). The mean survival of patients classified as ECOG 2 was 7.05 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4–10.7), and that of patients classified as ECOG 3 and 4 was 1.24 months (95% CI: 0.8–1.59). The mean survival rate among the patients with unresectable metastases in other organs was 6.3 months (95% CI: 3.9–8.9), while the survival rate of those who did not have metastases was 13.8 months (95% CI: 10.0–17.68; P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Survival was associated with the preoperative functional status defined by the KPS and ECOG scales and with the presence of nonresectable visceral metastases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7546046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75460462020-10-22 Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases de Andrade, Erion Junior Formentin, Cleiton Martins, Samilly Conceição Maia Maeda, Fernando Luis Turolo, Otávio de Vasconcelos, Victor Leal Ghizoni, Enrico Tedeschi, Helder Joaquim, Andrei Fernandes J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite the various treatment protocols available, survival evaluation is a fundamental criterion for the definition of surgical management; there are still many inconsistencies in the literature on this topic, especially in terms of the value of surgery and its morbidity in patients with very short survival. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to analyze the association of clinical, oncological, and surgical factors in the survival of patients undergoing spinal surgery for spinal metastases (SM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of forty patients who were surgically treated at our institution for SM between 2010 and 2018 were included in the study. We applied the prognostic scales of Tomita and Tokuhashi in each patient and evaluated the systemic status using Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale. Survival rate in months was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier curve, with death considered as primary outcome and, for the evaluation of the association between the variables, the Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, or Fisher–Freeman–Halton test was applied for better survival. The level of statistical significance was considered as 5% (P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: The mean survival was 8.4 months. Patients with KPS <70 had a mean survival of 6.36 months, while those with KPS >70 had a mean survival of 14.48 months (P = 0.04). The mean survival of patients classified as ECOG 2 was 7.05 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4–10.7), and that of patients classified as ECOG 3 and 4 was 1.24 months (95% CI: 0.8–1.59). The mean survival rate among the patients with unresectable metastases in other organs was 6.3 months (95% CI: 3.9–8.9), while the survival rate of those who did not have metastases was 13.8 months (95% CI: 10.0–17.68; P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Survival was associated with the preoperative functional status defined by the KPS and ECOG scales and with the presence of nonresectable visceral metastases. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7546046/ /pubmed/33100771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_72_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
de Andrade, Erion Junior
Formentin, Cleiton
Martins, Samilly Conceição Maia
Maeda, Fernando Luis
Turolo, Otávio
de Vasconcelos, Victor Leal
Ghizoni, Enrico
Tedeschi, Helder
Joaquim, Andrei Fernandes
Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases
title Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases
title_full Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases
title_fullStr Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases
title_full_unstemmed Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases
title_short Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases
title_sort survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7546046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33100771
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_72_20
work_keys_str_mv AT deandradeerionjunior survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases
AT formentincleiton survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases
AT martinssamillyconceicaomaia survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases
AT maedafernandoluis survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases
AT turolootavio survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases
AT devasconcelosvictorleal survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases
AT ghizonienrico survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases
AT tedeschihelder survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases
AT joaquimandreifernandes survivalinpatientswithsurgicallytreatedspinalmetastases