Cargando…

Objective assessment of mouth opening after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: A prospective study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) is frequently used for the reconstruction of urethral strictures with acceptable donor-site morbidity after graft harvest. There are only a few prospectively designed studies with a small number of patients reporting oral complications, particu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Kaushal, Kalathia, Jaisukh, Krishnamoorthy, Venkatesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7546065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33100752
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_84_19
_version_ 1783592158505205760
author Patel, Kaushal
Kalathia, Jaisukh
Krishnamoorthy, Venkatesh
author_facet Patel, Kaushal
Kalathia, Jaisukh
Krishnamoorthy, Venkatesh
author_sort Patel, Kaushal
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) is frequently used for the reconstruction of urethral strictures with acceptable donor-site morbidity after graft harvest. There are only a few prospectively designed studies with a small number of patients reporting oral complications, particularly the mouth opening in the long terms. We did an objective assessment of mouth opening before and after 6 months of BMG urethroplasty as well as pain scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients who underwent BMG urethroplasty were included in the study between May 2013 and December 2014. Preoperative mouth opening (reference point between two incisors with the highest of three readings taken as final) was measured using a Vernier caliper. Harvest site was left open to heal by secondary intentions. Postoperatively, mouth opening and pain scores using self-administered (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) assessed on day 1 and day 3, and follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months. Data were analyzed as mean (standard deviation [SD]), proportion, and median (inter-quartile range [IQR]) with two-tailedP < 0.05 as statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean age was 39.6 years. The graft was harvested from a single cheek in 50% of patients. In remaining, it was taken from both cheeks, both cheeks with lip, and both cheeks with the tongue in 29.31%, 17.24%, and 3.5%, of patients, respectively. Preoperative mouth opening (5.13 cm [0.08]) was statistically significantly more than mouth opening on day 1 (4.34 cm [0.09]), day 3 (4.48 [0.09]), and day 7 (4.69 cm [0.09]). Mean difference became insignificant at the interval of 1 month (4.91 cm [0.09]) with 6 months’ values showing marginal improvement over preoperative values (5.14 cm [0.07]). Pain was tolerable and patients reported low median VAS 2 (2–4) on day 1 and day 3 each. Reported median VAS became 0 (0–0) on day 7. CONCLUSION: Mouth opening restriction after BMG urethroplasty is a definite entity in the initial postoperative period, which becomes nonsignificant by 6 months. The pain has no effect on mouth opening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7546065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75460652020-10-22 Objective assessment of mouth opening after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: A prospective study Patel, Kaushal Kalathia, Jaisukh Krishnamoorthy, Venkatesh Urol Ann Original Article INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) is frequently used for the reconstruction of urethral strictures with acceptable donor-site morbidity after graft harvest. There are only a few prospectively designed studies with a small number of patients reporting oral complications, particularly the mouth opening in the long terms. We did an objective assessment of mouth opening before and after 6 months of BMG urethroplasty as well as pain scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients who underwent BMG urethroplasty were included in the study between May 2013 and December 2014. Preoperative mouth opening (reference point between two incisors with the highest of three readings taken as final) was measured using a Vernier caliper. Harvest site was left open to heal by secondary intentions. Postoperatively, mouth opening and pain scores using self-administered (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) assessed on day 1 and day 3, and follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months. Data were analyzed as mean (standard deviation [SD]), proportion, and median (inter-quartile range [IQR]) with two-tailedP < 0.05 as statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean age was 39.6 years. The graft was harvested from a single cheek in 50% of patients. In remaining, it was taken from both cheeks, both cheeks with lip, and both cheeks with the tongue in 29.31%, 17.24%, and 3.5%, of patients, respectively. Preoperative mouth opening (5.13 cm [0.08]) was statistically significantly more than mouth opening on day 1 (4.34 cm [0.09]), day 3 (4.48 [0.09]), and day 7 (4.69 cm [0.09]). Mean difference became insignificant at the interval of 1 month (4.91 cm [0.09]) with 6 months’ values showing marginal improvement over preoperative values (5.14 cm [0.07]). Pain was tolerable and patients reported low median VAS 2 (2–4) on day 1 and day 3 each. Reported median VAS became 0 (0–0) on day 7. CONCLUSION: Mouth opening restriction after BMG urethroplasty is a definite entity in the initial postoperative period, which becomes nonsignificant by 6 months. The pain has no effect on mouth opening. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7546065/ /pubmed/33100752 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_84_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Patel, Kaushal
Kalathia, Jaisukh
Krishnamoorthy, Venkatesh
Objective assessment of mouth opening after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: A prospective study
title Objective assessment of mouth opening after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: A prospective study
title_full Objective assessment of mouth opening after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: A prospective study
title_fullStr Objective assessment of mouth opening after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: A prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Objective assessment of mouth opening after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: A prospective study
title_short Objective assessment of mouth opening after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: A prospective study
title_sort objective assessment of mouth opening after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: a prospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7546065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33100752
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_84_19
work_keys_str_mv AT patelkaushal objectiveassessmentofmouthopeningafterbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyaprospectivestudy
AT kalathiajaisukh objectiveassessmentofmouthopeningafterbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyaprospectivestudy
AT krishnamoorthyvenkatesh objectiveassessmentofmouthopeningafterbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyaprospectivestudy