Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness and return on investment of protecting health workers in low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND: In this paper, we predict the health and economic consequences of immediate investment in personal protective equipment (PPE) for health care workers (HCWs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: To account for health consequences, we estimated mortality for HCWs and prese...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Risko, Nicholas, Werner, Kalin, Offorjebe, O. Agatha, Vecino-Ortiz, Andres I., Wallis, Lee A., Razzak, Junaid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7546502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33035244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240503
_version_ 1783592242195202048
author Risko, Nicholas
Werner, Kalin
Offorjebe, O. Agatha
Vecino-Ortiz, Andres I.
Wallis, Lee A.
Razzak, Junaid
author_facet Risko, Nicholas
Werner, Kalin
Offorjebe, O. Agatha
Vecino-Ortiz, Andres I.
Wallis, Lee A.
Razzak, Junaid
author_sort Risko, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In this paper, we predict the health and economic consequences of immediate investment in personal protective equipment (PPE) for health care workers (HCWs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: To account for health consequences, we estimated mortality for HCWs and present a cost-effectiveness and return on investment (ROI) analysis using a decision-analytic model with Bayesian multivariate sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulation. Data sources included inputs from the World Health Organization Essential Supplies Forecasting Tool and the Imperial College of London epidemiologic model. RESULTS: An investment of $9.6 billion USD would adequately protect HCWs in all LMICs. This intervention would save 2,299,543 lives across LMICs, costing $59 USD per HCW case averted and $4,309 USD per HCW life saved. The societal ROI would be $755.3 billion USD, the equivalent of a 7,932% return. Regional and national estimates are also presented. DISCUSSION: In scenarios where PPE remains scarce, 70–100% of HCWs will get infected, irrespective of nationwide social distancing policies. Maintaining HCW infection rates below 10% and mortality below 1% requires inclusion of a PPE scale-up strategy as part of the pandemic response. In conclusion, wide-scale procurement and distribution of PPE for LMICs is an essential strategy to prevent widespread HCW morbidity and mortality. It is cost-effective and yields a large downstream return on investment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7546502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75465022020-10-19 Cost-effectiveness and return on investment of protecting health workers in low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic Risko, Nicholas Werner, Kalin Offorjebe, O. Agatha Vecino-Ortiz, Andres I. Wallis, Lee A. Razzak, Junaid PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In this paper, we predict the health and economic consequences of immediate investment in personal protective equipment (PPE) for health care workers (HCWs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: To account for health consequences, we estimated mortality for HCWs and present a cost-effectiveness and return on investment (ROI) analysis using a decision-analytic model with Bayesian multivariate sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulation. Data sources included inputs from the World Health Organization Essential Supplies Forecasting Tool and the Imperial College of London epidemiologic model. RESULTS: An investment of $9.6 billion USD would adequately protect HCWs in all LMICs. This intervention would save 2,299,543 lives across LMICs, costing $59 USD per HCW case averted and $4,309 USD per HCW life saved. The societal ROI would be $755.3 billion USD, the equivalent of a 7,932% return. Regional and national estimates are also presented. DISCUSSION: In scenarios where PPE remains scarce, 70–100% of HCWs will get infected, irrespective of nationwide social distancing policies. Maintaining HCW infection rates below 10% and mortality below 1% requires inclusion of a PPE scale-up strategy as part of the pandemic response. In conclusion, wide-scale procurement and distribution of PPE for LMICs is an essential strategy to prevent widespread HCW morbidity and mortality. It is cost-effective and yields a large downstream return on investment. Public Library of Science 2020-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7546502/ /pubmed/33035244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240503 Text en © 2020 Risko et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Risko, Nicholas
Werner, Kalin
Offorjebe, O. Agatha
Vecino-Ortiz, Andres I.
Wallis, Lee A.
Razzak, Junaid
Cost-effectiveness and return on investment of protecting health workers in low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic
title Cost-effectiveness and return on investment of protecting health workers in low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Cost-effectiveness and return on investment of protecting health workers in low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness and return on investment of protecting health workers in low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness and return on investment of protecting health workers in low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Cost-effectiveness and return on investment of protecting health workers in low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort cost-effectiveness and return on investment of protecting health workers in low- and middle-income countries during the covid-19 pandemic
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7546502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33035244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240503
work_keys_str_mv AT riskonicholas costeffectivenessandreturnoninvestmentofprotectinghealthworkersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesduringthecovid19pandemic
AT wernerkalin costeffectivenessandreturnoninvestmentofprotectinghealthworkersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesduringthecovid19pandemic
AT offorjebeoagatha costeffectivenessandreturnoninvestmentofprotectinghealthworkersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesduringthecovid19pandemic
AT vecinoortizandresi costeffectivenessandreturnoninvestmentofprotectinghealthworkersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesduringthecovid19pandemic
AT wallisleea costeffectivenessandreturnoninvestmentofprotectinghealthworkersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesduringthecovid19pandemic
AT razzakjunaid costeffectivenessandreturnoninvestmentofprotectinghealthworkersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesduringthecovid19pandemic