Cargando…

Comparison of Bead-Based Fluorescence Versus Planar Electrochemiluminescence Multiplex Immunoassays for Measuring Cytokines in Human Plasma

This study compared two 96-well multiplex immunoassay platforms for analytical performance in assessing cytokine concentrations in standards, quality controls and human plasma samples (n = 62), and evaluated assay time requirements. Assays included a bead-based fluorescence MILLIPLEX(®) assay/Lumine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Günther, Anna, Becker, Matthias, Göpfert, Jens, Joos, Thomas, Schneiderhan-Marra, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7546899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.572634
_version_ 1783592318200184832
author Günther, Anna
Becker, Matthias
Göpfert, Jens
Joos, Thomas
Schneiderhan-Marra, Nicole
author_facet Günther, Anna
Becker, Matthias
Göpfert, Jens
Joos, Thomas
Schneiderhan-Marra, Nicole
author_sort Günther, Anna
collection PubMed
description This study compared two 96-well multiplex immunoassay platforms for analytical performance in assessing cytokine concentrations in standards, quality controls and human plasma samples (n = 62), and evaluated assay time requirements. Assays included a bead-based fluorescence MILLIPLEX(®) assay/Luminex fluorescence platform (LMX) and three kits from Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) in planar electrochemiluminescence format. The LMX kit evaluated 21 cytokines and the MSD kits evaluated 10 cytokines each, with 16 overlapping cytokines between platforms. Both assays provided good reproducibility in standard curves for all analytes. Interassay CVs of shared analytes showed average kit quality control CVs ranging 1.9–18.2% for LMX and 2.4–13.9% for MSD. The MSD platform had lower LLoQs than LMX for 14/16 shared cytokines. For IL-17, the LLoQ was lower with LMX than MSD, and the LLoQs for IL-6 were similar. Although MSD calibration curves indicated lower LLoQs for most of those analytes, many more cytokines in human plasma samples were not detected by MSD than by LMX. The ULoQs were higher in LMX versus MSD assays for 13/16 shared analytes, lower than MSD for IL-17, and equivalent between assays for IL-6 and MIP-1α. Bland-Altman plots indicated that MSD classified 13/16 shared analytes as concentrations lower than by LMX. Time and motion analysis indicated that total mean assay times were 20 h 28 m and 21 h 33 m for LMX and MSD, respectively, including an overnight (17 h) incubation. The MSD assays employed a manufacturer-approved overnight incubation instead of the standard 2-h incubation, which kit instructions suggest might increase detection sensitivity. Hands-on labor time averaged 1 h 37 m for LMX and 2 h 33 m for MSD. In summary, assay selection factors should include selection of specific markers of interest, time and cost considerations, and anticipated cytokine concentrations in prospective samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7546899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75468992020-10-22 Comparison of Bead-Based Fluorescence Versus Planar Electrochemiluminescence Multiplex Immunoassays for Measuring Cytokines in Human Plasma Günther, Anna Becker, Matthias Göpfert, Jens Joos, Thomas Schneiderhan-Marra, Nicole Front Immunol Immunology This study compared two 96-well multiplex immunoassay platforms for analytical performance in assessing cytokine concentrations in standards, quality controls and human plasma samples (n = 62), and evaluated assay time requirements. Assays included a bead-based fluorescence MILLIPLEX(®) assay/Luminex fluorescence platform (LMX) and three kits from Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) in planar electrochemiluminescence format. The LMX kit evaluated 21 cytokines and the MSD kits evaluated 10 cytokines each, with 16 overlapping cytokines between platforms. Both assays provided good reproducibility in standard curves for all analytes. Interassay CVs of shared analytes showed average kit quality control CVs ranging 1.9–18.2% for LMX and 2.4–13.9% for MSD. The MSD platform had lower LLoQs than LMX for 14/16 shared cytokines. For IL-17, the LLoQ was lower with LMX than MSD, and the LLoQs for IL-6 were similar. Although MSD calibration curves indicated lower LLoQs for most of those analytes, many more cytokines in human plasma samples were not detected by MSD than by LMX. The ULoQs were higher in LMX versus MSD assays for 13/16 shared analytes, lower than MSD for IL-17, and equivalent between assays for IL-6 and MIP-1α. Bland-Altman plots indicated that MSD classified 13/16 shared analytes as concentrations lower than by LMX. Time and motion analysis indicated that total mean assay times were 20 h 28 m and 21 h 33 m for LMX and MSD, respectively, including an overnight (17 h) incubation. The MSD assays employed a manufacturer-approved overnight incubation instead of the standard 2-h incubation, which kit instructions suggest might increase detection sensitivity. Hands-on labor time averaged 1 h 37 m for LMX and 2 h 33 m for MSD. In summary, assay selection factors should include selection of specific markers of interest, time and cost considerations, and anticipated cytokine concentrations in prospective samples. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7546899/ /pubmed/33101295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.572634 Text en Copyright © 2020 Günther, Becker, Göpfert, Joos and Schneiderhan-Marra. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Günther, Anna
Becker, Matthias
Göpfert, Jens
Joos, Thomas
Schneiderhan-Marra, Nicole
Comparison of Bead-Based Fluorescence Versus Planar Electrochemiluminescence Multiplex Immunoassays for Measuring Cytokines in Human Plasma
title Comparison of Bead-Based Fluorescence Versus Planar Electrochemiluminescence Multiplex Immunoassays for Measuring Cytokines in Human Plasma
title_full Comparison of Bead-Based Fluorescence Versus Planar Electrochemiluminescence Multiplex Immunoassays for Measuring Cytokines in Human Plasma
title_fullStr Comparison of Bead-Based Fluorescence Versus Planar Electrochemiluminescence Multiplex Immunoassays for Measuring Cytokines in Human Plasma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Bead-Based Fluorescence Versus Planar Electrochemiluminescence Multiplex Immunoassays for Measuring Cytokines in Human Plasma
title_short Comparison of Bead-Based Fluorescence Versus Planar Electrochemiluminescence Multiplex Immunoassays for Measuring Cytokines in Human Plasma
title_sort comparison of bead-based fluorescence versus planar electrochemiluminescence multiplex immunoassays for measuring cytokines in human plasma
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7546899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.572634
work_keys_str_mv AT guntheranna comparisonofbeadbasedfluorescenceversusplanarelectrochemiluminescencemultipleximmunoassaysformeasuringcytokinesinhumanplasma
AT beckermatthias comparisonofbeadbasedfluorescenceversusplanarelectrochemiluminescencemultipleximmunoassaysformeasuringcytokinesinhumanplasma
AT gopfertjens comparisonofbeadbasedfluorescenceversusplanarelectrochemiluminescencemultipleximmunoassaysformeasuringcytokinesinhumanplasma
AT joosthomas comparisonofbeadbasedfluorescenceversusplanarelectrochemiluminescencemultipleximmunoassaysformeasuringcytokinesinhumanplasma
AT schneiderhanmarranicole comparisonofbeadbasedfluorescenceversusplanarelectrochemiluminescencemultipleximmunoassaysformeasuringcytokinesinhumanplasma