Cargando…
Validation of two short versions of the Zarit Burden Interview in the palliative care setting: a questionnaire to assess the burden of informal caregivers
PURPOSE: Several validated outcome measures, among them the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), are valid for measuring caregiver burden in advanced cancer and dementia. However, they have not been validated for a wider palliative care (PC) setting with non-cancer disease. The purpose was to validate ZBI-...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7546983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32060707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05288-w |
_version_ | 1783592336810311680 |
---|---|
author | Kühnel, Martina B. Ramsenthaler, Christina Bausewein, Claudia Fegg, Martin Hodiamont, Farina |
author_facet | Kühnel, Martina B. Ramsenthaler, Christina Bausewein, Claudia Fegg, Martin Hodiamont, Farina |
author_sort | Kühnel, Martina B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Several validated outcome measures, among them the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), are valid for measuring caregiver burden in advanced cancer and dementia. However, they have not been validated for a wider palliative care (PC) setting with non-cancer disease. The purpose was to validate ZBI-1 (ultra-short version and proxy rating) and ZBI-7 short versions for PC. METHODS: In a prospective, cross-sectional study with informal caregivers of patients in inpatient (PC unit, hospital palliative support team) and outpatient (home care team) PC settings of a large university hospital, content validity and acceptability of the ZBI and its structural validity (via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis) were tested. Reliability assessment used internal consistency and inter-rater reliability and construct validity used known-group comparisons and a priori hypotheses on correlations with Brief Symptom Inventory, Short Form-12, and Distress Thermometer. RESULTS: Eighty-four participants (63.1% women; mean age 59.8, SD 14.4) were included. Structural validity assessment confirmed the unidimensional structure of ZBI-7 both in CFA and Rasch analysis. The item on overall burden was the best item for the ultra-short version ZBI-1. Higher burden was recorded for women and those with poorer physical health. Internal consistency was good (Cronbach’s α = 0.83). Inter-rater reliability was moderate as proxy ratings estimated caregivers’ burden higher than self-ratings (average measures ICC = 0.51; CI = 0.23–.69; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The ZBI-7 is a valid instrument for measuring caregiver burden in PC. The ultra-short ZBI-1 can be used as a quick and proxy assessment, with the caveat of overestimating burden. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-019-05288-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7546983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75469832020-10-19 Validation of two short versions of the Zarit Burden Interview in the palliative care setting: a questionnaire to assess the burden of informal caregivers Kühnel, Martina B. Ramsenthaler, Christina Bausewein, Claudia Fegg, Martin Hodiamont, Farina Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Several validated outcome measures, among them the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), are valid for measuring caregiver burden in advanced cancer and dementia. However, they have not been validated for a wider palliative care (PC) setting with non-cancer disease. The purpose was to validate ZBI-1 (ultra-short version and proxy rating) and ZBI-7 short versions for PC. METHODS: In a prospective, cross-sectional study with informal caregivers of patients in inpatient (PC unit, hospital palliative support team) and outpatient (home care team) PC settings of a large university hospital, content validity and acceptability of the ZBI and its structural validity (via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis) were tested. Reliability assessment used internal consistency and inter-rater reliability and construct validity used known-group comparisons and a priori hypotheses on correlations with Brief Symptom Inventory, Short Form-12, and Distress Thermometer. RESULTS: Eighty-four participants (63.1% women; mean age 59.8, SD 14.4) were included. Structural validity assessment confirmed the unidimensional structure of ZBI-7 both in CFA and Rasch analysis. The item on overall burden was the best item for the ultra-short version ZBI-1. Higher burden was recorded for women and those with poorer physical health. Internal consistency was good (Cronbach’s α = 0.83). Inter-rater reliability was moderate as proxy ratings estimated caregivers’ burden higher than self-ratings (average measures ICC = 0.51; CI = 0.23–.69; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The ZBI-7 is a valid instrument for measuring caregiver burden in PC. The ultra-short ZBI-1 can be used as a quick and proxy assessment, with the caveat of overestimating burden. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-019-05288-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-15 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7546983/ /pubmed/32060707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05288-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kühnel, Martina B. Ramsenthaler, Christina Bausewein, Claudia Fegg, Martin Hodiamont, Farina Validation of two short versions of the Zarit Burden Interview in the palliative care setting: a questionnaire to assess the burden of informal caregivers |
title | Validation of two short versions of the Zarit Burden Interview in the palliative care setting: a questionnaire to assess the burden of informal caregivers |
title_full | Validation of two short versions of the Zarit Burden Interview in the palliative care setting: a questionnaire to assess the burden of informal caregivers |
title_fullStr | Validation of two short versions of the Zarit Burden Interview in the palliative care setting: a questionnaire to assess the burden of informal caregivers |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of two short versions of the Zarit Burden Interview in the palliative care setting: a questionnaire to assess the burden of informal caregivers |
title_short | Validation of two short versions of the Zarit Burden Interview in the palliative care setting: a questionnaire to assess the burden of informal caregivers |
title_sort | validation of two short versions of the zarit burden interview in the palliative care setting: a questionnaire to assess the burden of informal caregivers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7546983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32060707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05288-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuhnelmartinab validationoftwoshortversionsofthezaritburdeninterviewinthepalliativecaresettingaquestionnairetoassesstheburdenofinformalcaregivers AT ramsenthalerchristina validationoftwoshortversionsofthezaritburdeninterviewinthepalliativecaresettingaquestionnairetoassesstheburdenofinformalcaregivers AT bauseweinclaudia validationoftwoshortversionsofthezaritburdeninterviewinthepalliativecaresettingaquestionnairetoassesstheburdenofinformalcaregivers AT feggmartin validationoftwoshortversionsofthezaritburdeninterviewinthepalliativecaresettingaquestionnairetoassesstheburdenofinformalcaregivers AT hodiamontfarina validationoftwoshortversionsofthezaritburdeninterviewinthepalliativecaresettingaquestionnairetoassesstheburdenofinformalcaregivers |