Cargando…

Taking the Analysis of Trial-Based Economic Evaluations to the Next Level: The Importance of Accounting for Clustering

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the performance and impact of multilevel modelling (MLM) compared with ordinary least squares (OLS) regression in trial-based economic evaluations with clustered data. METHODS: Three thousand datasets with balanced and unbalanced clusters were simulate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El Alili, Mohamed, van Dongen, Johanna M., Goldfeld, Keith S., Heymans, Martijn W., van Tulder, Maurits W., Bosmans, Judith E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7546992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32729091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00946-y
_version_ 1783592338976669696
author El Alili, Mohamed
van Dongen, Johanna M.
Goldfeld, Keith S.
Heymans, Martijn W.
van Tulder, Maurits W.
Bosmans, Judith E.
author_facet El Alili, Mohamed
van Dongen, Johanna M.
Goldfeld, Keith S.
Heymans, Martijn W.
van Tulder, Maurits W.
Bosmans, Judith E.
author_sort El Alili, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the performance and impact of multilevel modelling (MLM) compared with ordinary least squares (OLS) regression in trial-based economic evaluations with clustered data. METHODS: Three thousand datasets with balanced and unbalanced clusters were simulated with correlation coefficients between costs and effects of − 0.5, 0, and 0.5, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) varying between 0.05 and 0.30. Each scenario was analyzed using both MLM and OLS. Statistical uncertainty around MLM and OLS estimates was estimated using bootstrapping. Performance measures were estimated and compared between approaches, including bias, root mean squared error (RMSE) and coverage probability. Cost and effect differences, and their corresponding confidence intervals and standard errors, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, incremental net-monetary benefits and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were compared. RESULTS: Cost-effectiveness outcomes were similar between OLS and MLM. MLM produced larger statistical uncertainty and coverage probabilities closer to nominal levels than OLS. The higher the ICC, the larger the effect on statistical uncertainty between MLM and OLS. Significant cost-effectiveness outcomes as estimated by OLS became non-significant when estimated by MLM. At all ICCs, MLM resulted in lower probabilities of cost effectiveness than OLS, and this difference became larger with increasing ICCs. Performance measures and cost-effectiveness outcomes were similar across scenarios with varying correlation coefficients between costs and effects. CONCLUSIONS: Although OLS produced similar cost-effectiveness outcomes, it substantially underestimated the amount of variation in the data compared with MLM. To prevent suboptimal conclusions and a possible waste of scarce resources, it is important to use MLM in trial-based economic evaluations when data are clustered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-020-00946-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7546992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75469922020-10-19 Taking the Analysis of Trial-Based Economic Evaluations to the Next Level: The Importance of Accounting for Clustering El Alili, Mohamed van Dongen, Johanna M. Goldfeld, Keith S. Heymans, Martijn W. van Tulder, Maurits W. Bosmans, Judith E. Pharmacoeconomics Original Research OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the performance and impact of multilevel modelling (MLM) compared with ordinary least squares (OLS) regression in trial-based economic evaluations with clustered data. METHODS: Three thousand datasets with balanced and unbalanced clusters were simulated with correlation coefficients between costs and effects of − 0.5, 0, and 0.5, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) varying between 0.05 and 0.30. Each scenario was analyzed using both MLM and OLS. Statistical uncertainty around MLM and OLS estimates was estimated using bootstrapping. Performance measures were estimated and compared between approaches, including bias, root mean squared error (RMSE) and coverage probability. Cost and effect differences, and their corresponding confidence intervals and standard errors, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, incremental net-monetary benefits and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were compared. RESULTS: Cost-effectiveness outcomes were similar between OLS and MLM. MLM produced larger statistical uncertainty and coverage probabilities closer to nominal levels than OLS. The higher the ICC, the larger the effect on statistical uncertainty between MLM and OLS. Significant cost-effectiveness outcomes as estimated by OLS became non-significant when estimated by MLM. At all ICCs, MLM resulted in lower probabilities of cost effectiveness than OLS, and this difference became larger with increasing ICCs. Performance measures and cost-effectiveness outcomes were similar across scenarios with varying correlation coefficients between costs and effects. CONCLUSIONS: Although OLS produced similar cost-effectiveness outcomes, it substantially underestimated the amount of variation in the data compared with MLM. To prevent suboptimal conclusions and a possible waste of scarce resources, it is important to use MLM in trial-based economic evaluations when data are clustered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-020-00946-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-30 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7546992/ /pubmed/32729091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00946-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
El Alili, Mohamed
van Dongen, Johanna M.
Goldfeld, Keith S.
Heymans, Martijn W.
van Tulder, Maurits W.
Bosmans, Judith E.
Taking the Analysis of Trial-Based Economic Evaluations to the Next Level: The Importance of Accounting for Clustering
title Taking the Analysis of Trial-Based Economic Evaluations to the Next Level: The Importance of Accounting for Clustering
title_full Taking the Analysis of Trial-Based Economic Evaluations to the Next Level: The Importance of Accounting for Clustering
title_fullStr Taking the Analysis of Trial-Based Economic Evaluations to the Next Level: The Importance of Accounting for Clustering
title_full_unstemmed Taking the Analysis of Trial-Based Economic Evaluations to the Next Level: The Importance of Accounting for Clustering
title_short Taking the Analysis of Trial-Based Economic Evaluations to the Next Level: The Importance of Accounting for Clustering
title_sort taking the analysis of trial-based economic evaluations to the next level: the importance of accounting for clustering
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7546992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32729091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00946-y
work_keys_str_mv AT elalilimohamed takingtheanalysisoftrialbasedeconomicevaluationstothenextleveltheimportanceofaccountingforclustering
AT vandongenjohannam takingtheanalysisoftrialbasedeconomicevaluationstothenextleveltheimportanceofaccountingforclustering
AT goldfeldkeiths takingtheanalysisoftrialbasedeconomicevaluationstothenextleveltheimportanceofaccountingforclustering
AT heymansmartijnw takingtheanalysisoftrialbasedeconomicevaluationstothenextleveltheimportanceofaccountingforclustering
AT vantuldermauritsw takingtheanalysisoftrialbasedeconomicevaluationstothenextleveltheimportanceofaccountingforclustering
AT bosmansjudithe takingtheanalysisoftrialbasedeconomicevaluationstothenextleveltheimportanceofaccountingforclustering