Cargando…

Regional Lymph Node Involvement Among Patients With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer

IMPORTANCE: Regional nodal irradiation (RNI) for node-positive breast cancer reduces distant metastases and improves survival, albeit with limited reduction in regional nodal recurrences. The mechanism by which RNI robustly reduces distant metastases while modestly influencing nodal recurrences (ie,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bitencourt, Almir, Rossi Saccarelli, Carolina, Morris, Elizabeth A., Flynn, Jessica, Zhang, Zhigang, Khan, Atif, Gillespie, Erin, Cahlon, Oren, Mueller, Boris, Cuaron, John J., McCormick, Beryl, Powell, Simon N., Plitas, George, Razavi, Pedram, Pinker, Katja, Riedl, Christopher C., Sutton, Elizabeth J., Braunstein, Lior Z.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33034638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18790
_version_ 1783592404898545664
author Bitencourt, Almir
Rossi Saccarelli, Carolina
Morris, Elizabeth A.
Flynn, Jessica
Zhang, Zhigang
Khan, Atif
Gillespie, Erin
Cahlon, Oren
Mueller, Boris
Cuaron, John J.
McCormick, Beryl
Powell, Simon N.
Plitas, George
Razavi, Pedram
Pinker, Katja
Riedl, Christopher C.
Sutton, Elizabeth J.
Braunstein, Lior Z.
author_facet Bitencourt, Almir
Rossi Saccarelli, Carolina
Morris, Elizabeth A.
Flynn, Jessica
Zhang, Zhigang
Khan, Atif
Gillespie, Erin
Cahlon, Oren
Mueller, Boris
Cuaron, John J.
McCormick, Beryl
Powell, Simon N.
Plitas, George
Razavi, Pedram
Pinker, Katja
Riedl, Christopher C.
Sutton, Elizabeth J.
Braunstein, Lior Z.
author_sort Bitencourt, Almir
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Regional nodal irradiation (RNI) for node-positive breast cancer reduces distant metastases and improves survival, albeit with limited reduction in regional nodal recurrences. The mechanism by which RNI robustly reduces distant metastases while modestly influencing nodal recurrences (ie, the presumed target of RNI) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether some distant metastases putatively arise from occult regional nodal disease and whether regional recurrences otherwise remain largely undetected until an advanced cancer presentation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study examined patients presenting with de novo stage IV breast cancer to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York, from 2006 to 2018. Medical records were reviewed to ascertain clinicopathological parameters, including estrogen receptor status and survival. Pretreatment positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging was reviewed to ascertain the extent of regional nodal involvement at metastatic diagnosis using standard nodal assessment criteria. A subset underwent regional lymph node biopsy for diagnostic confirmation and served to validate the radiographic nodal assessment. Data analysis was performed from October 2019 to February 2020. EXPOSURES: Untreated metastatic breast cancer. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the likelihood of regional nodal involvement at the time of metastatic breast cancer presentation and was determined by reviewing pretreatment PET-CT imaging and lymph node biopsy findings. RESULTS: Among 597 women (median [interquartile range] age, 53 [44–65] years) with untreated metastatic breast cancer, 512 (85.8%) exhibited regional lymph node involvement by PET-CT or nodal biopsy, 509 (85%) had involvement of axillary level I, 328 (55%) had involvement in axillary level II, 136 (23%) had involvement in axillary level III, 101 (17%) had involvement in the supraclavicular fossa, and 96 (16%) had involvement in the internal mammary chain. Lymph node involvement was more prevalent among estrogen receptor–negative tumors (92.4%) than estrogen receptor–positive tumors (83.6%). Nodal involvement at the time of metastatic diagnosis was not associated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that a majority of patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer harbor regional lymph node disease at presentation, consistent with the hypothesis that regional involvement may precede metastatic dissemination. This is in alignment with the findings of landmark trials suggesting that RNI reduces distant recurrences. It is possible that this distant effect of RNI may act via eradication of occult regional disease prior to systemic seeding. The challenges inherent in detecting isolated nodal disease (which is typically asymptomatic) may account for the more modest observed benefit of RNI on regional recurrences. Alternative explanations of nodal involvement that arises concurrently or after metastatic dissemination remain possible, but do not otherwise explain the association of RNI with distant recurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7547365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75473652020-10-20 Regional Lymph Node Involvement Among Patients With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer Bitencourt, Almir Rossi Saccarelli, Carolina Morris, Elizabeth A. Flynn, Jessica Zhang, Zhigang Khan, Atif Gillespie, Erin Cahlon, Oren Mueller, Boris Cuaron, John J. McCormick, Beryl Powell, Simon N. Plitas, George Razavi, Pedram Pinker, Katja Riedl, Christopher C. Sutton, Elizabeth J. Braunstein, Lior Z. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Regional nodal irradiation (RNI) for node-positive breast cancer reduces distant metastases and improves survival, albeit with limited reduction in regional nodal recurrences. The mechanism by which RNI robustly reduces distant metastases while modestly influencing nodal recurrences (ie, the presumed target of RNI) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether some distant metastases putatively arise from occult regional nodal disease and whether regional recurrences otherwise remain largely undetected until an advanced cancer presentation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study examined patients presenting with de novo stage IV breast cancer to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York, from 2006 to 2018. Medical records were reviewed to ascertain clinicopathological parameters, including estrogen receptor status and survival. Pretreatment positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging was reviewed to ascertain the extent of regional nodal involvement at metastatic diagnosis using standard nodal assessment criteria. A subset underwent regional lymph node biopsy for diagnostic confirmation and served to validate the radiographic nodal assessment. Data analysis was performed from October 2019 to February 2020. EXPOSURES: Untreated metastatic breast cancer. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the likelihood of regional nodal involvement at the time of metastatic breast cancer presentation and was determined by reviewing pretreatment PET-CT imaging and lymph node biopsy findings. RESULTS: Among 597 women (median [interquartile range] age, 53 [44–65] years) with untreated metastatic breast cancer, 512 (85.8%) exhibited regional lymph node involvement by PET-CT or nodal biopsy, 509 (85%) had involvement of axillary level I, 328 (55%) had involvement in axillary level II, 136 (23%) had involvement in axillary level III, 101 (17%) had involvement in the supraclavicular fossa, and 96 (16%) had involvement in the internal mammary chain. Lymph node involvement was more prevalent among estrogen receptor–negative tumors (92.4%) than estrogen receptor–positive tumors (83.6%). Nodal involvement at the time of metastatic diagnosis was not associated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that a majority of patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer harbor regional lymph node disease at presentation, consistent with the hypothesis that regional involvement may precede metastatic dissemination. This is in alignment with the findings of landmark trials suggesting that RNI reduces distant recurrences. It is possible that this distant effect of RNI may act via eradication of occult regional disease prior to systemic seeding. The challenges inherent in detecting isolated nodal disease (which is typically asymptomatic) may account for the more modest observed benefit of RNI on regional recurrences. Alternative explanations of nodal involvement that arises concurrently or after metastatic dissemination remain possible, but do not otherwise explain the association of RNI with distant recurrence. American Medical Association 2020-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7547365/ /pubmed/33034638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18790 Text en Copyright 2020 Bitencourt A et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Bitencourt, Almir
Rossi Saccarelli, Carolina
Morris, Elizabeth A.
Flynn, Jessica
Zhang, Zhigang
Khan, Atif
Gillespie, Erin
Cahlon, Oren
Mueller, Boris
Cuaron, John J.
McCormick, Beryl
Powell, Simon N.
Plitas, George
Razavi, Pedram
Pinker, Katja
Riedl, Christopher C.
Sutton, Elizabeth J.
Braunstein, Lior Z.
Regional Lymph Node Involvement Among Patients With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer
title Regional Lymph Node Involvement Among Patients With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer
title_full Regional Lymph Node Involvement Among Patients With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Regional Lymph Node Involvement Among Patients With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Regional Lymph Node Involvement Among Patients With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer
title_short Regional Lymph Node Involvement Among Patients With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer
title_sort regional lymph node involvement among patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33034638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18790
work_keys_str_mv AT bitencourtalmir regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT rossisaccarellicarolina regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT morriselizabetha regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT flynnjessica regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT zhangzhigang regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT khanatif regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT gillespieerin regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT cahlonoren regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT muellerboris regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT cuaronjohnj regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT mccormickberyl regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT powellsimonn regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT plitasgeorge regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT razavipedram regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT pinkerkatja regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT riedlchristopherc regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT suttonelizabethj regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer
AT braunsteinliorz regionallymphnodeinvolvementamongpatientswithdenovometastaticbreastcancer