Cargando…
Web-Based Technology for Remote Viewing of Radiological Images: App Validation
BACKGROUND: Internet technologies can create advanced and rich web-based apps that allow radiologists to easily access teleradiology systems and remotely view medical images. However, each technology has its own drawbacks. It is difficult to balance the advantages and disadvantages of these internet...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32975520 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16224 |
_version_ | 1783592412132671488 |
---|---|
author | Min, Qiusha Wang, Xin Huang, Bo Xu, Liangzhou |
author_facet | Min, Qiusha Wang, Xin Huang, Bo Xu, Liangzhou |
author_sort | Min, Qiusha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Internet technologies can create advanced and rich web-based apps that allow radiologists to easily access teleradiology systems and remotely view medical images. However, each technology has its own drawbacks. It is difficult to balance the advantages and disadvantages of these internet technologies and identify an optimal solution for the development of medical imaging apps. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare different internet platform technologies for remotely viewing radiological images and analyze their advantages and disadvantages. METHODS: Oracle Java, Adobe Flash, and HTML5 were each used to develop a comprehensive web-based medical imaging app that connected to a medical image server and provided several required functions for radiological interpretation (eg, navigation, magnification, windowing, and fly-through). Java-, Flash-, and HTML5-based medical imaging apps were tested on different operating systems over a local area network and a wide area network. Three computed tomography colonography data sets and 2 ordinary personal computers were used in the experiment. RESULTS: The experimental results demonstrated that Java-, Flash-, and HTML5-based apps had the ability to provide real-time 2D functions. However, for 3D, performances differed between the 3 apps. The Java-based app had the highest frame rate of volume rendering. However, it required the longest time for surface rendering and failed to run surface rendering in macOS. The HTML5-based app had the fastest surface rendering and the highest speed for fly-through without platform dependence. Volume rendering, surface rendering, and fly-through performances of the Flash-based app were significantly worse than those of the other 2 apps. CONCLUSIONS: Oracle Java, Adobe Flash, and HTML5 have individual strengths in the development of remote access medical imaging apps. However, HTML5 is a promising technology for remote viewing of radiological images and can provide excellent performance without requiring any plug-ins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7547396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75473962020-10-22 Web-Based Technology for Remote Viewing of Radiological Images: App Validation Min, Qiusha Wang, Xin Huang, Bo Xu, Liangzhou J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Internet technologies can create advanced and rich web-based apps that allow radiologists to easily access teleradiology systems and remotely view medical images. However, each technology has its own drawbacks. It is difficult to balance the advantages and disadvantages of these internet technologies and identify an optimal solution for the development of medical imaging apps. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare different internet platform technologies for remotely viewing radiological images and analyze their advantages and disadvantages. METHODS: Oracle Java, Adobe Flash, and HTML5 were each used to develop a comprehensive web-based medical imaging app that connected to a medical image server and provided several required functions for radiological interpretation (eg, navigation, magnification, windowing, and fly-through). Java-, Flash-, and HTML5-based medical imaging apps were tested on different operating systems over a local area network and a wide area network. Three computed tomography colonography data sets and 2 ordinary personal computers were used in the experiment. RESULTS: The experimental results demonstrated that Java-, Flash-, and HTML5-based apps had the ability to provide real-time 2D functions. However, for 3D, performances differed between the 3 apps. The Java-based app had the highest frame rate of volume rendering. However, it required the longest time for surface rendering and failed to run surface rendering in macOS. The HTML5-based app had the fastest surface rendering and the highest speed for fly-through without platform dependence. Volume rendering, surface rendering, and fly-through performances of the Flash-based app were significantly worse than those of the other 2 apps. CONCLUSIONS: Oracle Java, Adobe Flash, and HTML5 have individual strengths in the development of remote access medical imaging apps. However, HTML5 is a promising technology for remote viewing of radiological images and can provide excellent performance without requiring any plug-ins. JMIR Publications 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7547396/ /pubmed/32975520 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16224 Text en ©Qiusha Min, Xin Wang, Bo Huang, Liangzhou Xu. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 25.09.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Min, Qiusha Wang, Xin Huang, Bo Xu, Liangzhou Web-Based Technology for Remote Viewing of Radiological Images: App Validation |
title | Web-Based Technology for Remote Viewing of Radiological Images: App Validation |
title_full | Web-Based Technology for Remote Viewing of Radiological Images: App Validation |
title_fullStr | Web-Based Technology for Remote Viewing of Radiological Images: App Validation |
title_full_unstemmed | Web-Based Technology for Remote Viewing of Radiological Images: App Validation |
title_short | Web-Based Technology for Remote Viewing of Radiological Images: App Validation |
title_sort | web-based technology for remote viewing of radiological images: app validation |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32975520 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minqiusha webbasedtechnologyforremoteviewingofradiologicalimagesappvalidation AT wangxin webbasedtechnologyforremoteviewingofradiologicalimagesappvalidation AT huangbo webbasedtechnologyforremoteviewingofradiologicalimagesappvalidation AT xuliangzhou webbasedtechnologyforremoteviewingofradiologicalimagesappvalidation |