Cargando…

Biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND: There are several types of tenodesis reconstruction designed for subtalar instability. However, no comprehensive comparison has been conducted among these procedures in terms of their correcting power so far. The objective of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical behaviors of 5 rep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Can, Xu, Mingqing, Li, Chenggong, Wang, Hua, Liu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33036597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03693-5
_version_ 1783592417351434240
author Can, Xu
Mingqing, Li
Chenggong, Wang
Hua, Liu
author_facet Can, Xu
Mingqing, Li
Chenggong, Wang
Hua, Liu
author_sort Can, Xu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are several types of tenodesis reconstruction designed for subtalar instability. However, no comprehensive comparison has been conducted among these procedures in terms of their correcting power so far. The objective of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical behaviors of 5 representative procedures through finite element analysis. METHODS: Finite element models were established and validated based on one of our previous studies. The Pisani interosseous talocalcaneal ligament (ITCL) reconstruction, Schon cervical ligament (CL) reconstruction and Choisne calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) reconstruction were compared on the model with the CFL, ITCL and CL sectioned. The Schon triligamentous reconstruction and Mann triligamentous reconstruction were compared on the model with the CFL, ITCL and CL, as well as the ATFL sectioned. The inversion and external/internal rotation were quantified at different ankle positions based on the rotational moment. Then, the stress in ligaments and reconstructed grafts and the contact characteristics of the subtalar joint under inversional stress test were calculated and compared accordingly. RESULTS: For single ligament reconstruction, the Choisne CFL reconstruction provided the greatest degree of correction for subtalar instability, followed by the Schon CL reconstruction and then the Pisani ITCL reconstruction. For triligamentous reconstruction, the Mann procedure outperformed the Schon procedure in alleviating the subtalar instability. CONCLUSION: The finite element analysis showed that the Choisne CFL reconstruction and Mann triligamentous reconstruction provided the greatest degree of immediate postoperative subtalar stability. However, both procedures could not restore the biomechanical behaviors of the subtalar joint to normal. The long-term efficacy of these procedures warrants further investigation using a substantially larger sample of clinical cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7547424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75474242020-10-13 Biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis Can, Xu Mingqing, Li Chenggong, Wang Hua, Liu BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: There are several types of tenodesis reconstruction designed for subtalar instability. However, no comprehensive comparison has been conducted among these procedures in terms of their correcting power so far. The objective of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical behaviors of 5 representative procedures through finite element analysis. METHODS: Finite element models were established and validated based on one of our previous studies. The Pisani interosseous talocalcaneal ligament (ITCL) reconstruction, Schon cervical ligament (CL) reconstruction and Choisne calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) reconstruction were compared on the model with the CFL, ITCL and CL sectioned. The Schon triligamentous reconstruction and Mann triligamentous reconstruction were compared on the model with the CFL, ITCL and CL, as well as the ATFL sectioned. The inversion and external/internal rotation were quantified at different ankle positions based on the rotational moment. Then, the stress in ligaments and reconstructed grafts and the contact characteristics of the subtalar joint under inversional stress test were calculated and compared accordingly. RESULTS: For single ligament reconstruction, the Choisne CFL reconstruction provided the greatest degree of correction for subtalar instability, followed by the Schon CL reconstruction and then the Pisani ITCL reconstruction. For triligamentous reconstruction, the Mann procedure outperformed the Schon procedure in alleviating the subtalar instability. CONCLUSION: The finite element analysis showed that the Choisne CFL reconstruction and Mann triligamentous reconstruction provided the greatest degree of immediate postoperative subtalar stability. However, both procedures could not restore the biomechanical behaviors of the subtalar joint to normal. The long-term efficacy of these procedures warrants further investigation using a substantially larger sample of clinical cases. BioMed Central 2020-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7547424/ /pubmed/33036597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03693-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Can, Xu
Mingqing, Li
Chenggong, Wang
Hua, Liu
Biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis
title Biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis
title_full Biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis
title_short Biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis
title_sort biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33036597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03693-5
work_keys_str_mv AT canxu biomechanicalcomparisonoftenodesisreconstructionforsubtalarinstabilityafiniteelementanalysis
AT mingqingli biomechanicalcomparisonoftenodesisreconstructionforsubtalarinstabilityafiniteelementanalysis
AT chenggongwang biomechanicalcomparisonoftenodesisreconstructionforsubtalarinstabilityafiniteelementanalysis
AT hualiu biomechanicalcomparisonoftenodesisreconstructionforsubtalarinstabilityafiniteelementanalysis