Cargando…
Comparison of the relative muscle volume of triceps surae among sprinters, runners, and untrained participants
Muscle hypertrophy is considered more prominent in fast‐twitch than in slow‐twitch muscles. This leads to the hypothesis that the relative muscle volume of the medial gastrocnemius (MG) and lateral gastrocnemius (LG) becomes larger than that of the soleus (SOL) in highly trained participants because...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33038068 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14588 |
_version_ | 1783592451444834304 |
---|---|
author | Fukutani, Atsuki Tsuruhara, Yume Miyake, Yuto Takao, Kenji Ueno, Hiromasa Otsuka, Mitsuo Suga, Tadashi Terada, Masafumi Nagano, Akinori Isaka, Tadao |
author_facet | Fukutani, Atsuki Tsuruhara, Yume Miyake, Yuto Takao, Kenji Ueno, Hiromasa Otsuka, Mitsuo Suga, Tadashi Terada, Masafumi Nagano, Akinori Isaka, Tadao |
author_sort | Fukutani, Atsuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Muscle hypertrophy is considered more prominent in fast‐twitch than in slow‐twitch muscles. This leads to the hypothesis that the relative muscle volume of the medial gastrocnemius (MG) and lateral gastrocnemius (LG) becomes larger than that of the soleus (SOL) in highly trained participants because MG and LG include more fast‐twitch muscles than SOL. Thus, we compared relative muscle volume among highly trained sprinters, long‐distance runners, and untrained participants to examine whether the above hypothesis is correct. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to calculate the muscle volume of MG, LG, and SOL from 126 participants. The total muscle volume of the three muscles and the relative muscle volume of each muscle with respect to the total muscle volume were calculated. The total muscle volume was significantly larger in the sprinters than in the long‐distance runners and untrained participants. The relative muscle volume of MG was significantly larger in the sprinters than in the long‐distance runners and untrained participants and that of SOL was significantly smaller in the sprinters than in the long‐distance runners and untrained participants. These results indicate that the relative muscle volume can vary among participants, possibly due to fiber type‐dependent muscle hypertrophy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7547585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75475852020-10-16 Comparison of the relative muscle volume of triceps surae among sprinters, runners, and untrained participants Fukutani, Atsuki Tsuruhara, Yume Miyake, Yuto Takao, Kenji Ueno, Hiromasa Otsuka, Mitsuo Suga, Tadashi Terada, Masafumi Nagano, Akinori Isaka, Tadao Physiol Rep Original Research Muscle hypertrophy is considered more prominent in fast‐twitch than in slow‐twitch muscles. This leads to the hypothesis that the relative muscle volume of the medial gastrocnemius (MG) and lateral gastrocnemius (LG) becomes larger than that of the soleus (SOL) in highly trained participants because MG and LG include more fast‐twitch muscles than SOL. Thus, we compared relative muscle volume among highly trained sprinters, long‐distance runners, and untrained participants to examine whether the above hypothesis is correct. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to calculate the muscle volume of MG, LG, and SOL from 126 participants. The total muscle volume of the three muscles and the relative muscle volume of each muscle with respect to the total muscle volume were calculated. The total muscle volume was significantly larger in the sprinters than in the long‐distance runners and untrained participants. The relative muscle volume of MG was significantly larger in the sprinters than in the long‐distance runners and untrained participants and that of SOL was significantly smaller in the sprinters than in the long‐distance runners and untrained participants. These results indicate that the relative muscle volume can vary among participants, possibly due to fiber type‐dependent muscle hypertrophy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7547585/ /pubmed/33038068 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14588 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Fukutani, Atsuki Tsuruhara, Yume Miyake, Yuto Takao, Kenji Ueno, Hiromasa Otsuka, Mitsuo Suga, Tadashi Terada, Masafumi Nagano, Akinori Isaka, Tadao Comparison of the relative muscle volume of triceps surae among sprinters, runners, and untrained participants |
title | Comparison of the relative muscle volume of triceps surae among sprinters, runners, and untrained participants |
title_full | Comparison of the relative muscle volume of triceps surae among sprinters, runners, and untrained participants |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the relative muscle volume of triceps surae among sprinters, runners, and untrained participants |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the relative muscle volume of triceps surae among sprinters, runners, and untrained participants |
title_short | Comparison of the relative muscle volume of triceps surae among sprinters, runners, and untrained participants |
title_sort | comparison of the relative muscle volume of triceps surae among sprinters, runners, and untrained participants |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33038068 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14588 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fukutaniatsuki comparisonoftherelativemusclevolumeoftricepssuraeamongsprintersrunnersanduntrainedparticipants AT tsuruharayume comparisonoftherelativemusclevolumeoftricepssuraeamongsprintersrunnersanduntrainedparticipants AT miyakeyuto comparisonoftherelativemusclevolumeoftricepssuraeamongsprintersrunnersanduntrainedparticipants AT takaokenji comparisonoftherelativemusclevolumeoftricepssuraeamongsprintersrunnersanduntrainedparticipants AT uenohiromasa comparisonoftherelativemusclevolumeoftricepssuraeamongsprintersrunnersanduntrainedparticipants AT otsukamitsuo comparisonoftherelativemusclevolumeoftricepssuraeamongsprintersrunnersanduntrainedparticipants AT sugatadashi comparisonoftherelativemusclevolumeoftricepssuraeamongsprintersrunnersanduntrainedparticipants AT teradamasafumi comparisonoftherelativemusclevolumeoftricepssuraeamongsprintersrunnersanduntrainedparticipants AT naganoakinori comparisonoftherelativemusclevolumeoftricepssuraeamongsprintersrunnersanduntrainedparticipants AT isakatadao comparisonoftherelativemusclevolumeoftricepssuraeamongsprintersrunnersanduntrainedparticipants |