Cargando…
Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa
Lower respiratory tract infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality. The global increase in antimicrobial resistance necessitates rapid diagnostic assays. The BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus (FAPP) panel is a Food and Drug Administration-approved multiplex polymerase chain reaction a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33130507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115236 |
_version_ | 1783592457770893312 |
---|---|
author | Mitton, Barend Rule, Roxanne Said, Mohamed |
author_facet | Mitton, Barend Rule, Roxanne Said, Mohamed |
author_sort | Mitton, Barend |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lower respiratory tract infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality. The global increase in antimicrobial resistance necessitates rapid diagnostic assays. The BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus (FAPP) panel is a Food and Drug Administration-approved multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay that detects the most important etiological agents of pneumonia and associated antibiotic resistance genes, in approximately 1 hour. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of this assay by comparing it to conventional culture methods in the analysis of 59 lower respiratory tract specimens. The sensitivity and specificity of the FAPP panel for bacterial detection were 92.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.8% to 97.8%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 91.1% to 95.3%) respectively. For detecting antibiotic resistance, the positive- and negative percent agreement were 100% (95% CI, 81.5% to 100.0%) and 98.5% (95% CI, 216 96.7% to 99.4%) respectively. The FAPP panel was found to be highly accurate in evaluating tracheal aspirate specimens from hospitalized patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7547612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75476122020-10-13 Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa Mitton, Barend Rule, Roxanne Said, Mohamed Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Article Lower respiratory tract infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality. The global increase in antimicrobial resistance necessitates rapid diagnostic assays. The BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus (FAPP) panel is a Food and Drug Administration-approved multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay that detects the most important etiological agents of pneumonia and associated antibiotic resistance genes, in approximately 1 hour. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of this assay by comparing it to conventional culture methods in the analysis of 59 lower respiratory tract specimens. The sensitivity and specificity of the FAPP panel for bacterial detection were 92.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.8% to 97.8%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 91.1% to 95.3%) respectively. For detecting antibiotic resistance, the positive- and negative percent agreement were 100% (95% CI, 81.5% to 100.0%) and 98.5% (95% CI, 216 96.7% to 99.4%) respectively. The FAPP panel was found to be highly accurate in evaluating tracheal aspirate specimens from hospitalized patients. Elsevier Inc. 2021-02 2020-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7547612/ /pubmed/33130507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115236 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Mitton, Barend Rule, Roxanne Said, Mohamed Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa |
title | Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa |
title_full | Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa |
title_fullStr | Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa |
title_short | Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa |
title_sort | laboratory evaluation of the biofire filmarray pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from south africa |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33130507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115236 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mittonbarend laboratoryevaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanelcomparedtoconventionalmethodsfortheidentificationofbacteriainlowerrespiratorytractspecimensaprospectivecrosssectionalstudyfromsouthafrica AT ruleroxanne laboratoryevaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanelcomparedtoconventionalmethodsfortheidentificationofbacteriainlowerrespiratorytractspecimensaprospectivecrosssectionalstudyfromsouthafrica AT saidmohamed laboratoryevaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanelcomparedtoconventionalmethodsfortheidentificationofbacteriainlowerrespiratorytractspecimensaprospectivecrosssectionalstudyfromsouthafrica |