Cargando…

Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa

Lower respiratory tract infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality. The global increase in antimicrobial resistance necessitates rapid diagnostic assays. The BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus (FAPP) panel is a Food and Drug Administration-approved multiplex polymerase chain reaction a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitton, Barend, Rule, Roxanne, Said, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33130507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115236
_version_ 1783592457770893312
author Mitton, Barend
Rule, Roxanne
Said, Mohamed
author_facet Mitton, Barend
Rule, Roxanne
Said, Mohamed
author_sort Mitton, Barend
collection PubMed
description Lower respiratory tract infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality. The global increase in antimicrobial resistance necessitates rapid diagnostic assays. The BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus (FAPP) panel is a Food and Drug Administration-approved multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay that detects the most important etiological agents of pneumonia and associated antibiotic resistance genes, in approximately 1 hour. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of this assay by comparing it to conventional culture methods in the analysis of 59 lower respiratory tract specimens. The sensitivity and specificity of the FAPP panel for bacterial detection were 92.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.8% to 97.8%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 91.1% to 95.3%) respectively. For detecting antibiotic resistance, the positive- and negative percent agreement were 100% (95% CI, 81.5% to 100.0%) and 98.5% (95% CI, 216 96.7% to 99.4%) respectively. The FAPP panel was found to be highly accurate in evaluating tracheal aspirate specimens from hospitalized patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7547612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75476122020-10-13 Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa Mitton, Barend Rule, Roxanne Said, Mohamed Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Article Lower respiratory tract infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality. The global increase in antimicrobial resistance necessitates rapid diagnostic assays. The BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus (FAPP) panel is a Food and Drug Administration-approved multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay that detects the most important etiological agents of pneumonia and associated antibiotic resistance genes, in approximately 1 hour. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of this assay by comparing it to conventional culture methods in the analysis of 59 lower respiratory tract specimens. The sensitivity and specificity of the FAPP panel for bacterial detection were 92.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.8% to 97.8%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 91.1% to 95.3%) respectively. For detecting antibiotic resistance, the positive- and negative percent agreement were 100% (95% CI, 81.5% to 100.0%) and 98.5% (95% CI, 216 96.7% to 99.4%) respectively. The FAPP panel was found to be highly accurate in evaluating tracheal aspirate specimens from hospitalized patients. Elsevier Inc. 2021-02 2020-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7547612/ /pubmed/33130507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115236 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Mitton, Barend
Rule, Roxanne
Said, Mohamed
Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa
title Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa
title_full Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa
title_fullStr Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa
title_short Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa
title_sort laboratory evaluation of the biofire filmarray pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens: a prospective cross-sectional study from south africa
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33130507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115236
work_keys_str_mv AT mittonbarend laboratoryevaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanelcomparedtoconventionalmethodsfortheidentificationofbacteriainlowerrespiratorytractspecimensaprospectivecrosssectionalstudyfromsouthafrica
AT ruleroxanne laboratoryevaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanelcomparedtoconventionalmethodsfortheidentificationofbacteriainlowerrespiratorytractspecimensaprospectivecrosssectionalstudyfromsouthafrica
AT saidmohamed laboratoryevaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanelcomparedtoconventionalmethodsfortheidentificationofbacteriainlowerrespiratorytractspecimensaprospectivecrosssectionalstudyfromsouthafrica