Cargando…
Impact of Time to Receipt of Prosthesis on Total Healthcare Costs 12 Months Postamputation
The objective was to assess the impact of a prosthesis and the timing of prosthesis receipt on total direct healthcare costs in the 12-mo postamputation period. DESIGN: Data on patients with lower limb amputation (n = 510) were obtained from a commercial claims database for retrospective cohort anal...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33060371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001473 |
_version_ | 1783592511905726464 |
---|---|
author | Miller, Taavy A. Paul, Rajib Forthofer, Melinda Wurdeman, Shane R. |
author_facet | Miller, Taavy A. Paul, Rajib Forthofer, Melinda Wurdeman, Shane R. |
author_sort | Miller, Taavy A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective was to assess the impact of a prosthesis and the timing of prosthesis receipt on total direct healthcare costs in the 12-mo postamputation period. DESIGN: Data on patients with lower limb amputation (n = 510) were obtained from a commercial claims database for retrospective cohort analysis. Generalized linear multivariate modeling was used to determine differences in cost between groups according to timing of prosthesis receipt compared with a control group with no prosthesis. RESULTS: Receipt of a prosthesis between 0 and 3 mos post lower limb amputation yielded a reduced total cost by approximately 0.23 in log scale within 12 mos after amputation when compared with the no-prosthesis group. Despite the included costs of a prosthesis, individuals who received a prosthesis either at 4–6 mos postamputation or 7–9 mos postamputation incurred costs similar to the no-prosthesis group. CONCLUSION: Earlier receipt of a prosthesis is associated with reduced spending in the 12 mos postamputation of approximately $25,000 compared with not receiving a prosthesis. The results of this study suggest that not providing or delaying the provision of a prosthesis increases costs by about 25%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7547875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75478752020-10-29 Impact of Time to Receipt of Prosthesis on Total Healthcare Costs 12 Months Postamputation Miller, Taavy A. Paul, Rajib Forthofer, Melinda Wurdeman, Shane R. Am J Phys Med Rehabil Original Research Articles The objective was to assess the impact of a prosthesis and the timing of prosthesis receipt on total direct healthcare costs in the 12-mo postamputation period. DESIGN: Data on patients with lower limb amputation (n = 510) were obtained from a commercial claims database for retrospective cohort analysis. Generalized linear multivariate modeling was used to determine differences in cost between groups according to timing of prosthesis receipt compared with a control group with no prosthesis. RESULTS: Receipt of a prosthesis between 0 and 3 mos post lower limb amputation yielded a reduced total cost by approximately 0.23 in log scale within 12 mos after amputation when compared with the no-prosthesis group. Despite the included costs of a prosthesis, individuals who received a prosthesis either at 4–6 mos postamputation or 7–9 mos postamputation incurred costs similar to the no-prosthesis group. CONCLUSION: Earlier receipt of a prosthesis is associated with reduced spending in the 12 mos postamputation of approximately $25,000 compared with not receiving a prosthesis. The results of this study suggest that not providing or delaying the provision of a prosthesis increases costs by about 25%. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11 2020-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7547875/ /pubmed/33060371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001473 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Miller, Taavy A. Paul, Rajib Forthofer, Melinda Wurdeman, Shane R. Impact of Time to Receipt of Prosthesis on Total Healthcare Costs 12 Months Postamputation |
title | Impact of Time to Receipt of Prosthesis on Total Healthcare Costs 12 Months Postamputation |
title_full | Impact of Time to Receipt of Prosthesis on Total Healthcare Costs 12 Months Postamputation |
title_fullStr | Impact of Time to Receipt of Prosthesis on Total Healthcare Costs 12 Months Postamputation |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Time to Receipt of Prosthesis on Total Healthcare Costs 12 Months Postamputation |
title_short | Impact of Time to Receipt of Prosthesis on Total Healthcare Costs 12 Months Postamputation |
title_sort | impact of time to receipt of prosthesis on total healthcare costs 12 months postamputation |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33060371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001473 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millertaavya impactoftimetoreceiptofprosthesisontotalhealthcarecosts12monthspostamputation AT paulrajib impactoftimetoreceiptofprosthesisontotalhealthcarecosts12monthspostamputation AT forthofermelinda impactoftimetoreceiptofprosthesisontotalhealthcarecosts12monthspostamputation AT wurdemanshaner impactoftimetoreceiptofprosthesisontotalhealthcarecosts12monthspostamputation |