Cargando…

Detection of vertebral fracture in an acute hospital setting: an intervention to reduce future fracture risk through fracture liaison service intervention?

SUMMARY: We introduced a standardised reporting system in the radiology department to highlight vertebral fractures and to signpost fracture prevention services. Our quality improvement project achieved improved fracture reporting, access to the FLS service, bone density assessment and anti-fracture...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toal, Michael, McLoughlin, Connor, Pierce, Nicole, Moss, Julie, English, Sarah, Lindsay, John R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33040188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00832-2
_version_ 1783592525735395328
author Toal, Michael
McLoughlin, Connor
Pierce, Nicole
Moss, Julie
English, Sarah
Lindsay, John R
author_facet Toal, Michael
McLoughlin, Connor
Pierce, Nicole
Moss, Julie
English, Sarah
Lindsay, John R
author_sort Toal, Michael
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: We introduced a standardised reporting system in the radiology department to highlight vertebral fractures and to signpost fracture prevention services. Our quality improvement project achieved improved fracture reporting, access to the FLS service, bone density assessment and anti-fracture treatment. PURPOSE: Identification of vertebral fragility fractures (VF) provides an opportunity to identify individuals at high risk who might benefit from secondary fracture prevention. We sought to standardise VF reporting and to signpost fracture prevention services. Our aim was to improve rates of VF detection and access to our fracture liaison service (FLS). METHODS: We introduced a standardised reporting tool within the radiology department to flag VFs with signposting for referral for bone densitometry (DXA) and osteoporosis assessment in line with Royal Osteoporosis Society guidelines. We monitored uptake of VF reporting during a quality improvement phase and case identification within the FLS service. RESULTS: Recruitment of individuals with VF to the FLS service increased from a baseline of 63 cases in 2017 (6%) to 95 (8%) in 2018 and 157 (8%) in 2019 and to 102 (12%) in the first 6 months of 2020 (p = 0.001). One hundred fifty-three patients with VFs were identified during the QI period (56 males; 97 females). Use of the terminology ‘fracture’ increased to 100% (mean age 70 years; SD 13) in computed tomography (n = 110), plain X-ray (n = 37) or magnetic resonance imaging (n = 6) reports within the cohort. Signposting to DXA and osteoporosis assessment was included in all reports (100%). DXA was arranged for 103/153; 12 failed to attend. Diagnostic categories were osteoporosis (31%), osteopenia (36%) or normal bone density (33%). A new prescription for bone protection therapy was issued in 63/153. Twelve of the series died during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Standardisation of radiology reporting systems facilitates reporting of prevalent vertebral fractures and supports secondary fracture prevention strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7547950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75479502020-10-19 Detection of vertebral fracture in an acute hospital setting: an intervention to reduce future fracture risk through fracture liaison service intervention? Toal, Michael McLoughlin, Connor Pierce, Nicole Moss, Julie English, Sarah Lindsay, John R Arch Osteoporos Original Article SUMMARY: We introduced a standardised reporting system in the radiology department to highlight vertebral fractures and to signpost fracture prevention services. Our quality improvement project achieved improved fracture reporting, access to the FLS service, bone density assessment and anti-fracture treatment. PURPOSE: Identification of vertebral fragility fractures (VF) provides an opportunity to identify individuals at high risk who might benefit from secondary fracture prevention. We sought to standardise VF reporting and to signpost fracture prevention services. Our aim was to improve rates of VF detection and access to our fracture liaison service (FLS). METHODS: We introduced a standardised reporting tool within the radiology department to flag VFs with signposting for referral for bone densitometry (DXA) and osteoporosis assessment in line with Royal Osteoporosis Society guidelines. We monitored uptake of VF reporting during a quality improvement phase and case identification within the FLS service. RESULTS: Recruitment of individuals with VF to the FLS service increased from a baseline of 63 cases in 2017 (6%) to 95 (8%) in 2018 and 157 (8%) in 2019 and to 102 (12%) in the first 6 months of 2020 (p = 0.001). One hundred fifty-three patients with VFs were identified during the QI period (56 males; 97 females). Use of the terminology ‘fracture’ increased to 100% (mean age 70 years; SD 13) in computed tomography (n = 110), plain X-ray (n = 37) or magnetic resonance imaging (n = 6) reports within the cohort. Signposting to DXA and osteoporosis assessment was included in all reports (100%). DXA was arranged for 103/153; 12 failed to attend. Diagnostic categories were osteoporosis (31%), osteopenia (36%) or normal bone density (33%). A new prescription for bone protection therapy was issued in 63/153. Twelve of the series died during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Standardisation of radiology reporting systems facilitates reporting of prevalent vertebral fractures and supports secondary fracture prevention strategies. Springer London 2020-10-10 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7547950/ /pubmed/33040188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00832-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Toal, Michael
McLoughlin, Connor
Pierce, Nicole
Moss, Julie
English, Sarah
Lindsay, John R
Detection of vertebral fracture in an acute hospital setting: an intervention to reduce future fracture risk through fracture liaison service intervention?
title Detection of vertebral fracture in an acute hospital setting: an intervention to reduce future fracture risk through fracture liaison service intervention?
title_full Detection of vertebral fracture in an acute hospital setting: an intervention to reduce future fracture risk through fracture liaison service intervention?
title_fullStr Detection of vertebral fracture in an acute hospital setting: an intervention to reduce future fracture risk through fracture liaison service intervention?
title_full_unstemmed Detection of vertebral fracture in an acute hospital setting: an intervention to reduce future fracture risk through fracture liaison service intervention?
title_short Detection of vertebral fracture in an acute hospital setting: an intervention to reduce future fracture risk through fracture liaison service intervention?
title_sort detection of vertebral fracture in an acute hospital setting: an intervention to reduce future fracture risk through fracture liaison service intervention?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33040188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00832-2
work_keys_str_mv AT toalmichael detectionofvertebralfractureinanacutehospitalsettinganinterventiontoreducefuturefractureriskthroughfractureliaisonserviceintervention
AT mcloughlinconnor detectionofvertebralfractureinanacutehospitalsettinganinterventiontoreducefuturefractureriskthroughfractureliaisonserviceintervention
AT piercenicole detectionofvertebralfractureinanacutehospitalsettinganinterventiontoreducefuturefractureriskthroughfractureliaisonserviceintervention
AT mossjulie detectionofvertebralfractureinanacutehospitalsettinganinterventiontoreducefuturefractureriskthroughfractureliaisonserviceintervention
AT englishsarah detectionofvertebralfractureinanacutehospitalsettinganinterventiontoreducefuturefractureriskthroughfractureliaisonserviceintervention
AT lindsayjohnr detectionofvertebralfractureinanacutehospitalsettinganinterventiontoreducefuturefractureriskthroughfractureliaisonserviceintervention