Cargando…
Genome-based trait prediction in multi- environment breeding trials in groundnut
KEY MESSAGE: Comparative assessment identified naïve interaction model, and naïve and informed interaction GS models suitable for achieving higher prediction accuracy in groundnut keeping in mind the high genotype × environment interaction for complex traits. ABSTRACT: Genomic selection (GS) can be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32809035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-020-03658-1 |
_version_ | 1783592530627002368 |
---|---|
author | Pandey, Manish K. Chaudhari, Sunil Jarquin, Diego Janila, Pasupuleti Crossa, Jose Patil, Sudam C. Sundravadana, Subramaniam Khare, Dhirendra Bhat, Ramesh S. Radhakrishnan, Thankappan Hickey, John M. Varshney, Rajeev K. |
author_facet | Pandey, Manish K. Chaudhari, Sunil Jarquin, Diego Janila, Pasupuleti Crossa, Jose Patil, Sudam C. Sundravadana, Subramaniam Khare, Dhirendra Bhat, Ramesh S. Radhakrishnan, Thankappan Hickey, John M. Varshney, Rajeev K. |
author_sort | Pandey, Manish K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | KEY MESSAGE: Comparative assessment identified naïve interaction model, and naïve and informed interaction GS models suitable for achieving higher prediction accuracy in groundnut keeping in mind the high genotype × environment interaction for complex traits. ABSTRACT: Genomic selection (GS) can be an efficient and cost-effective breeding approach which captures both small- and large-effect genetic factors and therefore promises to achieve higher genetic gains for complex traits such as yield and oil content in groundnut. A training population was constituted with 340 elite lines followed by genotyping with 58 K ‘Axiom_Arachis’ SNP array and phenotyping for key agronomic traits at three locations in India. Four GS models were tested using three different random cross-validation schemes (CV0, CV1 and CV2). These models are: (1) model 1 (M1 = E + L) which includes the main effects of environment (E) and line (L); (2) model 2 (M2 = E + L + G) which includes the main effects of markers (G) in addition to E and L; (3) model 3 (M3 = E + L + G + GE), a naïve interaction model; and (4) model 4 (E + L + G + LE + GE), a naïve and informed interaction model. Prediction accuracy estimated for four models indicated clear advantage of the inclusion of marker information which was reflected in better prediction accuracy achieved with models M2, M3 and M4 as compared to M1 model. High prediction accuracies (> 0.600) were observed for days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, hundred seed weight, oleic acid, rust@90 days, rust@105 days and late leaf spot@90 days, while medium prediction accuracies (0.400–0.600) were obtained for pods/plant, shelling %, and total yield/plant. Assessment of comparative prediction accuracy for different GS models to perform selection for untested genotypes, and unobserved and unevaluated environments provided greater insights on potential application of GS breeding in groundnut. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00122-020-03658-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7547976 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75479762020-10-19 Genome-based trait prediction in multi- environment breeding trials in groundnut Pandey, Manish K. Chaudhari, Sunil Jarquin, Diego Janila, Pasupuleti Crossa, Jose Patil, Sudam C. Sundravadana, Subramaniam Khare, Dhirendra Bhat, Ramesh S. Radhakrishnan, Thankappan Hickey, John M. Varshney, Rajeev K. Theor Appl Genet Original Article KEY MESSAGE: Comparative assessment identified naïve interaction model, and naïve and informed interaction GS models suitable for achieving higher prediction accuracy in groundnut keeping in mind the high genotype × environment interaction for complex traits. ABSTRACT: Genomic selection (GS) can be an efficient and cost-effective breeding approach which captures both small- and large-effect genetic factors and therefore promises to achieve higher genetic gains for complex traits such as yield and oil content in groundnut. A training population was constituted with 340 elite lines followed by genotyping with 58 K ‘Axiom_Arachis’ SNP array and phenotyping for key agronomic traits at three locations in India. Four GS models were tested using three different random cross-validation schemes (CV0, CV1 and CV2). These models are: (1) model 1 (M1 = E + L) which includes the main effects of environment (E) and line (L); (2) model 2 (M2 = E + L + G) which includes the main effects of markers (G) in addition to E and L; (3) model 3 (M3 = E + L + G + GE), a naïve interaction model; and (4) model 4 (E + L + G + LE + GE), a naïve and informed interaction model. Prediction accuracy estimated for four models indicated clear advantage of the inclusion of marker information which was reflected in better prediction accuracy achieved with models M2, M3 and M4 as compared to M1 model. High prediction accuracies (> 0.600) were observed for days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, hundred seed weight, oleic acid, rust@90 days, rust@105 days and late leaf spot@90 days, while medium prediction accuracies (0.400–0.600) were obtained for pods/plant, shelling %, and total yield/plant. Assessment of comparative prediction accuracy for different GS models to perform selection for untested genotypes, and unobserved and unevaluated environments provided greater insights on potential application of GS breeding in groundnut. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00122-020-03658-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7547976/ /pubmed/32809035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-020-03658-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pandey, Manish K. Chaudhari, Sunil Jarquin, Diego Janila, Pasupuleti Crossa, Jose Patil, Sudam C. Sundravadana, Subramaniam Khare, Dhirendra Bhat, Ramesh S. Radhakrishnan, Thankappan Hickey, John M. Varshney, Rajeev K. Genome-based trait prediction in multi- environment breeding trials in groundnut |
title | Genome-based trait prediction in multi- environment breeding trials in groundnut |
title_full | Genome-based trait prediction in multi- environment breeding trials in groundnut |
title_fullStr | Genome-based trait prediction in multi- environment breeding trials in groundnut |
title_full_unstemmed | Genome-based trait prediction in multi- environment breeding trials in groundnut |
title_short | Genome-based trait prediction in multi- environment breeding trials in groundnut |
title_sort | genome-based trait prediction in multi- environment breeding trials in groundnut |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32809035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-020-03658-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pandeymanishk genomebasedtraitpredictioninmultienvironmentbreedingtrialsingroundnut AT chaudharisunil genomebasedtraitpredictioninmultienvironmentbreedingtrialsingroundnut AT jarquindiego genomebasedtraitpredictioninmultienvironmentbreedingtrialsingroundnut AT janilapasupuleti genomebasedtraitpredictioninmultienvironmentbreedingtrialsingroundnut AT crossajose genomebasedtraitpredictioninmultienvironmentbreedingtrialsingroundnut AT patilsudamc genomebasedtraitpredictioninmultienvironmentbreedingtrialsingroundnut AT sundravadanasubramaniam genomebasedtraitpredictioninmultienvironmentbreedingtrialsingroundnut AT kharedhirendra genomebasedtraitpredictioninmultienvironmentbreedingtrialsingroundnut AT bhatrameshs genomebasedtraitpredictioninmultienvironmentbreedingtrialsingroundnut AT radhakrishnanthankappan genomebasedtraitpredictioninmultienvironmentbreedingtrialsingroundnut AT hickeyjohnm genomebasedtraitpredictioninmultienvironmentbreedingtrialsingroundnut AT varshneyrajeevk genomebasedtraitpredictioninmultienvironmentbreedingtrialsingroundnut |