Cargando…

Neonatal and young infant sepsis by Group B Streptococci and Escherichia coli: a single-center retrospective analysis in Germany—GBS screening implementation gaps and reduction in antibiotic resistance

The last nationwide surveillance study on neonatal and young infant sepsis due to Group B Streptococci (GBS) and Escherichia coli in Germany was conducted between 2009 and 2010. The aim of this study is to provide longitudinal epidemiological data on neonatal and young infant sepsis caused by GBS an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doenhardt, Maren, Seipolt, Barbara, Mense, Lars, Winkler, Jennifer Lucia, Thürmer, Alexander, Rüdiger, Mario, Berner, Reinhard, Armann, Jakob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32447562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03659-8
_version_ 1783592532038385664
author Doenhardt, Maren
Seipolt, Barbara
Mense, Lars
Winkler, Jennifer Lucia
Thürmer, Alexander
Rüdiger, Mario
Berner, Reinhard
Armann, Jakob
author_facet Doenhardt, Maren
Seipolt, Barbara
Mense, Lars
Winkler, Jennifer Lucia
Thürmer, Alexander
Rüdiger, Mario
Berner, Reinhard
Armann, Jakob
author_sort Doenhardt, Maren
collection PubMed
description The last nationwide surveillance study on neonatal and young infant sepsis due to Group B Streptococci (GBS) and Escherichia coli in Germany was conducted between 2009 and 2010. The aim of this study is to provide longitudinal epidemiological data on neonatal and young infant sepsis caused by GBS and E. coli to reevaluate existing data and to inform clinical decision-making. Every positive blood culture for GBS and E. coli within the first 90 days of life that occurred at our center from 2008 until 2018 was identified. The epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and microbiological data of all affected patients were analyzed through retrospective chart review, along with the pathogen’s antimicrobial susceptibility results. In total, 106 episodes of neonatal sepsis were described; 31% (n = 33) being caused by GBS and 69% (n = 73) by E. coli; 87% of GBS early-onset disease (EOD) cases did not receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP). Contrary to general trends, the proportion of resistant E. coli isolates decreased for all tested antibiotics over time. Coincidentally, antenatal antibiotic use beyond IAP during that period decreased significantly in our center. Conclusions: (1) Data at our center suggests at least a regional implementation gap in GBS screening and IAP. (2) The decline in the resistance rate of E. coli for all antimicrobial substances might indicate that the reduction of prenatal antibiotics use is beneficial and that neonatal antibiotic stewardship programs should include pregnant women as well. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00431-020-03659-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7547982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75479822020-10-19 Neonatal and young infant sepsis by Group B Streptococci and Escherichia coli: a single-center retrospective analysis in Germany—GBS screening implementation gaps and reduction in antibiotic resistance Doenhardt, Maren Seipolt, Barbara Mense, Lars Winkler, Jennifer Lucia Thürmer, Alexander Rüdiger, Mario Berner, Reinhard Armann, Jakob Eur J Pediatr Original Article The last nationwide surveillance study on neonatal and young infant sepsis due to Group B Streptococci (GBS) and Escherichia coli in Germany was conducted between 2009 and 2010. The aim of this study is to provide longitudinal epidemiological data on neonatal and young infant sepsis caused by GBS and E. coli to reevaluate existing data and to inform clinical decision-making. Every positive blood culture for GBS and E. coli within the first 90 days of life that occurred at our center from 2008 until 2018 was identified. The epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and microbiological data of all affected patients were analyzed through retrospective chart review, along with the pathogen’s antimicrobial susceptibility results. In total, 106 episodes of neonatal sepsis were described; 31% (n = 33) being caused by GBS and 69% (n = 73) by E. coli; 87% of GBS early-onset disease (EOD) cases did not receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP). Contrary to general trends, the proportion of resistant E. coli isolates decreased for all tested antibiotics over time. Coincidentally, antenatal antibiotic use beyond IAP during that period decreased significantly in our center. Conclusions: (1) Data at our center suggests at least a regional implementation gap in GBS screening and IAP. (2) The decline in the resistance rate of E. coli for all antimicrobial substances might indicate that the reduction of prenatal antibiotics use is beneficial and that neonatal antibiotic stewardship programs should include pregnant women as well. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00431-020-03659-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-23 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7547982/ /pubmed/32447562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03659-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Doenhardt, Maren
Seipolt, Barbara
Mense, Lars
Winkler, Jennifer Lucia
Thürmer, Alexander
Rüdiger, Mario
Berner, Reinhard
Armann, Jakob
Neonatal and young infant sepsis by Group B Streptococci and Escherichia coli: a single-center retrospective analysis in Germany—GBS screening implementation gaps and reduction in antibiotic resistance
title Neonatal and young infant sepsis by Group B Streptococci and Escherichia coli: a single-center retrospective analysis in Germany—GBS screening implementation gaps and reduction in antibiotic resistance
title_full Neonatal and young infant sepsis by Group B Streptococci and Escherichia coli: a single-center retrospective analysis in Germany—GBS screening implementation gaps and reduction in antibiotic resistance
title_fullStr Neonatal and young infant sepsis by Group B Streptococci and Escherichia coli: a single-center retrospective analysis in Germany—GBS screening implementation gaps and reduction in antibiotic resistance
title_full_unstemmed Neonatal and young infant sepsis by Group B Streptococci and Escherichia coli: a single-center retrospective analysis in Germany—GBS screening implementation gaps and reduction in antibiotic resistance
title_short Neonatal and young infant sepsis by Group B Streptococci and Escherichia coli: a single-center retrospective analysis in Germany—GBS screening implementation gaps and reduction in antibiotic resistance
title_sort neonatal and young infant sepsis by group b streptococci and escherichia coli: a single-center retrospective analysis in germany—gbs screening implementation gaps and reduction in antibiotic resistance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32447562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03659-8
work_keys_str_mv AT doenhardtmaren neonatalandyounginfantsepsisbygroupbstreptococciandescherichiacoliasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisingermanygbsscreeningimplementationgapsandreductioninantibioticresistance
AT seipoltbarbara neonatalandyounginfantsepsisbygroupbstreptococciandescherichiacoliasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisingermanygbsscreeningimplementationgapsandreductioninantibioticresistance
AT menselars neonatalandyounginfantsepsisbygroupbstreptococciandescherichiacoliasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisingermanygbsscreeningimplementationgapsandreductioninantibioticresistance
AT winklerjenniferlucia neonatalandyounginfantsepsisbygroupbstreptococciandescherichiacoliasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisingermanygbsscreeningimplementationgapsandreductioninantibioticresistance
AT thurmeralexander neonatalandyounginfantsepsisbygroupbstreptococciandescherichiacoliasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisingermanygbsscreeningimplementationgapsandreductioninantibioticresistance
AT rudigermario neonatalandyounginfantsepsisbygroupbstreptococciandescherichiacoliasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisingermanygbsscreeningimplementationgapsandreductioninantibioticresistance
AT bernerreinhard neonatalandyounginfantsepsisbygroupbstreptococciandescherichiacoliasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisingermanygbsscreeningimplementationgapsandreductioninantibioticresistance
AT armannjakob neonatalandyounginfantsepsisbygroupbstreptococciandescherichiacoliasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisingermanygbsscreeningimplementationgapsandreductioninantibioticresistance