Cargando…

Performance of a capnodynamic method estimating cardiac output during respiratory failure - before and after lung recruitment

Respiratory failure may cause hemodynamic instability with strain on the right ventricle. The capnodynamic method continuously calculates cardiac output (CO) based on effective pulmonary blood flow (CO(EPBF)) and could provide CO monitoring complementary to mechanical ventilation during surgery and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sigmundsson, Thorir Svavar, Öhman, Tomas, Hallbäck, Magnus, Redondo, Eider, Sipmann, Fernando Suarez, Wallin, Mats, Oldner, Anders, Hällsjö-Sander, Caroline, Björne, Håkan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31745763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00421-w
Descripción
Sumario:Respiratory failure may cause hemodynamic instability with strain on the right ventricle. The capnodynamic method continuously calculates cardiac output (CO) based on effective pulmonary blood flow (CO(EPBF)) and could provide CO monitoring complementary to mechanical ventilation during surgery and intensive care. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the ability of a revised capnodynamic method, based on short expiratory holds (CO(EPBFexp)), to estimate CO during acute respiratory failure (LI) with high shunt fractions before and after compliance-based lung recruitment. Ten pigs were submitted to lung lavage and subsequent ventilator-induced lung injury. CO(EPBFexp), without any shunt correction, was compared to a reference method for CO, an ultrasonic flow probe placed around the pulmonary artery trunk (CO(TS)) at (1) baseline in healthy lungs with PEEP 5 cmH(2)O (HL(P5)), (2) LI with PEEP 5 cmH(2)O (LI(P5)) and (3) LI after lung recruitment and PEEP adjustment (LI(Padj)). CO changes were enforced during LI(P5) and LI(Padj) to estimate trending. LI resulted in changes in shunt fraction from 0.1 (0.03) to 0.36 (0.1) and restored to 0.09 (0.04) after recruitment manoeuvre. Bias (levels of agreement) and percentage error between CO(EPBFexp) and CO(TS) changed from 0.5 (− 0.5 to 1.5) L/min and 30% at HL(P5) to − 0.6 (− 2.3 to 1.1) L/min and 39% during LI(P5) and finally 1.1 (− 0.3 to 2.5) L/min and 38% at LI(Padj). Concordance during CO changes improved from 87 to 100% after lung recruitment and PEEP adjustment. CO(EPBFexp) could possibly be used for continuous CO monitoring and trending in hemodynamically unstable patients with increased shunt and after recruitment manoeuvre. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10877-019-00421-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.