Cargando…

Microsurgical seminal reconstruction; our experiences in a single institute

We assessed the contribution of microsurgical seminal reconstruction to achieving natural conception in conjunction with advanced assisted reproductive technologies. Ninety obstructive azoospermic subjects who underwent microsurgical seminal reconstruction were evaluated. Vasovasostomy (VV) was unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hibi, Hatsuki, Sugie, Miho, Ohori, Tadashi, Sonohara, Megumi, Fukunaga, Noritaka, Asada, Yoshimasa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nagoya University 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33132432
http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.82.3.477
_version_ 1783592583062093824
author Hibi, Hatsuki
Sugie, Miho
Ohori, Tadashi
Sonohara, Megumi
Fukunaga, Noritaka
Asada, Yoshimasa
author_facet Hibi, Hatsuki
Sugie, Miho
Ohori, Tadashi
Sonohara, Megumi
Fukunaga, Noritaka
Asada, Yoshimasa
author_sort Hibi, Hatsuki
collection PubMed
description We assessed the contribution of microsurgical seminal reconstruction to achieving natural conception in conjunction with advanced assisted reproductive technologies. Ninety obstructive azoospermic subjects who underwent microsurgical seminal reconstruction were evaluated. Vasovasostomy (VV) was undertaken in 45 subjects whereas vasoepididymostomy (VE) in 45, respectively. VV was performed by employing a two microlayer anastomotic technique, whilst VE was undertaken using double needle longitudinal vaspepididymostomy (LIVE). Patency was achieved in 41 VV (91.1%), and 25 VE (55.6%) cases. In cases where patency was achieved, pregnancy and healthy delivery were recorded following natural intercourse in 7/41 (17.0%) VV, and in 7/25 (28.0%) VE cases. Where patency was not achieved, the use of cryopreserved sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), resulted in a healthy delivery in 4/4 (100%) VV and 14/21 (66.6%) in VE subjects. Although natural pregnancy was achieved only in a limited number of subjects treated (14/90; 15.6%), sperm harvested during surgery and cryopreserved for future ICSI use proved valuable, doubling the overall delivery rate (32/90; 36.6%). Surgical intervention is considered to be a useful technique in order to allow the possibility of a natural conception and by harvesting sperm at the same time contributes to the cost-effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7548240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nagoya University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75482402020-10-30 Microsurgical seminal reconstruction; our experiences in a single institute Hibi, Hatsuki Sugie, Miho Ohori, Tadashi Sonohara, Megumi Fukunaga, Noritaka Asada, Yoshimasa Nagoya J Med Sci Original Paper We assessed the contribution of microsurgical seminal reconstruction to achieving natural conception in conjunction with advanced assisted reproductive technologies. Ninety obstructive azoospermic subjects who underwent microsurgical seminal reconstruction were evaluated. Vasovasostomy (VV) was undertaken in 45 subjects whereas vasoepididymostomy (VE) in 45, respectively. VV was performed by employing a two microlayer anastomotic technique, whilst VE was undertaken using double needle longitudinal vaspepididymostomy (LIVE). Patency was achieved in 41 VV (91.1%), and 25 VE (55.6%) cases. In cases where patency was achieved, pregnancy and healthy delivery were recorded following natural intercourse in 7/41 (17.0%) VV, and in 7/25 (28.0%) VE cases. Where patency was not achieved, the use of cryopreserved sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), resulted in a healthy delivery in 4/4 (100%) VV and 14/21 (66.6%) in VE subjects. Although natural pregnancy was achieved only in a limited number of subjects treated (14/90; 15.6%), sperm harvested during surgery and cryopreserved for future ICSI use proved valuable, doubling the overall delivery rate (32/90; 36.6%). Surgical intervention is considered to be a useful technique in order to allow the possibility of a natural conception and by harvesting sperm at the same time contributes to the cost-effectiveness. Nagoya University 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7548240/ /pubmed/33132432 http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.82.3.477 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hibi, Hatsuki
Sugie, Miho
Ohori, Tadashi
Sonohara, Megumi
Fukunaga, Noritaka
Asada, Yoshimasa
Microsurgical seminal reconstruction; our experiences in a single institute
title Microsurgical seminal reconstruction; our experiences in a single institute
title_full Microsurgical seminal reconstruction; our experiences in a single institute
title_fullStr Microsurgical seminal reconstruction; our experiences in a single institute
title_full_unstemmed Microsurgical seminal reconstruction; our experiences in a single institute
title_short Microsurgical seminal reconstruction; our experiences in a single institute
title_sort microsurgical seminal reconstruction; our experiences in a single institute
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33132432
http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.82.3.477
work_keys_str_mv AT hibihatsuki microsurgicalseminalreconstructionourexperiencesinasingleinstitute
AT sugiemiho microsurgicalseminalreconstructionourexperiencesinasingleinstitute
AT ohoritadashi microsurgicalseminalreconstructionourexperiencesinasingleinstitute
AT sonoharamegumi microsurgicalseminalreconstructionourexperiencesinasingleinstitute
AT fukunaganoritaka microsurgicalseminalreconstructionourexperiencesinasingleinstitute
AT asadayoshimasa microsurgicalseminalreconstructionourexperiencesinasingleinstitute