Cargando…

Assessment of the peripheral microcirculation in patients with and without shock: a pilot study on different methods

Microvascular dysfunction has been associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients, and the current concept of hemodynamic incoherence has gained attention. Our objective was to perform a comprehensive analysis of microcirculatory perfusion parameters and to investigate the best variable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Filho, Roberto Rabello, de Freitas Chaves, Renato Carneiro, Assunção, Murillo Santucci Cesar, Neto, Ary Serpa, De Freitas, Flavia Manfredi, Romagnoli, Maria Laura, Silva, Eliézer, Lattanzio, Bernardo, Dubin, Arnaldo, Corrêa, Thiago Domingos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31754965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00423-8
_version_ 1783592589060997120
author Filho, Roberto Rabello
de Freitas Chaves, Renato Carneiro
Assunção, Murillo Santucci Cesar
Neto, Ary Serpa
De Freitas, Flavia Manfredi
Romagnoli, Maria Laura
Silva, Eliézer
Lattanzio, Bernardo
Dubin, Arnaldo
Corrêa, Thiago Domingos
author_facet Filho, Roberto Rabello
de Freitas Chaves, Renato Carneiro
Assunção, Murillo Santucci Cesar
Neto, Ary Serpa
De Freitas, Flavia Manfredi
Romagnoli, Maria Laura
Silva, Eliézer
Lattanzio, Bernardo
Dubin, Arnaldo
Corrêa, Thiago Domingos
author_sort Filho, Roberto Rabello
collection PubMed
description Microvascular dysfunction has been associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients, and the current concept of hemodynamic incoherence has gained attention. Our objective was to perform a comprehensive analysis of microcirculatory perfusion parameters and to investigate the best variables that could discriminate patients with and without circulatory shock during early intensive care unit (ICU) admission. This prospective observational study comprised a sample of 40 adult patients with and without circulatory shock (n = 20, each) admitted to the ICU within 24 h. Peripheral clinical [capillary refill time (CRT), peripheral perfusion index (PPI), skin-temperature gradient (Tskin-diff)] and laboratory [arterial lactate and base excess (BE)] perfusion parameters, in addition to near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-derived variables were simultaneously assessed. While lactate, BE, CRT, PPI and Tskin-diff did not differ significantly between the groups, shock patients had lower baseline tissue oxygen saturation (StO(2)) [81 (76–83) % vs. 86 (76–90) %, p = 0.044], lower StO(2)min [50 (47–57) % vs. 55 (53–65)  %, p = 0.038] and lower StO(2)max [87 (80–92) % vs. 93 (90–95) %, p = 0.017] than patients without shock. Additionally, dynamic NIRS variables [recovery time (r = 0.56, p = 0.010), descending slope (r = − 0.44, p = 0.05) and ascending slope (r = − 0.54, p = 0.014)] and not static variable [baseline StO(2) (r = − 0.24, p = 0.28)] exhibited a significant correlation with the administered dose of norepinephrine. In our study with critically ill patients assessed within the first twenty-four hours of ICU admission, among the perfusion parameters, only NIRS-derived parameters could discriminate patients with and without shock. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10877-019-00423-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7548274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75482742020-10-20 Assessment of the peripheral microcirculation in patients with and without shock: a pilot study on different methods Filho, Roberto Rabello de Freitas Chaves, Renato Carneiro Assunção, Murillo Santucci Cesar Neto, Ary Serpa De Freitas, Flavia Manfredi Romagnoli, Maria Laura Silva, Eliézer Lattanzio, Bernardo Dubin, Arnaldo Corrêa, Thiago Domingos J Clin Monit Comput Original Research Microvascular dysfunction has been associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients, and the current concept of hemodynamic incoherence has gained attention. Our objective was to perform a comprehensive analysis of microcirculatory perfusion parameters and to investigate the best variables that could discriminate patients with and without circulatory shock during early intensive care unit (ICU) admission. This prospective observational study comprised a sample of 40 adult patients with and without circulatory shock (n = 20, each) admitted to the ICU within 24 h. Peripheral clinical [capillary refill time (CRT), peripheral perfusion index (PPI), skin-temperature gradient (Tskin-diff)] and laboratory [arterial lactate and base excess (BE)] perfusion parameters, in addition to near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-derived variables were simultaneously assessed. While lactate, BE, CRT, PPI and Tskin-diff did not differ significantly between the groups, shock patients had lower baseline tissue oxygen saturation (StO(2)) [81 (76–83) % vs. 86 (76–90) %, p = 0.044], lower StO(2)min [50 (47–57) % vs. 55 (53–65)  %, p = 0.038] and lower StO(2)max [87 (80–92) % vs. 93 (90–95) %, p = 0.017] than patients without shock. Additionally, dynamic NIRS variables [recovery time (r = 0.56, p = 0.010), descending slope (r = − 0.44, p = 0.05) and ascending slope (r = − 0.54, p = 0.014)] and not static variable [baseline StO(2) (r = − 0.24, p = 0.28)] exhibited a significant correlation with the administered dose of norepinephrine. In our study with critically ill patients assessed within the first twenty-four hours of ICU admission, among the perfusion parameters, only NIRS-derived parameters could discriminate patients with and without shock. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10877-019-00423-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2019-11-21 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7548274/ /pubmed/31754965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00423-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Filho, Roberto Rabello
de Freitas Chaves, Renato Carneiro
Assunção, Murillo Santucci Cesar
Neto, Ary Serpa
De Freitas, Flavia Manfredi
Romagnoli, Maria Laura
Silva, Eliézer
Lattanzio, Bernardo
Dubin, Arnaldo
Corrêa, Thiago Domingos
Assessment of the peripheral microcirculation in patients with and without shock: a pilot study on different methods
title Assessment of the peripheral microcirculation in patients with and without shock: a pilot study on different methods
title_full Assessment of the peripheral microcirculation in patients with and without shock: a pilot study on different methods
title_fullStr Assessment of the peripheral microcirculation in patients with and without shock: a pilot study on different methods
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the peripheral microcirculation in patients with and without shock: a pilot study on different methods
title_short Assessment of the peripheral microcirculation in patients with and without shock: a pilot study on different methods
title_sort assessment of the peripheral microcirculation in patients with and without shock: a pilot study on different methods
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31754965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00423-8
work_keys_str_mv AT filhorobertorabello assessmentoftheperipheralmicrocirculationinpatientswithandwithoutshockapilotstudyondifferentmethods
AT defreitaschavesrenatocarneiro assessmentoftheperipheralmicrocirculationinpatientswithandwithoutshockapilotstudyondifferentmethods
AT assuncaomurillosantuccicesar assessmentoftheperipheralmicrocirculationinpatientswithandwithoutshockapilotstudyondifferentmethods
AT netoaryserpa assessmentoftheperipheralmicrocirculationinpatientswithandwithoutshockapilotstudyondifferentmethods
AT defreitasflaviamanfredi assessmentoftheperipheralmicrocirculationinpatientswithandwithoutshockapilotstudyondifferentmethods
AT romagnolimarialaura assessmentoftheperipheralmicrocirculationinpatientswithandwithoutshockapilotstudyondifferentmethods
AT silvaeliezer assessmentoftheperipheralmicrocirculationinpatientswithandwithoutshockapilotstudyondifferentmethods
AT lattanziobernardo assessmentoftheperipheralmicrocirculationinpatientswithandwithoutshockapilotstudyondifferentmethods
AT dubinarnaldo assessmentoftheperipheralmicrocirculationinpatientswithandwithoutshockapilotstudyondifferentmethods
AT correathiagodomingos assessmentoftheperipheralmicrocirculationinpatientswithandwithoutshockapilotstudyondifferentmethods