Cargando…

The zone of latent solutions and its relevance to understanding ape cultures

The zone of latent solutions (ZLS) hypothesis provides an alternative approach to explaining cultural patterns in primates and many other animals. According to the ZLS hypothesis, non-human great ape (henceforth: ape) cultures consist largely or solely of latent solutions. The current competing (and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tennie, Claudio, Bandini, Elisa, van Schaik, Carel P., Hopper, Lydia M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33093737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10539-020-09769-9
_version_ 1783592589769834496
author Tennie, Claudio
Bandini, Elisa
van Schaik, Carel P.
Hopper, Lydia M.
author_facet Tennie, Claudio
Bandini, Elisa
van Schaik, Carel P.
Hopper, Lydia M.
author_sort Tennie, Claudio
collection PubMed
description The zone of latent solutions (ZLS) hypothesis provides an alternative approach to explaining cultural patterns in primates and many other animals. According to the ZLS hypothesis, non-human great ape (henceforth: ape) cultures consist largely or solely of latent solutions. The current competing (and predominant) hypothesis for ape culture argues instead that at least some of their behavioural or artefact forms are copied through specific social learning mechanisms (“copying social learning hypothesis”) and that their forms may depend on copying (copying-dependent forms). In contrast, the ape ZLS hypothesis does not require these forms to be copied. Instead, it suggests that several (non-form-copying) social learning mechanisms help determine the frequency (but typically not the form) of these behaviours and artefacts within connected individuals. The ZLS hypothesis thus suggests that increases and stabilisations of a particular behaviour’s or artefact’s frequency can derive from socially-mediated (cued) form reinnovations. Therefore, and while genes and ecology play important roles as well, according to the ape ZLS hypothesis, apes typically acquire the forms of their behaviours and artefacts individually, but are usually socially induced to do so (provided sufficient opportunity, necessity, motivation and timing). The ZLS approach is often criticized—perhaps also because it challenges the current null hypothesis, which instead assumes a requirement of form-copying social learning mechanisms to explain many ape behavioural (and/or artefact) forms. However, as the ZLS hypothesis is a new approach, with less accumulated literature compared to the current null hypothesis, some confusion is to be expected. Here, we clarify the ZLS approach—also in relation to other competing hypotheses—and address misconceptions and objections. We believe that these clarifications will provide researchers with a coherent theoretical approach and an experimental methodology to examine the necessity of form-copying variants of social learning in apes, humans and other species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7548278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75482782020-10-20 The zone of latent solutions and its relevance to understanding ape cultures Tennie, Claudio Bandini, Elisa van Schaik, Carel P. Hopper, Lydia M. Biol Philos Article The zone of latent solutions (ZLS) hypothesis provides an alternative approach to explaining cultural patterns in primates and many other animals. According to the ZLS hypothesis, non-human great ape (henceforth: ape) cultures consist largely or solely of latent solutions. The current competing (and predominant) hypothesis for ape culture argues instead that at least some of their behavioural or artefact forms are copied through specific social learning mechanisms (“copying social learning hypothesis”) and that their forms may depend on copying (copying-dependent forms). In contrast, the ape ZLS hypothesis does not require these forms to be copied. Instead, it suggests that several (non-form-copying) social learning mechanisms help determine the frequency (but typically not the form) of these behaviours and artefacts within connected individuals. The ZLS hypothesis thus suggests that increases and stabilisations of a particular behaviour’s or artefact’s frequency can derive from socially-mediated (cued) form reinnovations. Therefore, and while genes and ecology play important roles as well, according to the ape ZLS hypothesis, apes typically acquire the forms of their behaviours and artefacts individually, but are usually socially induced to do so (provided sufficient opportunity, necessity, motivation and timing). The ZLS approach is often criticized—perhaps also because it challenges the current null hypothesis, which instead assumes a requirement of form-copying social learning mechanisms to explain many ape behavioural (and/or artefact) forms. However, as the ZLS hypothesis is a new approach, with less accumulated literature compared to the current null hypothesis, some confusion is to be expected. Here, we clarify the ZLS approach—also in relation to other competing hypotheses—and address misconceptions and objections. We believe that these clarifications will provide researchers with a coherent theoretical approach and an experimental methodology to examine the necessity of form-copying variants of social learning in apes, humans and other species. Springer Netherlands 2020-10-11 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7548278/ /pubmed/33093737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10539-020-09769-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Tennie, Claudio
Bandini, Elisa
van Schaik, Carel P.
Hopper, Lydia M.
The zone of latent solutions and its relevance to understanding ape cultures
title The zone of latent solutions and its relevance to understanding ape cultures
title_full The zone of latent solutions and its relevance to understanding ape cultures
title_fullStr The zone of latent solutions and its relevance to understanding ape cultures
title_full_unstemmed The zone of latent solutions and its relevance to understanding ape cultures
title_short The zone of latent solutions and its relevance to understanding ape cultures
title_sort zone of latent solutions and its relevance to understanding ape cultures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33093737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10539-020-09769-9
work_keys_str_mv AT tennieclaudio thezoneoflatentsolutionsanditsrelevancetounderstandingapecultures
AT bandinielisa thezoneoflatentsolutionsanditsrelevancetounderstandingapecultures
AT vanschaikcarelp thezoneoflatentsolutionsanditsrelevancetounderstandingapecultures
AT hopperlydiam thezoneoflatentsolutionsanditsrelevancetounderstandingapecultures
AT tennieclaudio zoneoflatentsolutionsanditsrelevancetounderstandingapecultures
AT bandinielisa zoneoflatentsolutionsanditsrelevancetounderstandingapecultures
AT vanschaikcarelp zoneoflatentsolutionsanditsrelevancetounderstandingapecultures
AT hopperlydiam zoneoflatentsolutionsanditsrelevancetounderstandingapecultures