Cargando…

Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: A porcine study

OBJECTIVE: This study hypothesized that the suture anchor of tibial fixation method of PMMR repair technique is the main factor which reduce the gap formation or over displacement of tear site in initial healing, and then investigated the fixation stability of 4 different tibial fixations through cy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Shen-Han, Yeh, Tsu-Te, Hsu, Wei-Chun, Wu, Alexander T.H., Li, Guoan, Chen, Chih-Hwa, Lee, Chian-Her, Wu, Jia-Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2020.01.006
_version_ 1783592603820752896
author Wu, Shen-Han
Yeh, Tsu-Te
Hsu, Wei-Chun
Wu, Alexander T.H.
Li, Guoan
Chen, Chih-Hwa
Lee, Chian-Her
Wu, Jia-Lin
author_facet Wu, Shen-Han
Yeh, Tsu-Te
Hsu, Wei-Chun
Wu, Alexander T.H.
Li, Guoan
Chen, Chih-Hwa
Lee, Chian-Her
Wu, Jia-Lin
author_sort Wu, Shen-Han
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study hypothesized that the suture anchor of tibial fixation method of PMMR repair technique is the main factor which reduce the gap formation or over displacement of tear site in initial healing, and then investigated the fixation stability of 4 different tibial fixations through cyclic and ultimate failure load testing of meniscal root sutures. METHODS: Twenty-four porcine tibiae with intact medial meniscus roots were randomly assigned into 4 groups: transosseous suture, washer, suture anchor, or screw with washer. Each sample underwent cyclic loading followed by a load-to-failure test. Displacement, maximum load to failure, stiffness, and elongation at failure load were recorded. RESULTS: The maximum average load and displacement at failure for each of the repair groups were as follows: transosseous suture, 232.8 N and 12.16 mm; washer, 189.9 N and 21.5 mm; suture anchor, 140.6 N and 13.8 mm; and screw with washer, 167.9 N and 18.9 mm. The maximum stiffness values for each of the repair groups were as follows: transosseous suture, 19.5 ± 0.7 N/mm; washer, 21.5 ± 1.4 N/mm; suture anchor, 13.8 ± 0.7 N/mm; and screw with washer, 18.9 ± 3.9 N/mm. The mean elongation across the repairs for each of the repair groups after 1000 loading cycles was: transosseous suture, 3.74 ± 0.28 mm; washer, 3.04 ± 0.13 mm; suture anchor, 2.25 ± 0.33 mm; and screw with washer, 2.43 ± 0.19 mm. The mean elongation was significantly less with the suture anchor than with the other techniques (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Under physiological loading, our results indicate that a slower rehabilitation program with limited flexion and only partial weight bearing is advised when using a suture anchor because of the lower maximum load and stiffness. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: Tibial fixation using a washer or a screw with a washer is an effective and cost-saving technique when an option is required with high stiffness and low displacement at failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7548383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75483832020-10-22 Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: A porcine study Wu, Shen-Han Yeh, Tsu-Te Hsu, Wei-Chun Wu, Alexander T.H. Li, Guoan Chen, Chih-Hwa Lee, Chian-Her Wu, Jia-Lin J Orthop Translat Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study hypothesized that the suture anchor of tibial fixation method of PMMR repair technique is the main factor which reduce the gap formation or over displacement of tear site in initial healing, and then investigated the fixation stability of 4 different tibial fixations through cyclic and ultimate failure load testing of meniscal root sutures. METHODS: Twenty-four porcine tibiae with intact medial meniscus roots were randomly assigned into 4 groups: transosseous suture, washer, suture anchor, or screw with washer. Each sample underwent cyclic loading followed by a load-to-failure test. Displacement, maximum load to failure, stiffness, and elongation at failure load were recorded. RESULTS: The maximum average load and displacement at failure for each of the repair groups were as follows: transosseous suture, 232.8 N and 12.16 mm; washer, 189.9 N and 21.5 mm; suture anchor, 140.6 N and 13.8 mm; and screw with washer, 167.9 N and 18.9 mm. The maximum stiffness values for each of the repair groups were as follows: transosseous suture, 19.5 ± 0.7 N/mm; washer, 21.5 ± 1.4 N/mm; suture anchor, 13.8 ± 0.7 N/mm; and screw with washer, 18.9 ± 3.9 N/mm. The mean elongation across the repairs for each of the repair groups after 1000 loading cycles was: transosseous suture, 3.74 ± 0.28 mm; washer, 3.04 ± 0.13 mm; suture anchor, 2.25 ± 0.33 mm; and screw with washer, 2.43 ± 0.19 mm. The mean elongation was significantly less with the suture anchor than with the other techniques (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Under physiological loading, our results indicate that a slower rehabilitation program with limited flexion and only partial weight bearing is advised when using a suture anchor because of the lower maximum load and stiffness. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: Tibial fixation using a washer or a screw with a washer is an effective and cost-saving technique when an option is required with high stiffness and low displacement at failure. Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7548383/ /pubmed/33101964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2020.01.006 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Wu, Shen-Han
Yeh, Tsu-Te
Hsu, Wei-Chun
Wu, Alexander T.H.
Li, Guoan
Chen, Chih-Hwa
Lee, Chian-Her
Wu, Jia-Lin
Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: A porcine study
title Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: A porcine study
title_full Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: A porcine study
title_fullStr Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: A porcine study
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: A porcine study
title_short Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: A porcine study
title_sort biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: a porcine study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2020.01.006
work_keys_str_mv AT wushenhan biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtibialfixationtechniquesformeniscalrootsuturesinposteriormedialmeniscusrootrepairaporcinestudy
AT yehtsute biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtibialfixationtechniquesformeniscalrootsuturesinposteriormedialmeniscusrootrepairaporcinestudy
AT hsuweichun biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtibialfixationtechniquesformeniscalrootsuturesinposteriormedialmeniscusrootrepairaporcinestudy
AT wualexanderth biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtibialfixationtechniquesformeniscalrootsuturesinposteriormedialmeniscusrootrepairaporcinestudy
AT liguoan biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtibialfixationtechniquesformeniscalrootsuturesinposteriormedialmeniscusrootrepairaporcinestudy
AT chenchihhwa biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtibialfixationtechniquesformeniscalrootsuturesinposteriormedialmeniscusrootrepairaporcinestudy
AT leechianher biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtibialfixationtechniquesformeniscalrootsuturesinposteriormedialmeniscusrootrepairaporcinestudy
AT wujialin biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtibialfixationtechniquesformeniscalrootsuturesinposteriormedialmeniscusrootrepairaporcinestudy