Cargando…
Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: A porcine study
OBJECTIVE: This study hypothesized that the suture anchor of tibial fixation method of PMMR repair technique is the main factor which reduce the gap formation or over displacement of tear site in initial healing, and then investigated the fixation stability of 4 different tibial fixations through cy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2020.01.006 |
_version_ | 1783592603820752896 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Shen-Han Yeh, Tsu-Te Hsu, Wei-Chun Wu, Alexander T.H. Li, Guoan Chen, Chih-Hwa Lee, Chian-Her Wu, Jia-Lin |
author_facet | Wu, Shen-Han Yeh, Tsu-Te Hsu, Wei-Chun Wu, Alexander T.H. Li, Guoan Chen, Chih-Hwa Lee, Chian-Her Wu, Jia-Lin |
author_sort | Wu, Shen-Han |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study hypothesized that the suture anchor of tibial fixation method of PMMR repair technique is the main factor which reduce the gap formation or over displacement of tear site in initial healing, and then investigated the fixation stability of 4 different tibial fixations through cyclic and ultimate failure load testing of meniscal root sutures. METHODS: Twenty-four porcine tibiae with intact medial meniscus roots were randomly assigned into 4 groups: transosseous suture, washer, suture anchor, or screw with washer. Each sample underwent cyclic loading followed by a load-to-failure test. Displacement, maximum load to failure, stiffness, and elongation at failure load were recorded. RESULTS: The maximum average load and displacement at failure for each of the repair groups were as follows: transosseous suture, 232.8 N and 12.16 mm; washer, 189.9 N and 21.5 mm; suture anchor, 140.6 N and 13.8 mm; and screw with washer, 167.9 N and 18.9 mm. The maximum stiffness values for each of the repair groups were as follows: transosseous suture, 19.5 ± 0.7 N/mm; washer, 21.5 ± 1.4 N/mm; suture anchor, 13.8 ± 0.7 N/mm; and screw with washer, 18.9 ± 3.9 N/mm. The mean elongation across the repairs for each of the repair groups after 1000 loading cycles was: transosseous suture, 3.74 ± 0.28 mm; washer, 3.04 ± 0.13 mm; suture anchor, 2.25 ± 0.33 mm; and screw with washer, 2.43 ± 0.19 mm. The mean elongation was significantly less with the suture anchor than with the other techniques (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Under physiological loading, our results indicate that a slower rehabilitation program with limited flexion and only partial weight bearing is advised when using a suture anchor because of the lower maximum load and stiffness. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: Tibial fixation using a washer or a screw with a washer is an effective and cost-saving technique when an option is required with high stiffness and low displacement at failure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7548383 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75483832020-10-22 Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: A porcine study Wu, Shen-Han Yeh, Tsu-Te Hsu, Wei-Chun Wu, Alexander T.H. Li, Guoan Chen, Chih-Hwa Lee, Chian-Her Wu, Jia-Lin J Orthop Translat Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study hypothesized that the suture anchor of tibial fixation method of PMMR repair technique is the main factor which reduce the gap formation or over displacement of tear site in initial healing, and then investigated the fixation stability of 4 different tibial fixations through cyclic and ultimate failure load testing of meniscal root sutures. METHODS: Twenty-four porcine tibiae with intact medial meniscus roots were randomly assigned into 4 groups: transosseous suture, washer, suture anchor, or screw with washer. Each sample underwent cyclic loading followed by a load-to-failure test. Displacement, maximum load to failure, stiffness, and elongation at failure load were recorded. RESULTS: The maximum average load and displacement at failure for each of the repair groups were as follows: transosseous suture, 232.8 N and 12.16 mm; washer, 189.9 N and 21.5 mm; suture anchor, 140.6 N and 13.8 mm; and screw with washer, 167.9 N and 18.9 mm. The maximum stiffness values for each of the repair groups were as follows: transosseous suture, 19.5 ± 0.7 N/mm; washer, 21.5 ± 1.4 N/mm; suture anchor, 13.8 ± 0.7 N/mm; and screw with washer, 18.9 ± 3.9 N/mm. The mean elongation across the repairs for each of the repair groups after 1000 loading cycles was: transosseous suture, 3.74 ± 0.28 mm; washer, 3.04 ± 0.13 mm; suture anchor, 2.25 ± 0.33 mm; and screw with washer, 2.43 ± 0.19 mm. The mean elongation was significantly less with the suture anchor than with the other techniques (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Under physiological loading, our results indicate that a slower rehabilitation program with limited flexion and only partial weight bearing is advised when using a suture anchor because of the lower maximum load and stiffness. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: Tibial fixation using a washer or a screw with a washer is an effective and cost-saving technique when an option is required with high stiffness and low displacement at failure. Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7548383/ /pubmed/33101964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2020.01.006 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wu, Shen-Han Yeh, Tsu-Te Hsu, Wei-Chun Wu, Alexander T.H. Li, Guoan Chen, Chih-Hwa Lee, Chian-Her Wu, Jia-Lin Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: A porcine study |
title | Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: A porcine study |
title_full | Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: A porcine study |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: A porcine study |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: A porcine study |
title_short | Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: A porcine study |
title_sort | biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair: a porcine study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2020.01.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wushenhan biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtibialfixationtechniquesformeniscalrootsuturesinposteriormedialmeniscusrootrepairaporcinestudy AT yehtsute biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtibialfixationtechniquesformeniscalrootsuturesinposteriormedialmeniscusrootrepairaporcinestudy AT hsuweichun biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtibialfixationtechniquesformeniscalrootsuturesinposteriormedialmeniscusrootrepairaporcinestudy AT wualexanderth biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtibialfixationtechniquesformeniscalrootsuturesinposteriormedialmeniscusrootrepairaporcinestudy AT liguoan biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtibialfixationtechniquesformeniscalrootsuturesinposteriormedialmeniscusrootrepairaporcinestudy AT chenchihhwa biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtibialfixationtechniquesformeniscalrootsuturesinposteriormedialmeniscusrootrepairaporcinestudy AT leechianher biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtibialfixationtechniquesformeniscalrootsuturesinposteriormedialmeniscusrootrepairaporcinestudy AT wujialin biomechanicalcomparisonoffourtibialfixationtechniquesformeniscalrootsuturesinposteriormedialmeniscusrootrepairaporcinestudy |