Cargando…
PATIENTS UNDERGOING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE CYCLES ARE MORE LIKELY TO FOLLOW UP AFTER ATTEMPTED OUTREACH COMPARED WITH INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION CYCLES DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Autores principales: | Boltja, Chelsea, Zhang, John J., Olcha, Meir |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548640/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.507 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Prognostic factors in intrauterine insemination
cycles
por: Sicchieri, Fernanda, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Luteal phase support in intrauterine insemination cycles
por: Gün, İsmet, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
An Intrauterine Insemination Audit at Tertiary Care Hospital: A 4½ Years' Retrospective Analysis of 800 Intrauterine Insemination Cycles
por: Wadhwa, Leena, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Significance of the serum CA-125 level in intrauterine insemination cycles
por: Choe, Seung Ah, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
The AID study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial of intrauterine insemination in the natural cycle compared with intracervical insemination in the natural cycle
por: Kop, Petronella, et al.
Publicado: (2019)