Cargando…

Current State of the Art of Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders

Prospective full-population newborn screening for multiple lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) is currently practiced in a few NBS programs, and several others are actively pursuing this course of action. Two platforms suitable for multiple LSD screening—tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) and digital m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Millington, David S., Bali, Deeksha S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072946
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns4030024
_version_ 1783592706993291264
author Millington, David S.
Bali, Deeksha S.
author_facet Millington, David S.
Bali, Deeksha S.
author_sort Millington, David S.
collection PubMed
description Prospective full-population newborn screening for multiple lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) is currently practiced in a few NBS programs, and several others are actively pursuing this course of action. Two platforms suitable for multiple LSD screening—tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) and digital microfluidic fluorometry (DMF)—are now commercially available with reagent kits. In this article, we review the methods currently used for prospective NBS for LSDs and objectively compare their workflows and the results from two programs in the United States that screen for the same four LSDs, one using MS/MS and the other DMF. The results show that the DMF platform workflow is simpler and generates results faster than MS/MS, enabling results reporting on the same day as specimen analysis. Furthermore, the performance metrics for both platforms while not identical, are broadly similar and do not indicate the superior performance of one method over the other. Results show a preponderance of inconclusive results for Pompe and Fabry diseases and for Hurler syndrome, due to genetic heterogeneity and other factors that can lead to low enzyme activities, regardless of the screening method. We conclude that either platform is a good choice but caution that post-analytical tools will need to be applied to improve the positive predictive value for these conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7548896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75488962020-10-15 Current State of the Art of Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders Millington, David S. Bali, Deeksha S. Int J Neonatal Screen Review Prospective full-population newborn screening for multiple lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) is currently practiced in a few NBS programs, and several others are actively pursuing this course of action. Two platforms suitable for multiple LSD screening—tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) and digital microfluidic fluorometry (DMF)—are now commercially available with reagent kits. In this article, we review the methods currently used for prospective NBS for LSDs and objectively compare their workflows and the results from two programs in the United States that screen for the same four LSDs, one using MS/MS and the other DMF. The results show that the DMF platform workflow is simpler and generates results faster than MS/MS, enabling results reporting on the same day as specimen analysis. Furthermore, the performance metrics for both platforms while not identical, are broadly similar and do not indicate the superior performance of one method over the other. Results show a preponderance of inconclusive results for Pompe and Fabry diseases and for Hurler syndrome, due to genetic heterogeneity and other factors that can lead to low enzyme activities, regardless of the screening method. We conclude that either platform is a good choice but caution that post-analytical tools will need to be applied to improve the positive predictive value for these conditions. MDPI 2018-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7548896/ /pubmed/33072946 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns4030024 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Millington, David S.
Bali, Deeksha S.
Current State of the Art of Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders
title Current State of the Art of Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders
title_full Current State of the Art of Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders
title_fullStr Current State of the Art of Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders
title_full_unstemmed Current State of the Art of Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders
title_short Current State of the Art of Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders
title_sort current state of the art of newborn screening for lysosomal storage disorders
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072946
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns4030024
work_keys_str_mv AT millingtondavids currentstateoftheartofnewbornscreeningforlysosomalstoragedisorders
AT balideekshas currentstateoftheartofnewbornscreeningforlysosomalstoragedisorders