Cargando…
Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most prevalent heritable cause of cognitive impairment but is not yet included in a newborn screening (NBS) program within Australia. This paper aims to assess the feasibility and reliability of population screening for FXS using a pilot study in one hospital. A total...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns4010009 |
_version_ | 1783592708630118400 |
---|---|
author | Wotton, Tiffany Wiley, Veronica Bennetts, Bruce Christie, Louise Wilcken, Bridget Jenkins, Gemma Rogers, Carolyn Boyle, Jackie Field, Michael |
author_facet | Wotton, Tiffany Wiley, Veronica Bennetts, Bruce Christie, Louise Wilcken, Bridget Jenkins, Gemma Rogers, Carolyn Boyle, Jackie Field, Michael |
author_sort | Wotton, Tiffany |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most prevalent heritable cause of cognitive impairment but is not yet included in a newborn screening (NBS) program within Australia. This paper aims to assess the feasibility and reliability of population screening for FXS using a pilot study in one hospital. A total of 1971 mothers consented for 2000 newborns to be tested using routine NBS dried blood spot samples. DNA was extracted and a modified PCR assay with a chimeric CGG primer was used to detect fragile X alleles in both males and females in the normal, premutation, and full mutation ranges. A routine PCR-based fragile X assay was run in parallel to validate the chimeric primer assay. Babies with CGG repeat number ≥59 were referred for family studies. One thousand nine hundred and ninety NBS samples had a CGG repeat number less than 55 (1986 < 50); 10 had premutation alleles >54 CGG repeats (1/123 females and 1/507 males). There was complete concordance between the two PCR-based assays. A recent review revealed no clinically identified cases in the cohort up to 5 years later. The cost per test was $AUD19. Fragile X status can be determined on routine NBS samples using the chimeric primer assay. However, whilst this assay may not be considered cost-effective for population screening, it could be considered as a second-tier assay to a developed immunoassay for fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7548904 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75489042020-10-15 Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study Wotton, Tiffany Wiley, Veronica Bennetts, Bruce Christie, Louise Wilcken, Bridget Jenkins, Gemma Rogers, Carolyn Boyle, Jackie Field, Michael Int J Neonatal Screen Article Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most prevalent heritable cause of cognitive impairment but is not yet included in a newborn screening (NBS) program within Australia. This paper aims to assess the feasibility and reliability of population screening for FXS using a pilot study in one hospital. A total of 1971 mothers consented for 2000 newborns to be tested using routine NBS dried blood spot samples. DNA was extracted and a modified PCR assay with a chimeric CGG primer was used to detect fragile X alleles in both males and females in the normal, premutation, and full mutation ranges. A routine PCR-based fragile X assay was run in parallel to validate the chimeric primer assay. Babies with CGG repeat number ≥59 were referred for family studies. One thousand nine hundred and ninety NBS samples had a CGG repeat number less than 55 (1986 < 50); 10 had premutation alleles >54 CGG repeats (1/123 females and 1/507 males). There was complete concordance between the two PCR-based assays. A recent review revealed no clinically identified cases in the cohort up to 5 years later. The cost per test was $AUD19. Fragile X status can be determined on routine NBS samples using the chimeric primer assay. However, whilst this assay may not be considered cost-effective for population screening, it could be considered as a second-tier assay to a developed immunoassay for fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP). MDPI 2018-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7548904/ /pubmed/33072935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns4010009 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wotton, Tiffany Wiley, Veronica Bennetts, Bruce Christie, Louise Wilcken, Bridget Jenkins, Gemma Rogers, Carolyn Boyle, Jackie Field, Michael Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study |
title | Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study |
title_full | Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study |
title_fullStr | Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study |
title_short | Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study |
title_sort | are we ready for fragile x newborn screening testing?—lessons learnt from a feasibility study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns4010009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wottontiffany arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy AT wileyveronica arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy AT bennettsbruce arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy AT christielouise arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy AT wilckenbridget arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy AT jenkinsgemma arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy AT rogerscarolyn arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy AT boylejackie arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy AT fieldmichael arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy |