Cargando…

Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most prevalent heritable cause of cognitive impairment but is not yet included in a newborn screening (NBS) program within Australia. This paper aims to assess the feasibility and reliability of population screening for FXS using a pilot study in one hospital. A total...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wotton, Tiffany, Wiley, Veronica, Bennetts, Bruce, Christie, Louise, Wilcken, Bridget, Jenkins, Gemma, Rogers, Carolyn, Boyle, Jackie, Field, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072935
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns4010009
_version_ 1783592708630118400
author Wotton, Tiffany
Wiley, Veronica
Bennetts, Bruce
Christie, Louise
Wilcken, Bridget
Jenkins, Gemma
Rogers, Carolyn
Boyle, Jackie
Field, Michael
author_facet Wotton, Tiffany
Wiley, Veronica
Bennetts, Bruce
Christie, Louise
Wilcken, Bridget
Jenkins, Gemma
Rogers, Carolyn
Boyle, Jackie
Field, Michael
author_sort Wotton, Tiffany
collection PubMed
description Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most prevalent heritable cause of cognitive impairment but is not yet included in a newborn screening (NBS) program within Australia. This paper aims to assess the feasibility and reliability of population screening for FXS using a pilot study in one hospital. A total of 1971 mothers consented for 2000 newborns to be tested using routine NBS dried blood spot samples. DNA was extracted and a modified PCR assay with a chimeric CGG primer was used to detect fragile X alleles in both males and females in the normal, premutation, and full mutation ranges. A routine PCR-based fragile X assay was run in parallel to validate the chimeric primer assay. Babies with CGG repeat number ≥59 were referred for family studies. One thousand nine hundred and ninety NBS samples had a CGG repeat number less than 55 (1986 < 50); 10 had premutation alleles >54 CGG repeats (1/123 females and 1/507 males). There was complete concordance between the two PCR-based assays. A recent review revealed no clinically identified cases in the cohort up to 5 years later. The cost per test was $AUD19. Fragile X status can be determined on routine NBS samples using the chimeric primer assay. However, whilst this assay may not be considered cost-effective for population screening, it could be considered as a second-tier assay to a developed immunoassay for fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7548904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75489042020-10-15 Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study Wotton, Tiffany Wiley, Veronica Bennetts, Bruce Christie, Louise Wilcken, Bridget Jenkins, Gemma Rogers, Carolyn Boyle, Jackie Field, Michael Int J Neonatal Screen Article Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most prevalent heritable cause of cognitive impairment but is not yet included in a newborn screening (NBS) program within Australia. This paper aims to assess the feasibility and reliability of population screening for FXS using a pilot study in one hospital. A total of 1971 mothers consented for 2000 newborns to be tested using routine NBS dried blood spot samples. DNA was extracted and a modified PCR assay with a chimeric CGG primer was used to detect fragile X alleles in both males and females in the normal, premutation, and full mutation ranges. A routine PCR-based fragile X assay was run in parallel to validate the chimeric primer assay. Babies with CGG repeat number ≥59 were referred for family studies. One thousand nine hundred and ninety NBS samples had a CGG repeat number less than 55 (1986 < 50); 10 had premutation alleles >54 CGG repeats (1/123 females and 1/507 males). There was complete concordance between the two PCR-based assays. A recent review revealed no clinically identified cases in the cohort up to 5 years later. The cost per test was $AUD19. Fragile X status can be determined on routine NBS samples using the chimeric primer assay. However, whilst this assay may not be considered cost-effective for population screening, it could be considered as a second-tier assay to a developed immunoassay for fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP). MDPI 2018-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7548904/ /pubmed/33072935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns4010009 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wotton, Tiffany
Wiley, Veronica
Bennetts, Bruce
Christie, Louise
Wilcken, Bridget
Jenkins, Gemma
Rogers, Carolyn
Boyle, Jackie
Field, Michael
Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study
title Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study
title_full Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study
title_short Are We Ready for Fragile X Newborn Screening Testing?—Lessons Learnt from a Feasibility Study
title_sort are we ready for fragile x newborn screening testing?—lessons learnt from a feasibility study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072935
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns4010009
work_keys_str_mv AT wottontiffany arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy
AT wileyveronica arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy
AT bennettsbruce arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy
AT christielouise arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy
AT wilckenbridget arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy
AT jenkinsgemma arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy
AT rogerscarolyn arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy
AT boylejackie arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy
AT fieldmichael arewereadyforfragilexnewbornscreeningtestinglessonslearntfromafeasibilitystudy