Cargando…

Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: A German Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) are abnormal shunts between dural arteries and dural venous sinus or cortical veins. We report our experience with endovascular therapy of primary complex DAVFs using modern embolic agents. METHODS: This is a retrospective ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maus, Volker, Drescher, Finn, Goertz, Lukas, Weber, Anushe, Weber, Werner, Fischer, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7548948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32846415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000509455
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) are abnormal shunts between dural arteries and dural venous sinus or cortical veins. We report our experience with endovascular therapy of primary complex DAVFs using modern embolic agents. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with DAVFs treated between 2015 and 2019. Patient demographics and technical aspects including the use of embolic agent, access to the fistula, number of treatments, occlusion rates, and complications were addressed. Angiographic treatment success was defined as complete occlusion (CO) of the DAVF. RESULTS: Fifty patients were treated endovascularly. Median age was 61 years and 66% were men. The most common symptom was pulsatile tinnitus in 17 patients (34%). The most frequent location of the DAVF was the transverse-sigmoid sinus (40%). Thirty-six fistulas (72%) had cortical venous reflux. Nonadhesive and adhesive liquid agents were used in 92% as a single material or in combination. CO was achieved in 48 patients (96%). In 28 individuals (56%), only 1 procedure was necessary. Nonadhesive liquid agents were exclusively used in 14 patients (28%) with CO attained in every case. For CO of tentorial DAVFs, multiple sessions were more often required than at the other locations (55 vs. 14%, p = 0.0051). Among 93 procedures, the overall complication rate was 3%. The procedure-related mortality rate was 0%. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of intracranial DAVFs is feasible, safe, and effective with high rates of CO. In more than half of the patients, the DAVF was completely occluded after a single procedure. However, in tentorial DAVFs, multiple sessions were more often required.