Cargando…

The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers

The genetic relationships among 24 Indian jujube cultivars (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) were evaluated by genotyping the microsatellite loci using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. The SSR loci were scored by fluorescent labelling and automated detection systems for the high-throughput capillary e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiou, Chu-Ying, Shih, Huei-Chuan, Tsai, Chi-Chu, Jin, Xiao-Lei, Ko, Ya-Zhu, Mantiquilla, Junaldo A., Weng, I-Szu, Chiang, Yu-Chung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05078
_version_ 1783592733053550592
author Chiou, Chu-Ying
Shih, Huei-Chuan
Tsai, Chi-Chu
Jin, Xiao-Lei
Ko, Ya-Zhu
Mantiquilla, Junaldo A.
Weng, I-Szu
Chiang, Yu-Chung
author_facet Chiou, Chu-Ying
Shih, Huei-Chuan
Tsai, Chi-Chu
Jin, Xiao-Lei
Ko, Ya-Zhu
Mantiquilla, Junaldo A.
Weng, I-Szu
Chiang, Yu-Chung
author_sort Chiou, Chu-Ying
collection PubMed
description The genetic relationships among 24 Indian jujube cultivars (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) were evaluated by genotyping the microsatellite loci using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. The SSR loci were scored by fluorescent labelling and automated detection systems for the high-throughput capillary electrophoresis and high-resolution gel electrophoresis. Out of the 29 newly characterized SSR loci, 26 were considered as polymorphic with a total of 181 alleles obtained. The number of alleles ranged from 2–12, while the polymorphism information content ranged from 0.08–0.83, and the expected and observed heterozygosity were 0.04–0.83 and 0.04–0.82, respectively. The allele pattern of Indian jujube for all SSR loci confirmed its karyotype as tetraploid. Similarity coefficients and UPGMA dendrogram revealed that the Taiwanese cultivars consisted of a large ‘A’ clade, which is further divided into ‘A1’ and ‘A2’ groups, and the ‘B’ clade where both are rooted by the wild accession, ‘Chad native’. These four genetic clusters were supported by the results of PCoA and the assignment test. The excess of heterozygotes based on F-statistics was attributed to its mating system as outcrossing and self-incompatible, and the introgression of the presumed mutation-derived cultivars with genetic admixture. Based on this study, SSR markers offer valuable information on the genetic relationship of this tropical fruit tree which is basically in agreement with the genealogy of its breeding history.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7549064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75490642020-10-16 The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers Chiou, Chu-Ying Shih, Huei-Chuan Tsai, Chi-Chu Jin, Xiao-Lei Ko, Ya-Zhu Mantiquilla, Junaldo A. Weng, I-Szu Chiang, Yu-Chung Heliyon Research Article The genetic relationships among 24 Indian jujube cultivars (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) were evaluated by genotyping the microsatellite loci using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. The SSR loci were scored by fluorescent labelling and automated detection systems for the high-throughput capillary electrophoresis and high-resolution gel electrophoresis. Out of the 29 newly characterized SSR loci, 26 were considered as polymorphic with a total of 181 alleles obtained. The number of alleles ranged from 2–12, while the polymorphism information content ranged from 0.08–0.83, and the expected and observed heterozygosity were 0.04–0.83 and 0.04–0.82, respectively. The allele pattern of Indian jujube for all SSR loci confirmed its karyotype as tetraploid. Similarity coefficients and UPGMA dendrogram revealed that the Taiwanese cultivars consisted of a large ‘A’ clade, which is further divided into ‘A1’ and ‘A2’ groups, and the ‘B’ clade where both are rooted by the wild accession, ‘Chad native’. These four genetic clusters were supported by the results of PCoA and the assignment test. The excess of heterozygotes based on F-statistics was attributed to its mating system as outcrossing and self-incompatible, and the introgression of the presumed mutation-derived cultivars with genetic admixture. Based on this study, SSR markers offer valuable information on the genetic relationship of this tropical fruit tree which is basically in agreement with the genealogy of its breeding history. Elsevier 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7549064/ /pubmed/33072904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05078 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Chiou, Chu-Ying
Shih, Huei-Chuan
Tsai, Chi-Chu
Jin, Xiao-Lei
Ko, Ya-Zhu
Mantiquilla, Junaldo A.
Weng, I-Szu
Chiang, Yu-Chung
The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers
title The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers
title_full The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers
title_fullStr The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers
title_full_unstemmed The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers
title_short The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers
title_sort genetic relationships of indian jujube (ziziphus mauritiana lam.) cultivars using ssr markers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05078
work_keys_str_mv AT chiouchuying thegeneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers
AT shihhueichuan thegeneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers
AT tsaichichu thegeneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers
AT jinxiaolei thegeneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers
AT koyazhu thegeneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers
AT mantiquillajunaldoa thegeneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers
AT wengiszu thegeneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers
AT chiangyuchung thegeneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers
AT chiouchuying geneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers
AT shihhueichuan geneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers
AT tsaichichu geneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers
AT jinxiaolei geneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers
AT koyazhu geneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers
AT mantiquillajunaldoa geneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers
AT wengiszu geneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers
AT chiangyuchung geneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers