Cargando…
The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers
The genetic relationships among 24 Indian jujube cultivars (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) were evaluated by genotyping the microsatellite loci using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. The SSR loci were scored by fluorescent labelling and automated detection systems for the high-throughput capillary e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05078 |
_version_ | 1783592733053550592 |
---|---|
author | Chiou, Chu-Ying Shih, Huei-Chuan Tsai, Chi-Chu Jin, Xiao-Lei Ko, Ya-Zhu Mantiquilla, Junaldo A. Weng, I-Szu Chiang, Yu-Chung |
author_facet | Chiou, Chu-Ying Shih, Huei-Chuan Tsai, Chi-Chu Jin, Xiao-Lei Ko, Ya-Zhu Mantiquilla, Junaldo A. Weng, I-Szu Chiang, Yu-Chung |
author_sort | Chiou, Chu-Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | The genetic relationships among 24 Indian jujube cultivars (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) were evaluated by genotyping the microsatellite loci using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. The SSR loci were scored by fluorescent labelling and automated detection systems for the high-throughput capillary electrophoresis and high-resolution gel electrophoresis. Out of the 29 newly characterized SSR loci, 26 were considered as polymorphic with a total of 181 alleles obtained. The number of alleles ranged from 2–12, while the polymorphism information content ranged from 0.08–0.83, and the expected and observed heterozygosity were 0.04–0.83 and 0.04–0.82, respectively. The allele pattern of Indian jujube for all SSR loci confirmed its karyotype as tetraploid. Similarity coefficients and UPGMA dendrogram revealed that the Taiwanese cultivars consisted of a large ‘A’ clade, which is further divided into ‘A1’ and ‘A2’ groups, and the ‘B’ clade where both are rooted by the wild accession, ‘Chad native’. These four genetic clusters were supported by the results of PCoA and the assignment test. The excess of heterozygotes based on F-statistics was attributed to its mating system as outcrossing and self-incompatible, and the introgression of the presumed mutation-derived cultivars with genetic admixture. Based on this study, SSR markers offer valuable information on the genetic relationship of this tropical fruit tree which is basically in agreement with the genealogy of its breeding history. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7549064 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75490642020-10-16 The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers Chiou, Chu-Ying Shih, Huei-Chuan Tsai, Chi-Chu Jin, Xiao-Lei Ko, Ya-Zhu Mantiquilla, Junaldo A. Weng, I-Szu Chiang, Yu-Chung Heliyon Research Article The genetic relationships among 24 Indian jujube cultivars (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) were evaluated by genotyping the microsatellite loci using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. The SSR loci were scored by fluorescent labelling and automated detection systems for the high-throughput capillary electrophoresis and high-resolution gel electrophoresis. Out of the 29 newly characterized SSR loci, 26 were considered as polymorphic with a total of 181 alleles obtained. The number of alleles ranged from 2–12, while the polymorphism information content ranged from 0.08–0.83, and the expected and observed heterozygosity were 0.04–0.83 and 0.04–0.82, respectively. The allele pattern of Indian jujube for all SSR loci confirmed its karyotype as tetraploid. Similarity coefficients and UPGMA dendrogram revealed that the Taiwanese cultivars consisted of a large ‘A’ clade, which is further divided into ‘A1’ and ‘A2’ groups, and the ‘B’ clade where both are rooted by the wild accession, ‘Chad native’. These four genetic clusters were supported by the results of PCoA and the assignment test. The excess of heterozygotes based on F-statistics was attributed to its mating system as outcrossing and self-incompatible, and the introgression of the presumed mutation-derived cultivars with genetic admixture. Based on this study, SSR markers offer valuable information on the genetic relationship of this tropical fruit tree which is basically in agreement with the genealogy of its breeding history. Elsevier 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7549064/ /pubmed/33072904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05078 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chiou, Chu-Ying Shih, Huei-Chuan Tsai, Chi-Chu Jin, Xiao-Lei Ko, Ya-Zhu Mantiquilla, Junaldo A. Weng, I-Szu Chiang, Yu-Chung The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers |
title | The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers |
title_full | The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers |
title_fullStr | The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers |
title_full_unstemmed | The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers |
title_short | The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers |
title_sort | genetic relationships of indian jujube (ziziphus mauritiana lam.) cultivars using ssr markers |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chiouchuying thegeneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers AT shihhueichuan thegeneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers AT tsaichichu thegeneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers AT jinxiaolei thegeneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers AT koyazhu thegeneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers AT mantiquillajunaldoa thegeneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers AT wengiszu thegeneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers AT chiangyuchung thegeneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers AT chiouchuying geneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers AT shihhueichuan geneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers AT tsaichichu geneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers AT jinxiaolei geneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers AT koyazhu geneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers AT mantiquillajunaldoa geneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers AT wengiszu geneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers AT chiangyuchung geneticrelationshipsofindianjujubeziziphusmauritianalamcultivarsusingssrmarkers |