Cargando…

Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for patients with tubal occlusion

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies show good technical success rates for fallopian tube recanalization. Scarce literature exists regarding advance techniques currently used by interventional radiologists during fallopian tube recanalization procedures. This study investigates the level of intervention and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jeffrey W., Rustia, Gabriella M., Wood-Molo, Mary, Tasse, Jordan, Tabriz, David, Turba, Ulku C., Arslan, Bulent, Madassery, Sreekumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33103116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633494120954248
_version_ 1783592774710329344
author Wang, Jeffrey W.
Rustia, Gabriella M.
Wood-Molo, Mary
Tasse, Jordan
Tabriz, David
Turba, Ulku C.
Arslan, Bulent
Madassery, Sreekumar
author_facet Wang, Jeffrey W.
Rustia, Gabriella M.
Wood-Molo, Mary
Tasse, Jordan
Tabriz, David
Turba, Ulku C.
Arslan, Bulent
Madassery, Sreekumar
author_sort Wang, Jeffrey W.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Previous studies show good technical success rates for fallopian tube recanalization. Scarce literature exists regarding advance techniques currently used by interventional radiologists during fallopian tube recanalization procedures. This study investigates the level of intervention and tubal patency and its association with technical success and associated pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated fallopian tube recanalization procedures performed at a single center in a 24-year period. A total of 160 couples undergoing a basic infertility evaluation were included. Hysterosalpingography with high pressure contrast injection followed by selective contrast, guidewire catheterization at the tubal ostium, and/or microcatheter/microwire recanalization were performed. Comparisons of the tubal fertilization rate by relevant characteristics were tested for statistical significance with t tests for continuous data or with Pearson chi-square tests for categorical data. RESULTS: Technical success rate was 94% (319 of 341 tubes). High pressure contrast injection alone (184 of 341, 54%), selective catheterization (40%), and microcatheter/microwire (6%) interventions yielded technical success rates of 98%, 90%, and 73%, respectively. The overall rate of conception was 35% (17 of 48). CONCLUSION: Current techniques of fallopian tube recanalization offer a desirable and safe option with high technical success for patients seeking treatment for infertility due to proximal fallopian tube obstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7549323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75493232020-10-22 Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for patients with tubal occlusion Wang, Jeffrey W. Rustia, Gabriella M. Wood-Molo, Mary Tasse, Jordan Tabriz, David Turba, Ulku C. Arslan, Bulent Madassery, Sreekumar Ther Adv Reprod Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: Previous studies show good technical success rates for fallopian tube recanalization. Scarce literature exists regarding advance techniques currently used by interventional radiologists during fallopian tube recanalization procedures. This study investigates the level of intervention and tubal patency and its association with technical success and associated pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated fallopian tube recanalization procedures performed at a single center in a 24-year period. A total of 160 couples undergoing a basic infertility evaluation were included. Hysterosalpingography with high pressure contrast injection followed by selective contrast, guidewire catheterization at the tubal ostium, and/or microcatheter/microwire recanalization were performed. Comparisons of the tubal fertilization rate by relevant characteristics were tested for statistical significance with t tests for continuous data or with Pearson chi-square tests for categorical data. RESULTS: Technical success rate was 94% (319 of 341 tubes). High pressure contrast injection alone (184 of 341, 54%), selective catheterization (40%), and microcatheter/microwire (6%) interventions yielded technical success rates of 98%, 90%, and 73%, respectively. The overall rate of conception was 35% (17 of 48). CONCLUSION: Current techniques of fallopian tube recanalization offer a desirable and safe option with high technical success for patients seeking treatment for infertility due to proximal fallopian tube obstruction. SAGE Publications 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7549323/ /pubmed/33103116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633494120954248 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Wang, Jeffrey W.
Rustia, Gabriella M.
Wood-Molo, Mary
Tasse, Jordan
Tabriz, David
Turba, Ulku C.
Arslan, Bulent
Madassery, Sreekumar
Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for patients with tubal occlusion
title Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for patients with tubal occlusion
title_full Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for patients with tubal occlusion
title_fullStr Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for patients with tubal occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for patients with tubal occlusion
title_short Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for patients with tubal occlusion
title_sort conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for patients with tubal occlusion
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33103116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633494120954248
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjeffreyw conceptionratesafterfluoroscopyguidedfallopiantubalcannulationanalternativetoinvitrofertilizationforpatientswithtubalocclusion
AT rustiagabriellam conceptionratesafterfluoroscopyguidedfallopiantubalcannulationanalternativetoinvitrofertilizationforpatientswithtubalocclusion
AT woodmolomary conceptionratesafterfluoroscopyguidedfallopiantubalcannulationanalternativetoinvitrofertilizationforpatientswithtubalocclusion
AT tassejordan conceptionratesafterfluoroscopyguidedfallopiantubalcannulationanalternativetoinvitrofertilizationforpatientswithtubalocclusion
AT tabrizdavid conceptionratesafterfluoroscopyguidedfallopiantubalcannulationanalternativetoinvitrofertilizationforpatientswithtubalocclusion
AT turbaulkuc conceptionratesafterfluoroscopyguidedfallopiantubalcannulationanalternativetoinvitrofertilizationforpatientswithtubalocclusion
AT arslanbulent conceptionratesafterfluoroscopyguidedfallopiantubalcannulationanalternativetoinvitrofertilizationforpatientswithtubalocclusion
AT madasserysreekumar conceptionratesafterfluoroscopyguidedfallopiantubalcannulationanalternativetoinvitrofertilizationforpatientswithtubalocclusion