Cargando…
Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for patients with tubal occlusion
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies show good technical success rates for fallopian tube recanalization. Scarce literature exists regarding advance techniques currently used by interventional radiologists during fallopian tube recanalization procedures. This study investigates the level of intervention and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33103116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633494120954248 |
_version_ | 1783592774710329344 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Jeffrey W. Rustia, Gabriella M. Wood-Molo, Mary Tasse, Jordan Tabriz, David Turba, Ulku C. Arslan, Bulent Madassery, Sreekumar |
author_facet | Wang, Jeffrey W. Rustia, Gabriella M. Wood-Molo, Mary Tasse, Jordan Tabriz, David Turba, Ulku C. Arslan, Bulent Madassery, Sreekumar |
author_sort | Wang, Jeffrey W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Previous studies show good technical success rates for fallopian tube recanalization. Scarce literature exists regarding advance techniques currently used by interventional radiologists during fallopian tube recanalization procedures. This study investigates the level of intervention and tubal patency and its association with technical success and associated pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated fallopian tube recanalization procedures performed at a single center in a 24-year period. A total of 160 couples undergoing a basic infertility evaluation were included. Hysterosalpingography with high pressure contrast injection followed by selective contrast, guidewire catheterization at the tubal ostium, and/or microcatheter/microwire recanalization were performed. Comparisons of the tubal fertilization rate by relevant characteristics were tested for statistical significance with t tests for continuous data or with Pearson chi-square tests for categorical data. RESULTS: Technical success rate was 94% (319 of 341 tubes). High pressure contrast injection alone (184 of 341, 54%), selective catheterization (40%), and microcatheter/microwire (6%) interventions yielded technical success rates of 98%, 90%, and 73%, respectively. The overall rate of conception was 35% (17 of 48). CONCLUSION: Current techniques of fallopian tube recanalization offer a desirable and safe option with high technical success for patients seeking treatment for infertility due to proximal fallopian tube obstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7549323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75493232020-10-22 Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for patients with tubal occlusion Wang, Jeffrey W. Rustia, Gabriella M. Wood-Molo, Mary Tasse, Jordan Tabriz, David Turba, Ulku C. Arslan, Bulent Madassery, Sreekumar Ther Adv Reprod Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: Previous studies show good technical success rates for fallopian tube recanalization. Scarce literature exists regarding advance techniques currently used by interventional radiologists during fallopian tube recanalization procedures. This study investigates the level of intervention and tubal patency and its association with technical success and associated pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated fallopian tube recanalization procedures performed at a single center in a 24-year period. A total of 160 couples undergoing a basic infertility evaluation were included. Hysterosalpingography with high pressure contrast injection followed by selective contrast, guidewire catheterization at the tubal ostium, and/or microcatheter/microwire recanalization were performed. Comparisons of the tubal fertilization rate by relevant characteristics were tested for statistical significance with t tests for continuous data or with Pearson chi-square tests for categorical data. RESULTS: Technical success rate was 94% (319 of 341 tubes). High pressure contrast injection alone (184 of 341, 54%), selective catheterization (40%), and microcatheter/microwire (6%) interventions yielded technical success rates of 98%, 90%, and 73%, respectively. The overall rate of conception was 35% (17 of 48). CONCLUSION: Current techniques of fallopian tube recanalization offer a desirable and safe option with high technical success for patients seeking treatment for infertility due to proximal fallopian tube obstruction. SAGE Publications 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7549323/ /pubmed/33103116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633494120954248 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Wang, Jeffrey W. Rustia, Gabriella M. Wood-Molo, Mary Tasse, Jordan Tabriz, David Turba, Ulku C. Arslan, Bulent Madassery, Sreekumar Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for patients with tubal occlusion |
title | Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal
cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for
patients with tubal occlusion |
title_full | Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal
cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for
patients with tubal occlusion |
title_fullStr | Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal
cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for
patients with tubal occlusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal
cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for
patients with tubal occlusion |
title_short | Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal
cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for
patients with tubal occlusion |
title_sort | conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal
cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for
patients with tubal occlusion |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33103116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2633494120954248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjeffreyw conceptionratesafterfluoroscopyguidedfallopiantubalcannulationanalternativetoinvitrofertilizationforpatientswithtubalocclusion AT rustiagabriellam conceptionratesafterfluoroscopyguidedfallopiantubalcannulationanalternativetoinvitrofertilizationforpatientswithtubalocclusion AT woodmolomary conceptionratesafterfluoroscopyguidedfallopiantubalcannulationanalternativetoinvitrofertilizationforpatientswithtubalocclusion AT tassejordan conceptionratesafterfluoroscopyguidedfallopiantubalcannulationanalternativetoinvitrofertilizationforpatientswithtubalocclusion AT tabrizdavid conceptionratesafterfluoroscopyguidedfallopiantubalcannulationanalternativetoinvitrofertilizationforpatientswithtubalocclusion AT turbaulkuc conceptionratesafterfluoroscopyguidedfallopiantubalcannulationanalternativetoinvitrofertilizationforpatientswithtubalocclusion AT arslanbulent conceptionratesafterfluoroscopyguidedfallopiantubalcannulationanalternativetoinvitrofertilizationforpatientswithtubalocclusion AT madasserysreekumar conceptionratesafterfluoroscopyguidedfallopiantubalcannulationanalternativetoinvitrofertilizationforpatientswithtubalocclusion |