Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB regimens: study protocol for the TB-PRACTECAL economic evaluation substudy

INTRODUCTION: Current treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) are long, poorly tolerated and have poor outcomes. Furthermore, the costs of treating MDR-TB are much greater than those for treating drug-susceptible TB, both for health service and patient-incurred costs. Urgent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sweeney, Sedona, Gomez, Gabriela, Kitson, Nichola, Sinha, Animesh, Yatskevich, Natalia, Staples, Suzanne, Moodliar, Ronelle, Motlhako, Sharon, Maloma, Matshepo, Rassool, Mohammed, Ngubane, Nosipho, Ndlovu, Ella, Nyang'wa, Bern-Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33039989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036599
_version_ 1783592804386078720
author Sweeney, Sedona
Gomez, Gabriela
Kitson, Nichola
Sinha, Animesh
Yatskevich, Natalia
Staples, Suzanne
Moodliar, Ronelle
Motlhako, Sharon
Maloma, Matshepo
Rassool, Mohammed
Ngubane, Nosipho
Ndlovu, Ella
Nyang'wa, Bern-Thomas
author_facet Sweeney, Sedona
Gomez, Gabriela
Kitson, Nichola
Sinha, Animesh
Yatskevich, Natalia
Staples, Suzanne
Moodliar, Ronelle
Motlhako, Sharon
Maloma, Matshepo
Rassool, Mohammed
Ngubane, Nosipho
Ndlovu, Ella
Nyang'wa, Bern-Thomas
author_sort Sweeney, Sedona
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Current treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) are long, poorly tolerated and have poor outcomes. Furthermore, the costs of treating MDR-TB are much greater than those for treating drug-susceptible TB, both for health service and patient-incurred costs. Urgent action is needed to identify short, effective, tolerable and cheaper treatments for people with both quinolone-susceptible and quinolone-resistant MDR-TB. We present the protocol for an economic evaluation (PRACTECAL-EE substudy) alongside an ongoing clinical trial (TB-PRACTECAL) aiming to assess the costs to patients and providers of new regimens, as well as their cost-effectiveness and impact on participant poverty levels. This substudy is based on data from the three countries participating in the main trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Primary cost data will be collected from the provider and patient perspectives, following economic best practice. We will estimate the probability that new MDR-TB regimens containing bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid are cost-effective from a societal perspective as compared with the standard of care for MDR-TB patients in Uzbekistan, South Africa and Belarus. Analysis uses a Markov model populated with primary cost and outcome data collected at each study site. We will also estimate the impact of new regimens on prevalence of catastrophic patient costs due to TB. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and Médecins Sans Frontières. Local ethical approval will be sought in each study site. The results of the economic evaluation will be shared with the country health authorities and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04207112); Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7549492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75494922020-10-19 Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB regimens: study protocol for the TB-PRACTECAL economic evaluation substudy Sweeney, Sedona Gomez, Gabriela Kitson, Nichola Sinha, Animesh Yatskevich, Natalia Staples, Suzanne Moodliar, Ronelle Motlhako, Sharon Maloma, Matshepo Rassool, Mohammed Ngubane, Nosipho Ndlovu, Ella Nyang'wa, Bern-Thomas BMJ Open Health Economics INTRODUCTION: Current treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) are long, poorly tolerated and have poor outcomes. Furthermore, the costs of treating MDR-TB are much greater than those for treating drug-susceptible TB, both for health service and patient-incurred costs. Urgent action is needed to identify short, effective, tolerable and cheaper treatments for people with both quinolone-susceptible and quinolone-resistant MDR-TB. We present the protocol for an economic evaluation (PRACTECAL-EE substudy) alongside an ongoing clinical trial (TB-PRACTECAL) aiming to assess the costs to patients and providers of new regimens, as well as their cost-effectiveness and impact on participant poverty levels. This substudy is based on data from the three countries participating in the main trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Primary cost data will be collected from the provider and patient perspectives, following economic best practice. We will estimate the probability that new MDR-TB regimens containing bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid are cost-effective from a societal perspective as compared with the standard of care for MDR-TB patients in Uzbekistan, South Africa and Belarus. Analysis uses a Markov model populated with primary cost and outcome data collected at each study site. We will also estimate the impact of new regimens on prevalence of catastrophic patient costs due to TB. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and Médecins Sans Frontières. Local ethical approval will be sought in each study site. The results of the economic evaluation will be shared with the country health authorities and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04207112); Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7549492/ /pubmed/33039989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036599 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Sweeney, Sedona
Gomez, Gabriela
Kitson, Nichola
Sinha, Animesh
Yatskevich, Natalia
Staples, Suzanne
Moodliar, Ronelle
Motlhako, Sharon
Maloma, Matshepo
Rassool, Mohammed
Ngubane, Nosipho
Ndlovu, Ella
Nyang'wa, Bern-Thomas
Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB regimens: study protocol for the TB-PRACTECAL economic evaluation substudy
title Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB regimens: study protocol for the TB-PRACTECAL economic evaluation substudy
title_full Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB regimens: study protocol for the TB-PRACTECAL economic evaluation substudy
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB regimens: study protocol for the TB-PRACTECAL economic evaluation substudy
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB regimens: study protocol for the TB-PRACTECAL economic evaluation substudy
title_short Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB regimens: study protocol for the TB-PRACTECAL economic evaluation substudy
title_sort cost-effectiveness of new mdr-tb regimens: study protocol for the tb-practecal economic evaluation substudy
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33039989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036599
work_keys_str_mv AT sweeneysedona costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy
AT gomezgabriela costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy
AT kitsonnichola costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy
AT sinhaanimesh costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy
AT yatskevichnatalia costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy
AT staplessuzanne costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy
AT moodliarronelle costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy
AT motlhakosharon costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy
AT malomamatshepo costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy
AT rassoolmohammed costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy
AT ngubanenosipho costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy
AT ndlovuella costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy
AT nyangwabernthomas costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy