Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB regimens: study protocol for the TB-PRACTECAL economic evaluation substudy
INTRODUCTION: Current treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) are long, poorly tolerated and have poor outcomes. Furthermore, the costs of treating MDR-TB are much greater than those for treating drug-susceptible TB, both for health service and patient-incurred costs. Urgent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33039989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036599 |
_version_ | 1783592804386078720 |
---|---|
author | Sweeney, Sedona Gomez, Gabriela Kitson, Nichola Sinha, Animesh Yatskevich, Natalia Staples, Suzanne Moodliar, Ronelle Motlhako, Sharon Maloma, Matshepo Rassool, Mohammed Ngubane, Nosipho Ndlovu, Ella Nyang'wa, Bern-Thomas |
author_facet | Sweeney, Sedona Gomez, Gabriela Kitson, Nichola Sinha, Animesh Yatskevich, Natalia Staples, Suzanne Moodliar, Ronelle Motlhako, Sharon Maloma, Matshepo Rassool, Mohammed Ngubane, Nosipho Ndlovu, Ella Nyang'wa, Bern-Thomas |
author_sort | Sweeney, Sedona |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Current treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) are long, poorly tolerated and have poor outcomes. Furthermore, the costs of treating MDR-TB are much greater than those for treating drug-susceptible TB, both for health service and patient-incurred costs. Urgent action is needed to identify short, effective, tolerable and cheaper treatments for people with both quinolone-susceptible and quinolone-resistant MDR-TB. We present the protocol for an economic evaluation (PRACTECAL-EE substudy) alongside an ongoing clinical trial (TB-PRACTECAL) aiming to assess the costs to patients and providers of new regimens, as well as their cost-effectiveness and impact on participant poverty levels. This substudy is based on data from the three countries participating in the main trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Primary cost data will be collected from the provider and patient perspectives, following economic best practice. We will estimate the probability that new MDR-TB regimens containing bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid are cost-effective from a societal perspective as compared with the standard of care for MDR-TB patients in Uzbekistan, South Africa and Belarus. Analysis uses a Markov model populated with primary cost and outcome data collected at each study site. We will also estimate the impact of new regimens on prevalence of catastrophic patient costs due to TB. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and Médecins Sans Frontières. Local ethical approval will be sought in each study site. The results of the economic evaluation will be shared with the country health authorities and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04207112); Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7549492 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75494922020-10-19 Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB regimens: study protocol for the TB-PRACTECAL economic evaluation substudy Sweeney, Sedona Gomez, Gabriela Kitson, Nichola Sinha, Animesh Yatskevich, Natalia Staples, Suzanne Moodliar, Ronelle Motlhako, Sharon Maloma, Matshepo Rassool, Mohammed Ngubane, Nosipho Ndlovu, Ella Nyang'wa, Bern-Thomas BMJ Open Health Economics INTRODUCTION: Current treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) are long, poorly tolerated and have poor outcomes. Furthermore, the costs of treating MDR-TB are much greater than those for treating drug-susceptible TB, both for health service and patient-incurred costs. Urgent action is needed to identify short, effective, tolerable and cheaper treatments for people with both quinolone-susceptible and quinolone-resistant MDR-TB. We present the protocol for an economic evaluation (PRACTECAL-EE substudy) alongside an ongoing clinical trial (TB-PRACTECAL) aiming to assess the costs to patients and providers of new regimens, as well as their cost-effectiveness and impact on participant poverty levels. This substudy is based on data from the three countries participating in the main trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Primary cost data will be collected from the provider and patient perspectives, following economic best practice. We will estimate the probability that new MDR-TB regimens containing bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid are cost-effective from a societal perspective as compared with the standard of care for MDR-TB patients in Uzbekistan, South Africa and Belarus. Analysis uses a Markov model populated with primary cost and outcome data collected at each study site. We will also estimate the impact of new regimens on prevalence of catastrophic patient costs due to TB. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and Médecins Sans Frontières. Local ethical approval will be sought in each study site. The results of the economic evaluation will be shared with the country health authorities and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04207112); Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7549492/ /pubmed/33039989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036599 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Sweeney, Sedona Gomez, Gabriela Kitson, Nichola Sinha, Animesh Yatskevich, Natalia Staples, Suzanne Moodliar, Ronelle Motlhako, Sharon Maloma, Matshepo Rassool, Mohammed Ngubane, Nosipho Ndlovu, Ella Nyang'wa, Bern-Thomas Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB regimens: study protocol for the TB-PRACTECAL economic evaluation substudy |
title | Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB regimens: study protocol for the TB-PRACTECAL economic evaluation substudy |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB regimens: study protocol for the TB-PRACTECAL economic evaluation substudy |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB regimens: study protocol for the TB-PRACTECAL economic evaluation substudy |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB regimens: study protocol for the TB-PRACTECAL economic evaluation substudy |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of new MDR-TB regimens: study protocol for the TB-PRACTECAL economic evaluation substudy |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of new mdr-tb regimens: study protocol for the tb-practecal economic evaluation substudy |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33039989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036599 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sweeneysedona costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy AT gomezgabriela costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy AT kitsonnichola costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy AT sinhaanimesh costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy AT yatskevichnatalia costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy AT staplessuzanne costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy AT moodliarronelle costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy AT motlhakosharon costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy AT malomamatshepo costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy AT rassoolmohammed costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy AT ngubanenosipho costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy AT ndlovuella costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy AT nyangwabernthomas costeffectivenessofnewmdrtbregimensstudyprotocolforthetbpractecaleconomicevaluationsubstudy |