Cargando…

Differences in Intersubject Early Readiness Potentials Between Voluntary and Instructed Actions

Readiness potential (RP) is a slow negative electroencephalogram (EEG) potential prior to voluntary action and was first described by Kornhuber and Deecke (1965). Recent studies have demonstrated that a few subjects do not exhibit standard RP before voluntary action. In our previous study, we also f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Lipeng, Zhang, Rui, Yao, Dezhong, Shi, Li, Gao, Jinfeng, Hu, Yuxia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33117215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.529821
_version_ 1783592832829751296
author Zhang, Lipeng
Zhang, Rui
Yao, Dezhong
Shi, Li
Gao, Jinfeng
Hu, Yuxia
author_facet Zhang, Lipeng
Zhang, Rui
Yao, Dezhong
Shi, Li
Gao, Jinfeng
Hu, Yuxia
author_sort Zhang, Lipeng
collection PubMed
description Readiness potential (RP) is a slow negative electroencephalogram (EEG) potential prior to voluntary action and was first described by Kornhuber and Deecke (1965). Recent studies have demonstrated that a few subjects do not exhibit standard RP before voluntary action. In our previous study, we also found that some subjects did not show an early RP preceding instructed action. Although this phenomenon may be meaningful, no studies have yet investigated its origins. In the present study, we designed and implemented an experimental paradigm involving voluntary and instructed actions in the form of hand movements from 29 subjects with concurrent acquisition of EEGs. According to whether the subjects showed a standard RP waveform during instructed action, they were divided into the SHOW and NOSHOW group. Then, the RPs and voltage topographies were plotted for each group. Finally, the slope of each epoch at the early RP phase was estimated. We showed that early RPs were absent in 14 of 29 subjects during instructed actions. Besides, based on the slow cortical potential (SCP) sampling hypothesis, we also showed a decreased proportion in the negative potential for the NOSHOW group. Our results suggested that early RP is absent among approximately half of subjects during instructed action and that the decreased proportion of negative potential shifts may account for the absence of early RP in the NOSHOW group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7549661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75496612020-10-27 Differences in Intersubject Early Readiness Potentials Between Voluntary and Instructed Actions Zhang, Lipeng Zhang, Rui Yao, Dezhong Shi, Li Gao, Jinfeng Hu, Yuxia Front Psychol Psychology Readiness potential (RP) is a slow negative electroencephalogram (EEG) potential prior to voluntary action and was first described by Kornhuber and Deecke (1965). Recent studies have demonstrated that a few subjects do not exhibit standard RP before voluntary action. In our previous study, we also found that some subjects did not show an early RP preceding instructed action. Although this phenomenon may be meaningful, no studies have yet investigated its origins. In the present study, we designed and implemented an experimental paradigm involving voluntary and instructed actions in the form of hand movements from 29 subjects with concurrent acquisition of EEGs. According to whether the subjects showed a standard RP waveform during instructed action, they were divided into the SHOW and NOSHOW group. Then, the RPs and voltage topographies were plotted for each group. Finally, the slope of each epoch at the early RP phase was estimated. We showed that early RPs were absent in 14 of 29 subjects during instructed actions. Besides, based on the slow cortical potential (SCP) sampling hypothesis, we also showed a decreased proportion in the negative potential for the NOSHOW group. Our results suggested that early RP is absent among approximately half of subjects during instructed action and that the decreased proportion of negative potential shifts may account for the absence of early RP in the NOSHOW group. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7549661/ /pubmed/33117215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.529821 Text en Copyright © 2020 Zhang, Zhang, Yao, Shi, Gao and Hu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Zhang, Lipeng
Zhang, Rui
Yao, Dezhong
Shi, Li
Gao, Jinfeng
Hu, Yuxia
Differences in Intersubject Early Readiness Potentials Between Voluntary and Instructed Actions
title Differences in Intersubject Early Readiness Potentials Between Voluntary and Instructed Actions
title_full Differences in Intersubject Early Readiness Potentials Between Voluntary and Instructed Actions
title_fullStr Differences in Intersubject Early Readiness Potentials Between Voluntary and Instructed Actions
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Intersubject Early Readiness Potentials Between Voluntary and Instructed Actions
title_short Differences in Intersubject Early Readiness Potentials Between Voluntary and Instructed Actions
title_sort differences in intersubject early readiness potentials between voluntary and instructed actions
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33117215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.529821
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanglipeng differencesinintersubjectearlyreadinesspotentialsbetweenvoluntaryandinstructedactions
AT zhangrui differencesinintersubjectearlyreadinesspotentialsbetweenvoluntaryandinstructedactions
AT yaodezhong differencesinintersubjectearlyreadinesspotentialsbetweenvoluntaryandinstructedactions
AT shili differencesinintersubjectearlyreadinesspotentialsbetweenvoluntaryandinstructedactions
AT gaojinfeng differencesinintersubjectearlyreadinesspotentialsbetweenvoluntaryandinstructedactions
AT huyuxia differencesinintersubjectearlyreadinesspotentialsbetweenvoluntaryandinstructedactions