Cargando…
Differences in Intersubject Early Readiness Potentials Between Voluntary and Instructed Actions
Readiness potential (RP) is a slow negative electroencephalogram (EEG) potential prior to voluntary action and was first described by Kornhuber and Deecke (1965). Recent studies have demonstrated that a few subjects do not exhibit standard RP before voluntary action. In our previous study, we also f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33117215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.529821 |
_version_ | 1783592832829751296 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Lipeng Zhang, Rui Yao, Dezhong Shi, Li Gao, Jinfeng Hu, Yuxia |
author_facet | Zhang, Lipeng Zhang, Rui Yao, Dezhong Shi, Li Gao, Jinfeng Hu, Yuxia |
author_sort | Zhang, Lipeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Readiness potential (RP) is a slow negative electroencephalogram (EEG) potential prior to voluntary action and was first described by Kornhuber and Deecke (1965). Recent studies have demonstrated that a few subjects do not exhibit standard RP before voluntary action. In our previous study, we also found that some subjects did not show an early RP preceding instructed action. Although this phenomenon may be meaningful, no studies have yet investigated its origins. In the present study, we designed and implemented an experimental paradigm involving voluntary and instructed actions in the form of hand movements from 29 subjects with concurrent acquisition of EEGs. According to whether the subjects showed a standard RP waveform during instructed action, they were divided into the SHOW and NOSHOW group. Then, the RPs and voltage topographies were plotted for each group. Finally, the slope of each epoch at the early RP phase was estimated. We showed that early RPs were absent in 14 of 29 subjects during instructed actions. Besides, based on the slow cortical potential (SCP) sampling hypothesis, we also showed a decreased proportion in the negative potential for the NOSHOW group. Our results suggested that early RP is absent among approximately half of subjects during instructed action and that the decreased proportion of negative potential shifts may account for the absence of early RP in the NOSHOW group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7549661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75496612020-10-27 Differences in Intersubject Early Readiness Potentials Between Voluntary and Instructed Actions Zhang, Lipeng Zhang, Rui Yao, Dezhong Shi, Li Gao, Jinfeng Hu, Yuxia Front Psychol Psychology Readiness potential (RP) is a slow negative electroencephalogram (EEG) potential prior to voluntary action and was first described by Kornhuber and Deecke (1965). Recent studies have demonstrated that a few subjects do not exhibit standard RP before voluntary action. In our previous study, we also found that some subjects did not show an early RP preceding instructed action. Although this phenomenon may be meaningful, no studies have yet investigated its origins. In the present study, we designed and implemented an experimental paradigm involving voluntary and instructed actions in the form of hand movements from 29 subjects with concurrent acquisition of EEGs. According to whether the subjects showed a standard RP waveform during instructed action, they were divided into the SHOW and NOSHOW group. Then, the RPs and voltage topographies were plotted for each group. Finally, the slope of each epoch at the early RP phase was estimated. We showed that early RPs were absent in 14 of 29 subjects during instructed actions. Besides, based on the slow cortical potential (SCP) sampling hypothesis, we also showed a decreased proportion in the negative potential for the NOSHOW group. Our results suggested that early RP is absent among approximately half of subjects during instructed action and that the decreased proportion of negative potential shifts may account for the absence of early RP in the NOSHOW group. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7549661/ /pubmed/33117215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.529821 Text en Copyright © 2020 Zhang, Zhang, Yao, Shi, Gao and Hu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Zhang, Lipeng Zhang, Rui Yao, Dezhong Shi, Li Gao, Jinfeng Hu, Yuxia Differences in Intersubject Early Readiness Potentials Between Voluntary and Instructed Actions |
title | Differences in Intersubject Early Readiness Potentials Between Voluntary and Instructed Actions |
title_full | Differences in Intersubject Early Readiness Potentials Between Voluntary and Instructed Actions |
title_fullStr | Differences in Intersubject Early Readiness Potentials Between Voluntary and Instructed Actions |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Intersubject Early Readiness Potentials Between Voluntary and Instructed Actions |
title_short | Differences in Intersubject Early Readiness Potentials Between Voluntary and Instructed Actions |
title_sort | differences in intersubject early readiness potentials between voluntary and instructed actions |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33117215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.529821 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanglipeng differencesinintersubjectearlyreadinesspotentialsbetweenvoluntaryandinstructedactions AT zhangrui differencesinintersubjectearlyreadinesspotentialsbetweenvoluntaryandinstructedactions AT yaodezhong differencesinintersubjectearlyreadinesspotentialsbetweenvoluntaryandinstructedactions AT shili differencesinintersubjectearlyreadinesspotentialsbetweenvoluntaryandinstructedactions AT gaojinfeng differencesinintersubjectearlyreadinesspotentialsbetweenvoluntaryandinstructedactions AT huyuxia differencesinintersubjectearlyreadinesspotentialsbetweenvoluntaryandinstructedactions |