Cargando…
Conservative Composite Resin Restoration for Proximal Caries – Two Case Reports
The paradigms of contemporary caries management have shifted to minimal intervention dentistry. Conservative restorative procedures are recommended to replace the complete removal of all carious tissues in the management of dental caries. This article reports two clinical cases of conservative resto...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33116910 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S270453 |
_version_ | 1783592839200899072 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Ollie Yiru Zaeneldin, Ahmed Mohamed Hamama, Hamdi Hosni Hamda Mei, May Lei Patel, Neil Chu, Chun-Hung |
author_facet | Yu, Ollie Yiru Zaeneldin, Ahmed Mohamed Hamama, Hamdi Hosni Hamda Mei, May Lei Patel, Neil Chu, Chun-Hung |
author_sort | Yu, Ollie Yiru |
collection | PubMed |
description | The paradigms of contemporary caries management have shifted to minimal intervention dentistry. Conservative restorative procedures are recommended to replace the complete removal of all carious tissues in the management of dental caries. This article reports two clinical cases of conservative restorations of proximal caries. Different conservative cavity designs and restorative techniques were performed in the two cases. Proximal caries in posterior teeth were prepared using the box-only preparation technique or the proximal tunnel preparation technique. The cavities were restored directly with resin composites. The advantages of using the box-only preparation with fissure sealant included the maximum conservation of tooth hard tissues and the prevention of unnecessary tissue removal in the occlusal surface. The tunnel preparation preserved the marginal ridge and protected the restored tooth from fracture. The filling of composites into the tunnel demonstrated a better marginal adaptation than other restorative materials. These two techniques allowed for the preservation of more healthy dental hard tissue compared with traditional techniques. Potential problems in the restoration included the high incidence of the inappropriate removal of dental hard tissue, damage of the vital pulp and the microleakage due to the polymerization shrinkage. The solutions to minimize the risk of these problems in the operative procedures were discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7549752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75497522020-10-27 Conservative Composite Resin Restoration for Proximal Caries – Two Case Reports Yu, Ollie Yiru Zaeneldin, Ahmed Mohamed Hamama, Hamdi Hosni Hamda Mei, May Lei Patel, Neil Chu, Chun-Hung Clin Cosmet Investig Dent Case Series The paradigms of contemporary caries management have shifted to minimal intervention dentistry. Conservative restorative procedures are recommended to replace the complete removal of all carious tissues in the management of dental caries. This article reports two clinical cases of conservative restorations of proximal caries. Different conservative cavity designs and restorative techniques were performed in the two cases. Proximal caries in posterior teeth were prepared using the box-only preparation technique or the proximal tunnel preparation technique. The cavities were restored directly with resin composites. The advantages of using the box-only preparation with fissure sealant included the maximum conservation of tooth hard tissues and the prevention of unnecessary tissue removal in the occlusal surface. The tunnel preparation preserved the marginal ridge and protected the restored tooth from fracture. The filling of composites into the tunnel demonstrated a better marginal adaptation than other restorative materials. These two techniques allowed for the preservation of more healthy dental hard tissue compared with traditional techniques. Potential problems in the restoration included the high incidence of the inappropriate removal of dental hard tissue, damage of the vital pulp and the microleakage due to the polymerization shrinkage. The solutions to minimize the risk of these problems in the operative procedures were discussed. Dove 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7549752/ /pubmed/33116910 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S270453 Text en © 2020 Yu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Case Series Yu, Ollie Yiru Zaeneldin, Ahmed Mohamed Hamama, Hamdi Hosni Hamda Mei, May Lei Patel, Neil Chu, Chun-Hung Conservative Composite Resin Restoration for Proximal Caries – Two Case Reports |
title | Conservative Composite Resin Restoration for Proximal Caries – Two Case Reports |
title_full | Conservative Composite Resin Restoration for Proximal Caries – Two Case Reports |
title_fullStr | Conservative Composite Resin Restoration for Proximal Caries – Two Case Reports |
title_full_unstemmed | Conservative Composite Resin Restoration for Proximal Caries – Two Case Reports |
title_short | Conservative Composite Resin Restoration for Proximal Caries – Two Case Reports |
title_sort | conservative composite resin restoration for proximal caries – two case reports |
topic | Case Series |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7549752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33116910 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S270453 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuollieyiru conservativecompositeresinrestorationforproximalcariestwocasereports AT zaeneldinahmedmohamed conservativecompositeresinrestorationforproximalcariestwocasereports AT hamamahamdihosnihamda conservativecompositeresinrestorationforproximalcariestwocasereports AT meimaylei conservativecompositeresinrestorationforproximalcariestwocasereports AT patelneil conservativecompositeresinrestorationforproximalcariestwocasereports AT chuchunhung conservativecompositeresinrestorationforproximalcariestwocasereports |