Cargando…

Effects of Intraoperative Ventilation Strategy on Perioperative Atelectasis Assessed by Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND: Protective mechanical ventilation using low tidal volume has been introduced to surgical patients to reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. We investigated the effects of protective ventilation (PV) techniques on anesthesia-induced atelectasis identified via lung...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Sooyoung, Oh, Hye-Won, Choi, Min Hee, Lee, Hyun Jung, Woo, Jae Hee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7550238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33045769
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e327
_version_ 1783592932948836352
author Cho, Sooyoung
Oh, Hye-Won
Choi, Min Hee
Lee, Hyun Jung
Woo, Jae Hee
author_facet Cho, Sooyoung
Oh, Hye-Won
Choi, Min Hee
Lee, Hyun Jung
Woo, Jae Hee
author_sort Cho, Sooyoung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Protective mechanical ventilation using low tidal volume has been introduced to surgical patients to reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. We investigated the effects of protective ventilation (PV) techniques on anesthesia-induced atelectasis identified via lung ultrasonography in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. METHODS: A total of 42 adult patients who were scheduled for open abdominal surgery with an expected duration > 2 hours were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive either conventional ventilation (CV; tidal volume of 9–10 mL/kg predicted body weight [PBW] with no positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP]) or PV (tidal volume of 6–8 mL/kg PBW and 5 cmH(2)O PEEP) via pressure-controlled ventilation with volume guaranteed. Lung ultrasonography was performed at four predefined time points to assess perioperative atelectasis by dividing each hemithorax into six quadrants based on a modified lung ultrasound (LUS) scoring system. RESULTS: The tidal volume delivered to patients was 9.65 ± 1.65 mL/kg PBW in the CV group and 6.31 ± 0.62 mL/kg PBW in the PV group. Ventilation using low tidal volume led to similar LUS scores in all lung areas and at all time points compared to ventilation using high tidal volume. There was no significant difference between the groups in the number of patients requiring recruitment maneuvers at the end of surgery. CONCLUSION: Ventilation with low tidal volume combined with 5 cmH(2)O PEEP did not cause further loss of aeration compared to ventilation with high tidal volume. Low tidal volume ventilation can be used in patients without lung injury based on lung assessment by bedside lung ultrasonography. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0003746
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7550238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75502382020-10-20 Effects of Intraoperative Ventilation Strategy on Perioperative Atelectasis Assessed by Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Cho, Sooyoung Oh, Hye-Won Choi, Min Hee Lee, Hyun Jung Woo, Jae Hee J Korean Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Protective mechanical ventilation using low tidal volume has been introduced to surgical patients to reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. We investigated the effects of protective ventilation (PV) techniques on anesthesia-induced atelectasis identified via lung ultrasonography in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. METHODS: A total of 42 adult patients who were scheduled for open abdominal surgery with an expected duration > 2 hours were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive either conventional ventilation (CV; tidal volume of 9–10 mL/kg predicted body weight [PBW] with no positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP]) or PV (tidal volume of 6–8 mL/kg PBW and 5 cmH(2)O PEEP) via pressure-controlled ventilation with volume guaranteed. Lung ultrasonography was performed at four predefined time points to assess perioperative atelectasis by dividing each hemithorax into six quadrants based on a modified lung ultrasound (LUS) scoring system. RESULTS: The tidal volume delivered to patients was 9.65 ± 1.65 mL/kg PBW in the CV group and 6.31 ± 0.62 mL/kg PBW in the PV group. Ventilation using low tidal volume led to similar LUS scores in all lung areas and at all time points compared to ventilation using high tidal volume. There was no significant difference between the groups in the number of patients requiring recruitment maneuvers at the end of surgery. CONCLUSION: Ventilation with low tidal volume combined with 5 cmH(2)O PEEP did not cause further loss of aeration compared to ventilation with high tidal volume. Low tidal volume ventilation can be used in patients without lung injury based on lung assessment by bedside lung ultrasonography. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0003746 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7550238/ /pubmed/33045769 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e327 Text en © 2020 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cho, Sooyoung
Oh, Hye-Won
Choi, Min Hee
Lee, Hyun Jung
Woo, Jae Hee
Effects of Intraoperative Ventilation Strategy on Perioperative Atelectasis Assessed by Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
title Effects of Intraoperative Ventilation Strategy on Perioperative Atelectasis Assessed by Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
title_full Effects of Intraoperative Ventilation Strategy on Perioperative Atelectasis Assessed by Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
title_fullStr Effects of Intraoperative Ventilation Strategy on Perioperative Atelectasis Assessed by Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Intraoperative Ventilation Strategy on Perioperative Atelectasis Assessed by Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
title_short Effects of Intraoperative Ventilation Strategy on Perioperative Atelectasis Assessed by Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
title_sort effects of intraoperative ventilation strategy on perioperative atelectasis assessed by lung ultrasonography in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7550238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33045769
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e327
work_keys_str_mv AT chosooyoung effectsofintraoperativeventilationstrategyonperioperativeatelectasisassessedbylungultrasonographyinpatientsundergoingopenabdominalsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT ohhyewon effectsofintraoperativeventilationstrategyonperioperativeatelectasisassessedbylungultrasonographyinpatientsundergoingopenabdominalsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT choiminhee effectsofintraoperativeventilationstrategyonperioperativeatelectasisassessedbylungultrasonographyinpatientsundergoingopenabdominalsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT leehyunjung effectsofintraoperativeventilationstrategyonperioperativeatelectasisassessedbylungultrasonographyinpatientsundergoingopenabdominalsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT woojaehee effectsofintraoperativeventilationstrategyonperioperativeatelectasisassessedbylungultrasonographyinpatientsundergoingopenabdominalsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy