Cargando…

Early unplanned readmission of neurosurgical patients after treatment of intracranial lesions: a comparison between surgical and non-surgical intervention group

BACKGROUND: Recent health care policy making has highlighted the necessity for understanding factors that influence readmission. To elucidate the rate, reason, and predictors of readmissions in neurosurgical patients, we analyzed unscheduled readmissions to our neurosurgical department after treatme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sander, Caroline, Oppermann, Henry, Nestler, Ulf, Sander, Katharina, von Dercks, Nikolaus, Meixensberger, Jürgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7550291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32803369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04521-4
_version_ 1783592944188522496
author Sander, Caroline
Oppermann, Henry
Nestler, Ulf
Sander, Katharina
von Dercks, Nikolaus
Meixensberger, Jürgen
author_facet Sander, Caroline
Oppermann, Henry
Nestler, Ulf
Sander, Katharina
von Dercks, Nikolaus
Meixensberger, Jürgen
author_sort Sander, Caroline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent health care policy making has highlighted the necessity for understanding factors that influence readmission. To elucidate the rate, reason, and predictors of readmissions in neurosurgical patients, we analyzed unscheduled readmissions to our neurosurgical department after treatment for cranial or cerebral lesions. METHODS: From 2015 to 2017, all adult patients who had been discharged from our Department of Neurosurgery and were readmitted within 30 days were included into the study cohort. The patients were divided into a surgical and a non-surgical group. The main outcome measure was unplanned inpatient admission within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: During the observation period, 183 (7.4%) of 2486 patients had to be readmitted unexpectedly within 30 days after discharge. The main readmission causes were surgical site infection (34.4 %) and seizure (16.4%) in the surgical group, compared to natural progression of the original diagnosis (38.2%) in the non-surgical group. Most important predictors for an unplanned readmission were younger age, presence of malignoma (OR: 2.44), and presence of cardiovascular side diagnoses in the surgical group. In the non-surgical group, predictors were length of stay (OR: 1.07) and the need for intensive care (OR: 5.79). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that reasons for readmission vary between operated and non-operated patients and are preventable in large numbers. In addition, we identified treatment-related partly modifiable factors as predictors of unplanned readmission in the non-surgical group, while unmodifiable patient-related factors predominated in the surgical group. Further patient-related risk adjustment models are needed to establish an individualized preventive strategy in order to reduce unplanned readmissions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-020-04521-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7550291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75502912020-10-19 Early unplanned readmission of neurosurgical patients after treatment of intracranial lesions: a comparison between surgical and non-surgical intervention group Sander, Caroline Oppermann, Henry Nestler, Ulf Sander, Katharina von Dercks, Nikolaus Meixensberger, Jürgen Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - Neurosurgery general BACKGROUND: Recent health care policy making has highlighted the necessity for understanding factors that influence readmission. To elucidate the rate, reason, and predictors of readmissions in neurosurgical patients, we analyzed unscheduled readmissions to our neurosurgical department after treatment for cranial or cerebral lesions. METHODS: From 2015 to 2017, all adult patients who had been discharged from our Department of Neurosurgery and were readmitted within 30 days were included into the study cohort. The patients were divided into a surgical and a non-surgical group. The main outcome measure was unplanned inpatient admission within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: During the observation period, 183 (7.4%) of 2486 patients had to be readmitted unexpectedly within 30 days after discharge. The main readmission causes were surgical site infection (34.4 %) and seizure (16.4%) in the surgical group, compared to natural progression of the original diagnosis (38.2%) in the non-surgical group. Most important predictors for an unplanned readmission were younger age, presence of malignoma (OR: 2.44), and presence of cardiovascular side diagnoses in the surgical group. In the non-surgical group, predictors were length of stay (OR: 1.07) and the need for intensive care (OR: 5.79). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that reasons for readmission vary between operated and non-operated patients and are preventable in large numbers. In addition, we identified treatment-related partly modifiable factors as predictors of unplanned readmission in the non-surgical group, while unmodifiable patient-related factors predominated in the surgical group. Further patient-related risk adjustment models are needed to establish an individualized preventive strategy in order to reduce unplanned readmissions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-020-04521-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Vienna 2020-08-15 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7550291/ /pubmed/32803369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04521-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article - Neurosurgery general
Sander, Caroline
Oppermann, Henry
Nestler, Ulf
Sander, Katharina
von Dercks, Nikolaus
Meixensberger, Jürgen
Early unplanned readmission of neurosurgical patients after treatment of intracranial lesions: a comparison between surgical and non-surgical intervention group
title Early unplanned readmission of neurosurgical patients after treatment of intracranial lesions: a comparison between surgical and non-surgical intervention group
title_full Early unplanned readmission of neurosurgical patients after treatment of intracranial lesions: a comparison between surgical and non-surgical intervention group
title_fullStr Early unplanned readmission of neurosurgical patients after treatment of intracranial lesions: a comparison between surgical and non-surgical intervention group
title_full_unstemmed Early unplanned readmission of neurosurgical patients after treatment of intracranial lesions: a comparison between surgical and non-surgical intervention group
title_short Early unplanned readmission of neurosurgical patients after treatment of intracranial lesions: a comparison between surgical and non-surgical intervention group
title_sort early unplanned readmission of neurosurgical patients after treatment of intracranial lesions: a comparison between surgical and non-surgical intervention group
topic Original Article - Neurosurgery general
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7550291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32803369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04521-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sandercaroline earlyunplannedreadmissionofneurosurgicalpatientsaftertreatmentofintracraniallesionsacomparisonbetweensurgicalandnonsurgicalinterventiongroup
AT oppermannhenry earlyunplannedreadmissionofneurosurgicalpatientsaftertreatmentofintracraniallesionsacomparisonbetweensurgicalandnonsurgicalinterventiongroup
AT nestlerulf earlyunplannedreadmissionofneurosurgicalpatientsaftertreatmentofintracraniallesionsacomparisonbetweensurgicalandnonsurgicalinterventiongroup
AT sanderkatharina earlyunplannedreadmissionofneurosurgicalpatientsaftertreatmentofintracraniallesionsacomparisonbetweensurgicalandnonsurgicalinterventiongroup
AT vondercksnikolaus earlyunplannedreadmissionofneurosurgicalpatientsaftertreatmentofintracraniallesionsacomparisonbetweensurgicalandnonsurgicalinterventiongroup
AT meixensbergerjurgen earlyunplannedreadmissionofneurosurgicalpatientsaftertreatmentofintracraniallesionsacomparisonbetweensurgicalandnonsurgicalinterventiongroup