Cargando…
Elements of Regulatory Dissonance: Examining FDA and EMA Product Labeling of New Vaccines (2006–2018)
With the ongoing globalization of the pharmaceutical industry, efforts to harmonize technical requirements of registering drugs and biologics, including vaccines, have produced a number of useful guidelines utilized around the world. However, such efforts have not been extended to the regulatory rev...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7550305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33059971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.067 |
_version_ | 1783592947485245440 |
---|---|
author | Seo, Yurim Pacifici, Eunjoo |
author_facet | Seo, Yurim Pacifici, Eunjoo |
author_sort | Seo, Yurim |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the ongoing globalization of the pharmaceutical industry, efforts to harmonize technical requirements of registering drugs and biologics, including vaccines, have produced a number of useful guidelines utilized around the world. However, such efforts have not been extended to the regulatory review process or product labeling. Prescribing information and patient information leaflet are two types of such product labeling documents. This study examined the differences in the languages of these documents between the United States (US) and European Union (EU). The key documents examined were the U.S. Food & Drug Administration’s (FDA) Package Inserts (PIs), U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Information Statements (VISs), and the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPCs) and Package Leaflets (PLs). Prescribing information and patient information leaflet languages were subsequently organized into ten and seven categories, respectively. Comparison of FDA PIs to EMA SmPCs showed little harmonization between the two regions, and CDC VISs to EMA PLs revealed even less. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7550305 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75503052020-10-13 Elements of Regulatory Dissonance: Examining FDA and EMA Product Labeling of New Vaccines (2006–2018) Seo, Yurim Pacifici, Eunjoo Vaccine Article With the ongoing globalization of the pharmaceutical industry, efforts to harmonize technical requirements of registering drugs and biologics, including vaccines, have produced a number of useful guidelines utilized around the world. However, such efforts have not been extended to the regulatory review process or product labeling. Prescribing information and patient information leaflet are two types of such product labeling documents. This study examined the differences in the languages of these documents between the United States (US) and European Union (EU). The key documents examined were the U.S. Food & Drug Administration’s (FDA) Package Inserts (PIs), U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Information Statements (VISs), and the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPCs) and Package Leaflets (PLs). Prescribing information and patient information leaflet languages were subsequently organized into ten and seven categories, respectively. Comparison of FDA PIs to EMA SmPCs showed little harmonization between the two regions, and CDC VISs to EMA PLs revealed even less. Elsevier Ltd. 2020-11-03 2020-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7550305/ /pubmed/33059971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.067 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Seo, Yurim Pacifici, Eunjoo Elements of Regulatory Dissonance: Examining FDA and EMA Product Labeling of New Vaccines (2006–2018) |
title | Elements of Regulatory Dissonance: Examining FDA and EMA Product Labeling of New Vaccines (2006–2018) |
title_full | Elements of Regulatory Dissonance: Examining FDA and EMA Product Labeling of New Vaccines (2006–2018) |
title_fullStr | Elements of Regulatory Dissonance: Examining FDA and EMA Product Labeling of New Vaccines (2006–2018) |
title_full_unstemmed | Elements of Regulatory Dissonance: Examining FDA and EMA Product Labeling of New Vaccines (2006–2018) |
title_short | Elements of Regulatory Dissonance: Examining FDA and EMA Product Labeling of New Vaccines (2006–2018) |
title_sort | elements of regulatory dissonance: examining fda and ema product labeling of new vaccines (2006–2018) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7550305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33059971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.067 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seoyurim elementsofregulatorydissonanceexaminingfdaandemaproductlabelingofnewvaccines20062018 AT pacificieunjoo elementsofregulatorydissonanceexaminingfdaandemaproductlabelingofnewvaccines20062018 |