Cargando…
Non-safety Assessments of Genome-Edited Organisms: Should They be Included in Regulation?
This article presents and evaluates arguments supporting that an approval procedure for genome-edited organisms for food or feed should include a broad assessment of societal, ethical and environmental concerns; so-called non-safety assessment. The core of analysis is the requirement of the Norwegia...
Autores principales: | Myskja, Bjørn Kåre, Myhr, Anne Ingeborg |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7550366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32424723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00222-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
We have never been ELSI researchers – there is no need for a post-ELSI shift
por: Myskja, Bjørn Kåre, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Precaution or Integrated Responsibility Approach to Nanovaccines in Fish Farming? A Critical Appraisal of the UNESCO Precautionary Principle
por: Myhr, Anne Ingeborg, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Less Is More: Norwegian Drug Regulation, Antibiotic Policy, and the “Need Clause”
por: HOBÆK, BÅRD, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The Fifth International Survey of Critical Care Nursing Organizations: Implications for Policy
por: Williams, Ged, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Perceptions of Health-Care Workers of the Cost and Safety of Oral Oncolytic Agents for Patients: A Survey
por: Tompkinson, Madeline, et al.
Publicado: (2020)