Cargando…
Validation of replacement questions for slowness and weakness to assess the Fried Phenotype: a cross-sectional study
PURPOSE: When screening large populations, performance-based measures can be difficult to conduct because they are time consuming and costly, and require well-trained assessors. The aim of the present study is to validate a set of questions replacing the performance-based measures slowness and weakn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7550376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32500516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00337-8 |
_version_ | 1783592963208642560 |
---|---|
author | Van der Elst, Michael C. J. Schoenmakers, Birgitte Op het Veld, Linda P. M. De Roeck, Ellen E. Van der Vorst, Anne Schols, Jos M. G. A. De Lepeleire, Jan Kempen, Gertrudis I. J. M. |
author_facet | Van der Elst, Michael C. J. Schoenmakers, Birgitte Op het Veld, Linda P. M. De Roeck, Ellen E. Van der Vorst, Anne Schols, Jos M. G. A. De Lepeleire, Jan Kempen, Gertrudis I. J. M. |
author_sort | Van der Elst, Michael C. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: When screening large populations, performance-based measures can be difficult to conduct because they are time consuming and costly, and require well-trained assessors. The aim of the present study is to validate a set of questions replacing the performance-based measures slowness and weakness as part of the Fried frailty phenotype (FRIED-P). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among community-dwelling older adults (≥ 60 years) in three Flemish municipalities. The Fried Phenotype (FRIED-P) was used to measure physical frailty. The two performance-based measures of the Fried Phenotype (slowness and weakness) were also measured by means of six substituting questions (FRIED-Q). These questions were validated through sensitivity, specificity, Cohen’s kappa value, observed agreement, correlation analysis, and the area under the curve (AUC, ROC curve). RESULTS: 196 older adults participated. According to the FRIED-P, 19.5% of them were frail, 56.9% were pre-frail and 23.6% were non-frail. For slowness, the observed sensitivity was 47.0%, the specificity was 96.5% and the AUC was 0.717. For weakness, the sensitivity was 46.2%, the specificity was 83.7%, and the AUC was 0.649. The overall Spearman correlation between the FRIED-P and the FRIED-Q was r = 0.721 with an observed agreement of 76.6% (weighted linear kappa value = 0.663, quadratic kappa value = 0.738). CONCLUSIONS: The concordance between the FRIED-P and FRIED-Q was substantial, characterized by a very high specificity, but a moderate sensitivity. This alternative operationalization of the Fried Phenotype—i.e., including six replacement questions instead of two performance-based tests—can be considered to apply as screening tool to screen physical frailty in large populations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41999-020-00337-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7550376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75503762020-10-19 Validation of replacement questions for slowness and weakness to assess the Fried Phenotype: a cross-sectional study Van der Elst, Michael C. J. Schoenmakers, Birgitte Op het Veld, Linda P. M. De Roeck, Ellen E. Van der Vorst, Anne Schols, Jos M. G. A. De Lepeleire, Jan Kempen, Gertrudis I. J. M. Eur Geriatr Med Research Paper PURPOSE: When screening large populations, performance-based measures can be difficult to conduct because they are time consuming and costly, and require well-trained assessors. The aim of the present study is to validate a set of questions replacing the performance-based measures slowness and weakness as part of the Fried frailty phenotype (FRIED-P). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among community-dwelling older adults (≥ 60 years) in three Flemish municipalities. The Fried Phenotype (FRIED-P) was used to measure physical frailty. The two performance-based measures of the Fried Phenotype (slowness and weakness) were also measured by means of six substituting questions (FRIED-Q). These questions were validated through sensitivity, specificity, Cohen’s kappa value, observed agreement, correlation analysis, and the area under the curve (AUC, ROC curve). RESULTS: 196 older adults participated. According to the FRIED-P, 19.5% of them were frail, 56.9% were pre-frail and 23.6% were non-frail. For slowness, the observed sensitivity was 47.0%, the specificity was 96.5% and the AUC was 0.717. For weakness, the sensitivity was 46.2%, the specificity was 83.7%, and the AUC was 0.649. The overall Spearman correlation between the FRIED-P and the FRIED-Q was r = 0.721 with an observed agreement of 76.6% (weighted linear kappa value = 0.663, quadratic kappa value = 0.738). CONCLUSIONS: The concordance between the FRIED-P and FRIED-Q was substantial, characterized by a very high specificity, but a moderate sensitivity. This alternative operationalization of the Fried Phenotype—i.e., including six replacement questions instead of two performance-based tests—can be considered to apply as screening tool to screen physical frailty in large populations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41999-020-00337-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-06-04 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7550376/ /pubmed/32500516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00337-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Van der Elst, Michael C. J. Schoenmakers, Birgitte Op het Veld, Linda P. M. De Roeck, Ellen E. Van der Vorst, Anne Schols, Jos M. G. A. De Lepeleire, Jan Kempen, Gertrudis I. J. M. Validation of replacement questions for slowness and weakness to assess the Fried Phenotype: a cross-sectional study |
title | Validation of replacement questions for slowness and weakness to assess the Fried Phenotype: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Validation of replacement questions for slowness and weakness to assess the Fried Phenotype: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Validation of replacement questions for slowness and weakness to assess the Fried Phenotype: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of replacement questions for slowness and weakness to assess the Fried Phenotype: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Validation of replacement questions for slowness and weakness to assess the Fried Phenotype: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | validation of replacement questions for slowness and weakness to assess the fried phenotype: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7550376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32500516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00337-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderelstmichaelcj validationofreplacementquestionsforslownessandweaknesstoassessthefriedphenotypeacrosssectionalstudy AT schoenmakersbirgitte validationofreplacementquestionsforslownessandweaknesstoassessthefriedphenotypeacrosssectionalstudy AT ophetveldlindapm validationofreplacementquestionsforslownessandweaknesstoassessthefriedphenotypeacrosssectionalstudy AT deroeckellene validationofreplacementquestionsforslownessandweaknesstoassessthefriedphenotypeacrosssectionalstudy AT vandervorstanne validationofreplacementquestionsforslownessandweaknesstoassessthefriedphenotypeacrosssectionalstudy AT scholsjosmga validationofreplacementquestionsforslownessandweaknesstoassessthefriedphenotypeacrosssectionalstudy AT delepeleirejan validationofreplacementquestionsforslownessandweaknesstoassessthefriedphenotypeacrosssectionalstudy AT kempengertrudisijm validationofreplacementquestionsforslownessandweaknesstoassessthefriedphenotypeacrosssectionalstudy AT validationofreplacementquestionsforslownessandweaknesstoassessthefriedphenotypeacrosssectionalstudy |