Cargando…

Uncertainty analysis of tumour absorbed dose calculations in molecular radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: Internal dosimetry evaluation consists of a multi-step process ranging from imaging acquisition to absorbed dose calculations. Assessment of uncertainty is complicated and, for that reason, it is commonly ignored in clinical routine. However, it is essential for adequate interpretation o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Finocchiaro, Domenico, Gear, Jonathan I., Fioroni, Federica, Flux, Glenn D., Murray, Iain, Castellani, Gastone, Versari, Annibale, Iori, Mauro, Grassi, Elisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7550507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33044651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-00328-5
_version_ 1783592982617784320
author Finocchiaro, Domenico
Gear, Jonathan I.
Fioroni, Federica
Flux, Glenn D.
Murray, Iain
Castellani, Gastone
Versari, Annibale
Iori, Mauro
Grassi, Elisa
author_facet Finocchiaro, Domenico
Gear, Jonathan I.
Fioroni, Federica
Flux, Glenn D.
Murray, Iain
Castellani, Gastone
Versari, Annibale
Iori, Mauro
Grassi, Elisa
author_sort Finocchiaro, Domenico
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Internal dosimetry evaluation consists of a multi-step process ranging from imaging acquisition to absorbed dose calculations. Assessment of uncertainty is complicated and, for that reason, it is commonly ignored in clinical routine. However, it is essential for adequate interpretation of the results. Recently, the EANM published a practical guidance on uncertainty analysis for molecular radiotherapy based on the application of the law of propagation of uncertainty. In this study, we investigated the overall uncertainty on a sample of a patient following the EANM guidelines. The aim of this study was to provide an indication of the typical uncertainties that may be expected from performing dosimetry, to determine parameters that have the greatest effect on the accuracy of calculations and to consider the potential improvements that could be made if these effects were reduced. RESULTS: Absorbed doses and the relative uncertainties were calculated for a sample of 49 patients and a total of 154 tumours. A wide range of relative absorbed dose uncertainty values was observed (14–102%). Uncertainties associated with each quantity along the absorbed dose calculation chain (i.e. volume, recovery coefficient, calibration factor, activity, time-activity curve fitting, time-integrated activity and absorbed dose) were estimated. An equation was derived to describe the relationship between the uncertainty in the absorbed dose and the volume. The largest source of error was the VOI delineation. By postulating different values of FWHM, the impact of the imaging system spatial resolution on the uncertainties was investigated. DISCUSSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first analysis of uncertainty in molecular radiotherapy based on a cohort of clinical cases. Wide inter-lesion variability of absorbed dose uncertainty was observed. Hence, a proper assessment of the uncertainties associated with the calculations should be considered as a basic scientific standard. A model for a quick estimate of uncertainty without implementing the entire error propagation schema, which may be useful in clinical practice, was presented. Ameliorating spatial resolution may be in future the key factor for accurate absorbed dose assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7550507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75505072020-10-19 Uncertainty analysis of tumour absorbed dose calculations in molecular radiotherapy Finocchiaro, Domenico Gear, Jonathan I. Fioroni, Federica Flux, Glenn D. Murray, Iain Castellani, Gastone Versari, Annibale Iori, Mauro Grassi, Elisa EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: Internal dosimetry evaluation consists of a multi-step process ranging from imaging acquisition to absorbed dose calculations. Assessment of uncertainty is complicated and, for that reason, it is commonly ignored in clinical routine. However, it is essential for adequate interpretation of the results. Recently, the EANM published a practical guidance on uncertainty analysis for molecular radiotherapy based on the application of the law of propagation of uncertainty. In this study, we investigated the overall uncertainty on a sample of a patient following the EANM guidelines. The aim of this study was to provide an indication of the typical uncertainties that may be expected from performing dosimetry, to determine parameters that have the greatest effect on the accuracy of calculations and to consider the potential improvements that could be made if these effects were reduced. RESULTS: Absorbed doses and the relative uncertainties were calculated for a sample of 49 patients and a total of 154 tumours. A wide range of relative absorbed dose uncertainty values was observed (14–102%). Uncertainties associated with each quantity along the absorbed dose calculation chain (i.e. volume, recovery coefficient, calibration factor, activity, time-activity curve fitting, time-integrated activity and absorbed dose) were estimated. An equation was derived to describe the relationship between the uncertainty in the absorbed dose and the volume. The largest source of error was the VOI delineation. By postulating different values of FWHM, the impact of the imaging system spatial resolution on the uncertainties was investigated. DISCUSSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first analysis of uncertainty in molecular radiotherapy based on a cohort of clinical cases. Wide inter-lesion variability of absorbed dose uncertainty was observed. Hence, a proper assessment of the uncertainties associated with the calculations should be considered as a basic scientific standard. A model for a quick estimate of uncertainty without implementing the entire error propagation schema, which may be useful in clinical practice, was presented. Ameliorating spatial resolution may be in future the key factor for accurate absorbed dose assessment. Springer International Publishing 2020-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7550507/ /pubmed/33044651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-00328-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Finocchiaro, Domenico
Gear, Jonathan I.
Fioroni, Federica
Flux, Glenn D.
Murray, Iain
Castellani, Gastone
Versari, Annibale
Iori, Mauro
Grassi, Elisa
Uncertainty analysis of tumour absorbed dose calculations in molecular radiotherapy
title Uncertainty analysis of tumour absorbed dose calculations in molecular radiotherapy
title_full Uncertainty analysis of tumour absorbed dose calculations in molecular radiotherapy
title_fullStr Uncertainty analysis of tumour absorbed dose calculations in molecular radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Uncertainty analysis of tumour absorbed dose calculations in molecular radiotherapy
title_short Uncertainty analysis of tumour absorbed dose calculations in molecular radiotherapy
title_sort uncertainty analysis of tumour absorbed dose calculations in molecular radiotherapy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7550507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33044651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-00328-5
work_keys_str_mv AT finocchiarodomenico uncertaintyanalysisoftumourabsorbeddosecalculationsinmolecularradiotherapy
AT gearjonathani uncertaintyanalysisoftumourabsorbeddosecalculationsinmolecularradiotherapy
AT fioronifederica uncertaintyanalysisoftumourabsorbeddosecalculationsinmolecularradiotherapy
AT fluxglennd uncertaintyanalysisoftumourabsorbeddosecalculationsinmolecularradiotherapy
AT murrayiain uncertaintyanalysisoftumourabsorbeddosecalculationsinmolecularradiotherapy
AT castellanigastone uncertaintyanalysisoftumourabsorbeddosecalculationsinmolecularradiotherapy
AT versariannibale uncertaintyanalysisoftumourabsorbeddosecalculationsinmolecularradiotherapy
AT iorimauro uncertaintyanalysisoftumourabsorbeddosecalculationsinmolecularradiotherapy
AT grassielisa uncertaintyanalysisoftumourabsorbeddosecalculationsinmolecularradiotherapy