Cargando…

Underreporting of Obesity in Hospital Inpatients: A Comparison of Body Mass Index and Administrative Documentation in Australian Hospitals

Despite its high prevalence, there is no systematic approach to documenting and coding obesity in hospitals. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of obesity among inpatients, the proportion of obese patients recognised as obese by hospital administration, and the cost associated with their a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Bella, Alexandra L, Comans, Tracy, Gane, Elise M, Young, Adrienne M, Hickling, Donna F, Lucas, Alisha, Hickman, Ingrid J, Banks, Merrilyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7551369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32932810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030334
_version_ 1783593168658235392
author Di Bella, Alexandra L
Comans, Tracy
Gane, Elise M
Young, Adrienne M
Hickling, Donna F
Lucas, Alisha
Hickman, Ingrid J
Banks, Merrilyn
author_facet Di Bella, Alexandra L
Comans, Tracy
Gane, Elise M
Young, Adrienne M
Hickling, Donna F
Lucas, Alisha
Hickman, Ingrid J
Banks, Merrilyn
author_sort Di Bella, Alexandra L
collection PubMed
description Despite its high prevalence, there is no systematic approach to documenting and coding obesity in hospitals. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of obesity among inpatients, the proportion of obese patients recognised as obese by hospital administration, and the cost associated with their admission. A cross-sectional study was undertaken in three hospitals in Queensland, Australia. Inpatients present on three audit days were included in this study. Data collected were age, sex, height, and weight. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated in accordance with the World Health Organization’s definition. Administrative data were sourced from hospital records departments to determine the number of patients officially documented as obese. Total actual costing data were sourced from hospital finance departments. From a combined cohort of n = 1327 inpatients (57% male, mean (SD) age: 61 (19) years, BMI: 28 (9) kg/m(2)), the prevalence of obesity was 32% (n = 421). Only half of obese patients were recognised as obese by hospital administration. A large variation in the cost of admission across BMI categories prohibited any statistical determination of difference. Obesity is highly prevalent among hospital inpatients in Queensland, Australia. Current methods of identifying obesity for administrative/funding purposes are not accurate and would benefit from reforms to measure the true impact of healthcare costs from obesity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7551369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75513692020-10-14 Underreporting of Obesity in Hospital Inpatients: A Comparison of Body Mass Index and Administrative Documentation in Australian Hospitals Di Bella, Alexandra L Comans, Tracy Gane, Elise M Young, Adrienne M Hickling, Donna F Lucas, Alisha Hickman, Ingrid J Banks, Merrilyn Healthcare (Basel) Article Despite its high prevalence, there is no systematic approach to documenting and coding obesity in hospitals. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of obesity among inpatients, the proportion of obese patients recognised as obese by hospital administration, and the cost associated with their admission. A cross-sectional study was undertaken in three hospitals in Queensland, Australia. Inpatients present on three audit days were included in this study. Data collected were age, sex, height, and weight. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated in accordance with the World Health Organization’s definition. Administrative data were sourced from hospital records departments to determine the number of patients officially documented as obese. Total actual costing data were sourced from hospital finance departments. From a combined cohort of n = 1327 inpatients (57% male, mean (SD) age: 61 (19) years, BMI: 28 (9) kg/m(2)), the prevalence of obesity was 32% (n = 421). Only half of obese patients were recognised as obese by hospital administration. A large variation in the cost of admission across BMI categories prohibited any statistical determination of difference. Obesity is highly prevalent among hospital inpatients in Queensland, Australia. Current methods of identifying obesity for administrative/funding purposes are not accurate and would benefit from reforms to measure the true impact of healthcare costs from obesity. MDPI 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7551369/ /pubmed/32932810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030334 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Di Bella, Alexandra L
Comans, Tracy
Gane, Elise M
Young, Adrienne M
Hickling, Donna F
Lucas, Alisha
Hickman, Ingrid J
Banks, Merrilyn
Underreporting of Obesity in Hospital Inpatients: A Comparison of Body Mass Index and Administrative Documentation in Australian Hospitals
title Underreporting of Obesity in Hospital Inpatients: A Comparison of Body Mass Index and Administrative Documentation in Australian Hospitals
title_full Underreporting of Obesity in Hospital Inpatients: A Comparison of Body Mass Index and Administrative Documentation in Australian Hospitals
title_fullStr Underreporting of Obesity in Hospital Inpatients: A Comparison of Body Mass Index and Administrative Documentation in Australian Hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Underreporting of Obesity in Hospital Inpatients: A Comparison of Body Mass Index and Administrative Documentation in Australian Hospitals
title_short Underreporting of Obesity in Hospital Inpatients: A Comparison of Body Mass Index and Administrative Documentation in Australian Hospitals
title_sort underreporting of obesity in hospital inpatients: a comparison of body mass index and administrative documentation in australian hospitals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7551369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32932810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030334
work_keys_str_mv AT dibellaalexandral underreportingofobesityinhospitalinpatientsacomparisonofbodymassindexandadministrativedocumentationinaustralianhospitals
AT comanstracy underreportingofobesityinhospitalinpatientsacomparisonofbodymassindexandadministrativedocumentationinaustralianhospitals
AT ganeelisem underreportingofobesityinhospitalinpatientsacomparisonofbodymassindexandadministrativedocumentationinaustralianhospitals
AT youngadriennem underreportingofobesityinhospitalinpatientsacomparisonofbodymassindexandadministrativedocumentationinaustralianhospitals
AT hicklingdonnaf underreportingofobesityinhospitalinpatientsacomparisonofbodymassindexandadministrativedocumentationinaustralianhospitals
AT lucasalisha underreportingofobesityinhospitalinpatientsacomparisonofbodymassindexandadministrativedocumentationinaustralianhospitals
AT hickmaningridj underreportingofobesityinhospitalinpatientsacomparisonofbodymassindexandadministrativedocumentationinaustralianhospitals
AT banksmerrilyn underreportingofobesityinhospitalinpatientsacomparisonofbodymassindexandadministrativedocumentationinaustralianhospitals