Cargando…

Is arthroplaSty bEtter than interNal fixation for undiSplaced femoral nEck fracture? A national pragmatic RCT: the SENSE trial

INTRODUCTION: Undisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are usually treated by internal fixation (IF) but two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated advantages of treatment with arthroplasty. The complication rate was lowered but there were no clinically improved patient-reported outc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viberg, Bjarke, Kold, Søren, Brink, Ole, Larsen, Morten Schultz, Hare, Kristoffer Borbjerg, Palm, Henrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7552868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33040011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038442
_version_ 1783593491537854464
author Viberg, Bjarke
Kold, Søren
Brink, Ole
Larsen, Morten Schultz
Hare, Kristoffer Borbjerg
Palm, Henrik
author_facet Viberg, Bjarke
Kold, Søren
Brink, Ole
Larsen, Morten Schultz
Hare, Kristoffer Borbjerg
Palm, Henrik
author_sort Viberg, Bjarke
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Undisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are usually treated by internal fixation (IF) but two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated advantages of treatment with arthroplasty. The complication rate was lowered but there were no clinically improved patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), which could be due to underpowering or choice of selected PROM as the studies do appear to report a better functional outcome. We will conduct an RCT comparing IF with arthroplasties in patients aged over 65 years with an undisplaced FNF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: All hospitals in Denmark treating patients with hip fracture can provide patients for this study; therefore, the study can be considered a national RCT. Patients over 65 years old with an undisplaced FNF will be screened for eligibility and patients will only be excluded if they are unable to understand the study information (due to dementia or language), if they have a posterior tilt >20°, a pathological fracture or they cannot walk. Participants will be electronically randomised (in alternating blocks of 4 or 6) into either IF or arthroplasty. Postoperative care will follow the department standards. Primary and secondary outcomes and measuring points have been established in collaboration with patients with hip fracture by focus group interviews. The primary outcome measure is the New Mobility Score assessed after 1 year. Secondary outcomes are the Oxford Hip Score, EuroQol 5 domain (EQ-5D-5L), degree of posterior tilt, pain Verbal Rating Scale, reoperation and mortality. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (19/7429) and the scientific ethics committee (S-20180036). All participants will sign an informed consent before entering the trial. Because this is a national trial, all relevant healthcare professionals in Denmark will automatically receive the trial results that will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04075461).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7552868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75528682020-10-21 Is arthroplaSty bEtter than interNal fixation for undiSplaced femoral nEck fracture? A national pragmatic RCT: the SENSE trial Viberg, Bjarke Kold, Søren Brink, Ole Larsen, Morten Schultz Hare, Kristoffer Borbjerg Palm, Henrik BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Undisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are usually treated by internal fixation (IF) but two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated advantages of treatment with arthroplasty. The complication rate was lowered but there were no clinically improved patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), which could be due to underpowering or choice of selected PROM as the studies do appear to report a better functional outcome. We will conduct an RCT comparing IF with arthroplasties in patients aged over 65 years with an undisplaced FNF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: All hospitals in Denmark treating patients with hip fracture can provide patients for this study; therefore, the study can be considered a national RCT. Patients over 65 years old with an undisplaced FNF will be screened for eligibility and patients will only be excluded if they are unable to understand the study information (due to dementia or language), if they have a posterior tilt >20°, a pathological fracture or they cannot walk. Participants will be electronically randomised (in alternating blocks of 4 or 6) into either IF or arthroplasty. Postoperative care will follow the department standards. Primary and secondary outcomes and measuring points have been established in collaboration with patients with hip fracture by focus group interviews. The primary outcome measure is the New Mobility Score assessed after 1 year. Secondary outcomes are the Oxford Hip Score, EuroQol 5 domain (EQ-5D-5L), degree of posterior tilt, pain Verbal Rating Scale, reoperation and mortality. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (19/7429) and the scientific ethics committee (S-20180036). All participants will sign an informed consent before entering the trial. Because this is a national trial, all relevant healthcare professionals in Denmark will automatically receive the trial results that will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04075461). BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7552868/ /pubmed/33040011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038442 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Viberg, Bjarke
Kold, Søren
Brink, Ole
Larsen, Morten Schultz
Hare, Kristoffer Borbjerg
Palm, Henrik
Is arthroplaSty bEtter than interNal fixation for undiSplaced femoral nEck fracture? A national pragmatic RCT: the SENSE trial
title Is arthroplaSty bEtter than interNal fixation for undiSplaced femoral nEck fracture? A national pragmatic RCT: the SENSE trial
title_full Is arthroplaSty bEtter than interNal fixation for undiSplaced femoral nEck fracture? A national pragmatic RCT: the SENSE trial
title_fullStr Is arthroplaSty bEtter than interNal fixation for undiSplaced femoral nEck fracture? A national pragmatic RCT: the SENSE trial
title_full_unstemmed Is arthroplaSty bEtter than interNal fixation for undiSplaced femoral nEck fracture? A national pragmatic RCT: the SENSE trial
title_short Is arthroplaSty bEtter than interNal fixation for undiSplaced femoral nEck fracture? A national pragmatic RCT: the SENSE trial
title_sort is arthroplasty better than internal fixation for undisplaced femoral neck fracture? a national pragmatic rct: the sense trial
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7552868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33040011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038442
work_keys_str_mv AT vibergbjarke isarthroplastybetterthaninternalfixationforundisplacedfemoralneckfractureanationalpragmaticrctthesensetrial
AT koldsøren isarthroplastybetterthaninternalfixationforundisplacedfemoralneckfractureanationalpragmaticrctthesensetrial
AT brinkole isarthroplastybetterthaninternalfixationforundisplacedfemoralneckfractureanationalpragmaticrctthesensetrial
AT larsenmortenschultz isarthroplastybetterthaninternalfixationforundisplacedfemoralneckfractureanationalpragmaticrctthesensetrial
AT harekristofferborbjerg isarthroplastybetterthaninternalfixationforundisplacedfemoralneckfractureanationalpragmaticrctthesensetrial
AT palmhenrik isarthroplastybetterthaninternalfixationforundisplacedfemoralneckfractureanationalpragmaticrctthesensetrial
AT isarthroplastybetterthaninternalfixationforundisplacedfemoralneckfractureanationalpragmaticrctthesensetrial