Cargando…

Außergerichtliche Gutachtenerstellung in Praxis- und Klinikalltag

Physicians are often confronted with the task of having to answer queries from various authorities and insurance companies. In order to avoid errors and for effective processing it is necessary to consider the different framework and legal conditions that are applicable. A comparison between statuto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heufelder, M., Klemm, H.‑T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2020
Materias:
CME
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553379/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12285-020-00272-4
_version_ 1783593589800960000
author Heufelder, M.
Klemm, H.‑T.
author_facet Heufelder, M.
Klemm, H.‑T.
author_sort Heufelder, M.
collection PubMed
description Physicians are often confronted with the task of having to answer queries from various authorities and insurance companies. In order to avoid errors and for effective processing it is necessary to consider the different framework and legal conditions that are applicable. A comparison between statutory and private insurance queries on accidents, disabilities and pensions reveals decisive differences in the appraisal of available findings as well as in their later evaluation. Even in the issuing of certification of incapacity to work in the statutory and private contexts or in insurance letters on medical necessity and in billing questions, there are differences which the physician should know and take into account. If private expert opinions are required importance should be placed on the neutral and objectively founded examination of the contested facts and circumstances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7553379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75533792020-10-14 Außergerichtliche Gutachtenerstellung in Praxis- und Klinikalltag Heufelder, M. Klemm, H.‑T. MKG-Chirurg CME Physicians are often confronted with the task of having to answer queries from various authorities and insurance companies. In order to avoid errors and for effective processing it is necessary to consider the different framework and legal conditions that are applicable. A comparison between statutory and private insurance queries on accidents, disabilities and pensions reveals decisive differences in the appraisal of available findings as well as in their later evaluation. Even in the issuing of certification of incapacity to work in the statutory and private contexts or in insurance letters on medical necessity and in billing questions, there are differences which the physician should know and take into account. If private expert opinions are required importance should be placed on the neutral and objectively founded examination of the contested facts and circumstances. Springer Medizin 2020-10-13 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7553379/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12285-020-00272-4 Text en © Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle CME
Heufelder, M.
Klemm, H.‑T.
Außergerichtliche Gutachtenerstellung in Praxis- und Klinikalltag
title Außergerichtliche Gutachtenerstellung in Praxis- und Klinikalltag
title_full Außergerichtliche Gutachtenerstellung in Praxis- und Klinikalltag
title_fullStr Außergerichtliche Gutachtenerstellung in Praxis- und Klinikalltag
title_full_unstemmed Außergerichtliche Gutachtenerstellung in Praxis- und Klinikalltag
title_short Außergerichtliche Gutachtenerstellung in Praxis- und Klinikalltag
title_sort außergerichtliche gutachtenerstellung in praxis- und klinikalltag
topic CME
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553379/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12285-020-00272-4
work_keys_str_mv AT heufelderm außergerichtlichegutachtenerstellunginpraxisundklinikalltag
AT klemmht außergerichtlichegutachtenerstellunginpraxisundklinikalltag