Cargando…

Efficacy and Use of Cloth Masks: A Scoping Review

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there has been a global shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE). In this setting, cloth masks may play an important role in limiting disease transmission; however, current literature on the use of cloth masks remains inconclusive. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Mehr, Kim, Sonya T, Xu, Chenchen, Li, Heidi, Rose, Greg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33062538
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10423
_version_ 1783593660012560384
author Jain, Mehr
Kim, Sonya T
Xu, Chenchen
Li, Heidi
Rose, Greg
author_facet Jain, Mehr
Kim, Sonya T
Xu, Chenchen
Li, Heidi
Rose, Greg
author_sort Jain, Mehr
collection PubMed
description During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there has been a global shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE). In this setting, cloth masks may play an important role in limiting disease transmission; however, current literature on the use of cloth masks remains inconclusive. This review aims to integrate current studies and guidelines to determine the efficacy and use of cloth masks in healthcare settings and/or the community. Evidence-based suggestions on the most effective use of cloth masks during a pandemic are presented. Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar were searched on March 31, 2020, and updated on April 6, 2020. Studies reporting on the efficacy, usability, and accessibility of cloth masks were included. Additionally, a search of guidelines and recommendations on cloth mask usage was conducted through published material by international and national public health agencies. Nine articles were included in this review after full-text screening. The clinical efficacy of a face mask is determined by the filtration efficacy of the material, fit of the mask, and compliance to wearing the mask. Household fabrics such as cotton T-shirts and towels have some filtration efficacy and therefore potential for droplet retention and protection against virus-containing particles. However, the percentage of penetration in cloth masks is higher than surgical masks or N95 respirators. Cloth masks have limited inward protection in healthcare settings where viral exposure is high but may be beneficial for outward protection in low-risk settings and use by the general public where no other alternatives to medical masks are available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7553716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75537162020-10-14 Efficacy and Use of Cloth Masks: A Scoping Review Jain, Mehr Kim, Sonya T Xu, Chenchen Li, Heidi Rose, Greg Cureus Infectious Disease During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there has been a global shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE). In this setting, cloth masks may play an important role in limiting disease transmission; however, current literature on the use of cloth masks remains inconclusive. This review aims to integrate current studies and guidelines to determine the efficacy and use of cloth masks in healthcare settings and/or the community. Evidence-based suggestions on the most effective use of cloth masks during a pandemic are presented. Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar were searched on March 31, 2020, and updated on April 6, 2020. Studies reporting on the efficacy, usability, and accessibility of cloth masks were included. Additionally, a search of guidelines and recommendations on cloth mask usage was conducted through published material by international and national public health agencies. Nine articles were included in this review after full-text screening. The clinical efficacy of a face mask is determined by the filtration efficacy of the material, fit of the mask, and compliance to wearing the mask. Household fabrics such as cotton T-shirts and towels have some filtration efficacy and therefore potential for droplet retention and protection against virus-containing particles. However, the percentage of penetration in cloth masks is higher than surgical masks or N95 respirators. Cloth masks have limited inward protection in healthcare settings where viral exposure is high but may be beneficial for outward protection in low-risk settings and use by the general public where no other alternatives to medical masks are available. Cureus 2020-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7553716/ /pubmed/33062538 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10423 Text en Copyright © 2020, Jain et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Infectious Disease
Jain, Mehr
Kim, Sonya T
Xu, Chenchen
Li, Heidi
Rose, Greg
Efficacy and Use of Cloth Masks: A Scoping Review
title Efficacy and Use of Cloth Masks: A Scoping Review
title_full Efficacy and Use of Cloth Masks: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Efficacy and Use of Cloth Masks: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Use of Cloth Masks: A Scoping Review
title_short Efficacy and Use of Cloth Masks: A Scoping Review
title_sort efficacy and use of cloth masks: a scoping review
topic Infectious Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33062538
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10423
work_keys_str_mv AT jainmehr efficacyanduseofclothmasksascopingreview
AT kimsonyat efficacyanduseofclothmasksascopingreview
AT xuchenchen efficacyanduseofclothmasksascopingreview
AT liheidi efficacyanduseofclothmasksascopingreview
AT rosegreg efficacyanduseofclothmasksascopingreview