Cargando…

Tracheostomy in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Experience from Eastern India

OBJECTIVE: Tracheostomy is one of the most commonly used surgical intervention in sick children in the intensive care unit. The literature in the pediatric population is limited, therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the indications, timing, complications, and outcomes of tracheostomy among...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Mukesh Kumar, Patnaik, Sibabratta, Sahoo, Bandya, Mishra, Reshmi, Behera, Jyoti Ranjan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer India 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12098-020-03514-6
_version_ 1783593677064503296
author Jain, Mukesh Kumar
Patnaik, Sibabratta
Sahoo, Bandya
Mishra, Reshmi
Behera, Jyoti Ranjan
author_facet Jain, Mukesh Kumar
Patnaik, Sibabratta
Sahoo, Bandya
Mishra, Reshmi
Behera, Jyoti Ranjan
author_sort Jain, Mukesh Kumar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Tracheostomy is one of the most commonly used surgical intervention in sick children in the intensive care unit. The literature in the pediatric population is limited, therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the indications, timing, complications, and outcomes of tracheostomy among the children at our center. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted from January 2016 through December 2019. Data was collected from the patients’ records and analyzed. RESULTS: During this study period, 283 children were ventilated, of which 26 (9.1%) required tracheostomy. Among this 73% were boys. The median age of the children who underwent tracheostomy was 6.32 y. The most common indication for tracheostomy was prolonged mechanical ventilation [24 cases (92%)] followed by upper airway obstruction [2 cases (8%)]. The average time of tracheostomy was 11.65 d, range (1–21 d). Complications were seen in 14 patients (55%). The most common complications were accidental decannulation, occlusion, pneumothorax, and granulation tissue. Twenty one (80%) patients were successfully discharged, out of which 16 (61%) patients were discharged after decannulation and 5 (21%) were sent home with a tracheostomy tube in situ. Overall mortality in present study was 11.5%; none was directly related to tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS: The indication for tracheostomy has been changed from emergency to more elective one. Prolonged mechanical ventilation is the most common indication for tracheostomy. Although the timing of tracheostomy is not fixed, two weeks time is reasonable and it can be done safely at the bedside in pediatric intensive care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7553802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer India
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75538022020-10-14 Tracheostomy in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Experience from Eastern India Jain, Mukesh Kumar Patnaik, Sibabratta Sahoo, Bandya Mishra, Reshmi Behera, Jyoti Ranjan Indian J Pediatr Original Article OBJECTIVE: Tracheostomy is one of the most commonly used surgical intervention in sick children in the intensive care unit. The literature in the pediatric population is limited, therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the indications, timing, complications, and outcomes of tracheostomy among the children at our center. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted from January 2016 through December 2019. Data was collected from the patients’ records and analyzed. RESULTS: During this study period, 283 children were ventilated, of which 26 (9.1%) required tracheostomy. Among this 73% were boys. The median age of the children who underwent tracheostomy was 6.32 y. The most common indication for tracheostomy was prolonged mechanical ventilation [24 cases (92%)] followed by upper airway obstruction [2 cases (8%)]. The average time of tracheostomy was 11.65 d, range (1–21 d). Complications were seen in 14 patients (55%). The most common complications were accidental decannulation, occlusion, pneumothorax, and granulation tissue. Twenty one (80%) patients were successfully discharged, out of which 16 (61%) patients were discharged after decannulation and 5 (21%) were sent home with a tracheostomy tube in situ. Overall mortality in present study was 11.5%; none was directly related to tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS: The indication for tracheostomy has been changed from emergency to more elective one. Prolonged mechanical ventilation is the most common indication for tracheostomy. Although the timing of tracheostomy is not fixed, two weeks time is reasonable and it can be done safely at the bedside in pediatric intensive care. Springer India 2020-10-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7553802/ /pubmed/33051785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12098-020-03514-6 Text en © Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jain, Mukesh Kumar
Patnaik, Sibabratta
Sahoo, Bandya
Mishra, Reshmi
Behera, Jyoti Ranjan
Tracheostomy in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Experience from Eastern India
title Tracheostomy in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Experience from Eastern India
title_full Tracheostomy in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Experience from Eastern India
title_fullStr Tracheostomy in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Experience from Eastern India
title_full_unstemmed Tracheostomy in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Experience from Eastern India
title_short Tracheostomy in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Experience from Eastern India
title_sort tracheostomy in pediatric intensive care unit: experience from eastern india
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12098-020-03514-6
work_keys_str_mv AT jainmukeshkumar tracheostomyinpediatricintensivecareunitexperiencefromeasternindia
AT patnaiksibabratta tracheostomyinpediatricintensivecareunitexperiencefromeasternindia
AT sahoobandya tracheostomyinpediatricintensivecareunitexperiencefromeasternindia
AT mishrareshmi tracheostomyinpediatricintensivecareunitexperiencefromeasternindia
AT beherajyotiranjan tracheostomyinpediatricintensivecareunitexperiencefromeasternindia